Satellits are faked? haha, good one ;-)

You know you can see satellits with a good telescope?
Or let me guess... Im just imagined all these giant cubes out of metall with solar panels on it huh?
srsl. you guys are good at hoaxing things people can not see on their own. (Going to space etc.)
But guys.... this is bullshit. Im sure my telescope is not controlled by the goverment.

You know you can see satellits with a good telescope?
Or let me guess... Im just imagined all these giant cubes out of metall with solar panels on it huh?
srsl. you guys are good at hoaxing things people can not see on their own. (Going to space etc.)
But guys.... this is bullshit. Im sure my telescope is not controlled by the goverment.

Stufferus,

Do you have any good closeups pics of them around the Clark belt? They should be easy to see because they are in sync with the Earth. I'd love to see a good color picture of them all lined up 2 degrees apart.

Yendor

Yendor

Of course i could take my smartphone and set the camera on the lens. But there is a lot of loss in quality and you would end up saying "The footage is faked"... maybe trying it out your own?
And please. give me some good evidence. Seing satellits trough telescopes has already proven to be true. Now just try explaining why this is possible? (btw. there is a lot of film on youtube viewing satellits etc)

Quote from: Stufferus on July 02, 2015, 08:49:43 AM

You know you can see satellits with a good telescope?
Or let me guess... Im just imagined all these giant cubes out of metall with solar panels on it huh?
srsl. you guys are good at hoaxing things people can not see on their own. (Going to space etc.)
But guys.... this is bullshit. Im sure my telescope is not controlled by the goverment.

Stufferus,

Do you have any good closeups pics of them around the Clark belt?

Telescope fixed, so satellites tracked, stars are trails.


Stars are tracked, satellites are trails.


More here. This page has some broken links, but some photos of the satellites along with explanatory text.

They should be easy to see because they are in sync with the Earth.

They're a long way off, so they're pretty dim.

I'd love to see a good color picture of them all lined up 2 degrees apart.

Didn't you claim to be in this business? Why do you think they're "all lined up 2 degrees apart"?

Quote from: Yendor on July 02, 2015, 09:01:00 AM

I'd love to see a good color picture of them all lined up 2 degrees apart.

Didn't you claim to be in this business? Why do you think they're "all lined up 2 degrees apart"?

Nice pictures. I think it is because these sats are communication sats in geosynchronous orbit. Having them 2 deg apart makes it possible to avoid getting mixed signals.

Quote from: Alpha2Omega on July 02, 2015, 10:27:41 AM

Quote from: Yendor on July 02, 2015, 09:01:00 AM

I'd love to see a good color picture of them all lined up 2 degrees apart.

Didn't you claim to be in this business? Why do you think they're "all lined up 2 degrees apart"?

Nice pictures. I think it is because these sats are communication sats in geosynchronous orbit. Having them 2 deg apart makes it possible to avoid getting mixed signals.

That 2° spacing plan is only notional, and each "slot" is often occupied by several satellites, thus the "constellations", or clusters, in the photos. The slots aren't a uniform 2° apart, either. See, for instance, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satellites_in_geosynchronous_orbit.

so.. no flat earther trying to debate about this? Oh well. such a suprise. This evidence is crystal clear and there is nothing to unprove this. common feers.. we are waiting.