« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Legit. Question For FE'ers..?

  • 6 Replies
  • 3324 Views
?

believer23

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« on: November 22, 2009, 04:56:16 AM »
I understand how night and day is explained and your theories on that, but what about constellations? Like how you can see Orion during one half of the year but you can't the other half? =]
Logged
Burn The Land And Boil The Sea, You Can't Take The Sky From Me.
?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2009, 07:57:58 AM »
Quote from: Eddy Baby on November 22, 2009, 05:21:34 AM
Try the FEW. Celestial gears.

Celestial gears have been proved to be nonsense.
Logged
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.
?

believer23

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2009, 10:03:05 AM »
What is FEW? I don't know where to find it.
Logged
Burn The Land And Boil The Sea, You Can't Take The Sky From Me.
*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2009, 10:07:45 AM »

Please give me a link to a page that mentions the term 'celestial gear'.
Logged
*

parsec

  • 6176
  • +0/-0
  • 206,265
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2009, 10:12:21 AM »
this means i made an improper use of the search function. thnx.
Logged
?

believer23

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2009, 10:15:54 AM »
I read the wiki.. Sorry, I don't really get it. Anyone wanna translate for me in plain English? Sorry. >_<
Logged
Burn The Land And Boil The Sea, You Can't Take The Sky From Me.
?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Legit. Question For FE'ers..?
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2009, 12:22:04 PM »
Quote from: Eddy Baby on November 22, 2009, 07:59:17 AM
I wasn't aware. Could you post the thread?

Celestial gears would result in the angular distance between a star on one gear and a star on another gear changing on a cyclical basis. This cannot be observed happening and distance between stars changes only on the most infinitesimal level as seen from earth and not cyclically.
Given that the celestial gear idea therefore directly conflicts with what is observed, it is disproved.
Logged
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »