« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Regarding satellites

  • 12 Replies
  • 2391 Views
?

Sarren

  • 7
  • +0/-0
Regarding satellites
« on: January 31, 2009, 09:54:49 PM »
In your faq you state that satellites don't exist. Then how is it that we are able to see them in the night sky? Are telescopes actually producing a "fake image"?
Logged
*

Johannes

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2734
  • +0/-0
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2009, 10:58:51 PM »
Projectors
Logged
?

foolonthehill

Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2009, 12:03:57 AM »
lmao Projectors...nice. The main failure of this whole flat earth theory isn't it's departure from the norm...but rather the unnecessarily complicated solutions to everyday phenomena. You gotta find simpler theories man. Occam's razor you know?
Logged
?

Sarren

  • 7
  • +0/-0
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2009, 02:17:12 AM »
We don't have the technology to produce a high quality 3d image that is somehow viewable from any angle and any distance in the sky, also if anything were to move in the way the of the beam the image would be distorted.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2009, 06:39:37 AM »
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2009, 04:40:52 PM »
Quote from: foolonthehill on February 01, 2009, 12:03:57 AM
lmao Projectors...nice. The main failure of this whole flat earth theory isn't it's departure from the norm...but rather the unnecessarily complicated solutions to everyday phenomena. You gotta find simpler theories man. Occam's razor you know?

Occam's Razor is the biggest pile of shit ever spewed from the cavernous goatse-arsehole of pseudoscience. Do you know what that answer was? It was a joke. If you'd do a search, you'd find at least a hundred threads on this matter.
Logged
Quote from: Baseball4Life on April 16, 2010, 09:54:41 AM
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>
?

foolonthehill

Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2009, 06:47:21 PM »
lol err...it's not something that has an "answer". It's not a theorem that requires proof...it's a logical principle...quite a sensible one at that, which is more than what one can say about "projectors" lmao.
Logged
?

blackgoat

  • 33
  • +0/-0
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2009, 07:02:49 PM »
Quote from: Sarren on February 01, 2009, 02:17:12 AM
We don't have the technology to produce a high quality 3d image that is somehow viewable from any angle and any distance in the sky, also if anything were to move in the way the of the beam the image would be distorted.

bendy light. Bendy Light, BENDY LIGHT, BENDY LIGHT
Logged
?

Proleg

Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2009, 07:14:26 PM »


Statler: This is what we call a "medium thread".

Waldorf: A "medium thread"?

Statler: Yeah, it isn't rare and it certainly isn't well done!

Both: OHOHOHOHO!!!
Logged
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2009, 07:21:49 PM »
I chuckled... 
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
?

Proleg

Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2009, 08:12:50 PM »
Quote from: Ski on February 01, 2009, 07:21:49 PM
I chuckled... 
Waldorf: Yeah, it wasn't half bad.

Statler: You're right, it was all bad!

Both: OHOHOHOHOHO!!!
Logged
?

Sarren

  • 7
  • +0/-0
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2009, 09:42:10 AM »
Quote from: Proleg on February 01, 2009, 07:14:26 PM


Statler: This is what we call a "medium thread".

Waldorf: A "medium thread"?

Statler: Yeah, it isn't rare and it certainly isn't well done!

Both: OHOHOHOHO!!!

I guess I shouldn't have expected more from this forum. I come here and ask a serious question and all I get in reply are some half arsed answers and am mocked to cover the fact that your theories are flawed. The idea that the earth is flat is just absurd and the fact that you cling on to it like some 5 year old clings on to his imaginary friend is just sick.
Logged
*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Regarding satellites
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2009, 10:50:28 AM »
Did you even read the quote? Your thread isn't rare (i.e. do a fucking search, everybody asks the same serious question), and it isn't well done (i.e. GTFO)

If you have any other queries, either search or refer to the last word in the above paragraph.
Logged
Quote from: Baseball4Life on April 16, 2010, 09:54:41 AM
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »