The moon

  • 75 Replies
  • 14863 Views
?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #60 on: March 02, 2011, 10:41:22 AM »
Bacteria are not shrimp like. Please James you are doing great harm to moon shrimp theory by showing your ignorance. We must be taken seriously by the establishment.

In what sense are shrimp dissimilar to lunar bacteria?

I don't have time to go into the details now. Suffice to say that you do not have the grounding in Biological Sciences that I have, nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +99/-139
Re: The moon
« Reply #61 on: March 02, 2011, 10:54:42 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

One

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: The moon
« Reply #62 on: March 02, 2011, 10:57:04 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?

Classic Crustinator, avoids the question, and tells you how intelligent he is, and how certain he is of his fact, despite it having zero proof.
I said that they were answered.  I didn't say that they were answered correctly.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #63 on: March 02, 2011, 11:00:58 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?

You are the one coming here with your claims. You must provide evidence for them or admit defeat.

?

One

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: The moon
« Reply #64 on: March 02, 2011, 11:30:59 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?

You are the one coming here with your claims. You must provide evidence for them or admit defeat.

Classic Crustinator, avoids the question, and tells you how intelligent he is, and how certain he is of his fact, despite it having zero proof.
I said that they were answered.  I didn't say that they were answered correctly.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +99/-139
Re: The moon
« Reply #65 on: March 02, 2011, 11:32:17 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?

You are the one coming here with your claims. You must provide evidence for them or admit defeat.

I'm not claiming anything.  You are the one claiming that moon shrimp do exist therefore the burden is upon you.  I'm just asking you if you "performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist" that you claim that James did not.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #66 on: March 05, 2011, 06:33:56 AM »
...nor have you performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist.

Have you?  If so, do you have any evidence to support this claim?

You are the one coming here with your claims. You must provide evidence for them or admit defeat.

I'm not claiming anything.  You are the one claiming that moon shrimp do exist therefore the burden is upon you.  I'm just asking you if you "performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist" that you claim that James did not.

You're asking me to provide evidence that my own theories are incorrect? Why would I do that?! It is the role of the accusor to present his or her evidence and it will be judged alongside any existing theory to gauge it's merit.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +99/-139
Re: The moon
« Reply #67 on: March 05, 2011, 08:25:18 AM »
You're asking me to provide evidence that my own theories are incorrect?

No.  I'm asking for evidence that you have "performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".

It is the role of the accusor to present his or her evidence and it will be judged alongside any existing theory to gauge it's merit.

I'm not accusing you of anything.  You are the one accusing John of not performing "the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #68 on: March 05, 2011, 09:11:32 AM »
You're asking me to provide evidence that my own theories are incorrect?

No.  I'm asking for evidence that you have "performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".

It is the role of the accusor to present his or her evidence and it will be judged alongside any existing theory to gauge it's merit.

I'm not accusing you of anything.  You are the one accusing John of not performing "the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".

Flat earth believers never accuse each other. Unlike RE scientists who are constantly bickering and sniping and running off with each others wifes or wearing nappies.

Instead we work together to achieve harmony and agreement against the NASA aggressor.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +99/-139
Re: The moon
« Reply #69 on: March 05, 2011, 09:19:59 AM »
You're asking me to provide evidence that my own theories are incorrect?

No.  I'm asking for evidence that you have "performed the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".

It is the role of the accusor to present his or her evidence and it will be judged alongside any existing theory to gauge it's merit.

I'm not accusing you of anything.  You are the one accusing John of not performing "the necessary experiments that prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that moon shrimp exist".

Flat earth believers never accuse each other. Unlike RE scientists who are constantly bickering and sniping and running off with each others wifes or wearing nappies.

Instead we work together to achieve harmony and agreement against the NASA aggressor.

You also apparently share the FE believer trait of not answering direct questions.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #70 on: March 05, 2011, 09:22:05 AM »
There was no question. I was defending the honour of FE. This I will do to my dying breath.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45173
  • +99/-139
Re: The moon
« Reply #71 on: March 05, 2011, 10:52:10 AM »
There was no question. I was defending the honour of FE. This I will do to my dying breath.

Trust me, you aren't doing the honor of FE any favors by "defending" it.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

vhu9644

  • 1011
  • +0/-0
  • Round earth supporter
Re: The moon
« Reply #72 on: March 06, 2011, 01:00:28 AM »
well, you have refused to answer the question, like 3 times, im pretty sure that i can say crustinator defends the honor of FE by avoiding questions

that will give a bad name to FE.

now, may you please answer the question?
people i respect: Ski, Oracle, PizzaPlanet, Wendy

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: The moon
« Reply #73 on: March 06, 2011, 06:50:05 AM »
now, may you please answer the question?

Yes.

?

vhu9644

  • 1011
  • +0/-0
  • Round earth supporter
Re: The moon
« Reply #74 on: March 06, 2011, 10:06:56 AM »
people i respect: Ski, Oracle, PizzaPlanet, Wendy

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11852
  • +10/-5
Re: The moon
« Reply #75 on: March 29, 2011, 08:17:35 PM »
After this thread was necro'd, I re-read the last part.LOLOL

 Crustinator for Prime Minister.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth