It seems that when scepti is unable to answer a question without opening a minefield, he says "YOU AREN'T WORTHY!". So who IS worthy of this vast knowledge?
I'd guess anybody with a verified IQ of less than 60. And no... my IQ is—no doubt surprisingly to some here—actually in triple digits. 
IQ is just a load of made up nonsense to place people into classes of society.
A high IQ against a low IQ means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
There's visual learners and there's practical as well as auditory learners. The speed of an answer does not make a person any more intelligent than someone who is not so fast.
If we had to work on IQ then mine is 500+ but I don't push that because it isn't a real rule of thumb on a persons creative intelligence or ability to logically think, overall.
I view each person with the ability to think; as the same. Nobody is better than anybody else overall; and I mean overall - not just with one specific thing.
The so called slow person who appears to be intellectually challenged when pitted against someone who can speedily solve a puzzle, yet that same so called intellectually challenged person could be a genius artist, etc, whilst the theoretical person lacks the ability to put practical use to those theories.