REers, it's time to be more proactive!

  • 37 Replies
  • 6054 Views
?

cbarnett97

  • 2746
  • +0/-0
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #30 on: August 31, 2008, 03:57:33 AM »
proove is only in slang dictionaries.
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

?

Hammod

  • 154
  • +0/-0
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #31 on: August 31, 2008, 04:02:56 AM »
By answering your own question that you claimed would proove (actual spelling dickhead, use a dictionary, or they also part of the conspiracy) that the earth is round.

So obviously faked photography is now satisfactory evidence?

Also, http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/proove.
Less faked than anything I've seen from FE gallery.

Oh and since it doesn't appear in a wiki must make it true.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #32 on: August 31, 2008, 04:04:57 AM »
Less faked than anything I've seen from FE gallery.

I wasn't aware there were degrees of fallacy.

Oh and since it doesn't appear in a wiki must make it true.

Now remove one "o". You will notice that an entry appears in Wiktionary.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Hammod

  • 154
  • +0/-0
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #33 on: August 31, 2008, 04:06:52 AM »
Less faked than anything I've seen from FE gallery.

I wasn't aware there were degrees of fallacy.

It doesn't surprise me, you appear to be unaware of most things. Reality seems to be the one you struggle with the most.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #34 on: August 31, 2008, 04:14:01 AM »
Less faked than anything I've seen from FE gallery.

I wasn't aware there were degrees of fallacy.

It doesn't surprise me, you appear to be unaware of most things. Reality seems to be the one you struggle with the most.

Resorting to personal attacks, are we? In that case, I must ask that you move this to Angry Ranting. Make a thread in there flaming me all you want, but keep it out of General Discussion, please.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Hammod

  • 154
  • +0/-0
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #35 on: August 31, 2008, 04:17:03 AM »
Less faked than anything I've seen from FE gallery.

I wasn't aware there were degrees of fallacy.

It doesn't surprise me, you appear to be unaware of most things. Reality seems to be the one you struggle with the most.

Resorting to personal attacks, are we? In that case, I must ask that you move this to Angry Ranting. Make a thread in there flaming me all you want, but keep it out of General Discussion, please.
Hardly a personal attack.
However since you have answered your own question showing that the earth is round I agree that the thread is closed.

?

McKee

  • 183
  • +0/-0
Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2008, 05:38:20 AM »
Dear The One who took pictures..

Have you tried climbing up these ice walls, and taking a picture? Or where you scared the Horizon line might prove you wrong?
FET = Fake Earth Theory
RET = Real Earth Theory

And i wonder..Do penguins ever fall in space? Because that Ice Wall bust be pretty High!

Now it all makes sense!!! That's why we could never prove Santa!! He must be hiding at the Ice Wall!!

:D no

?

randypanda

Re: REers, it's time to be more proactive!
« Reply #37 on: September 01, 2008, 06:21:56 AM »
You could never get high enough in the hierarchy to expose the conspiracy.  Its an eliteist group.

That's a terribly negative attitude. My guess is you haven't really tried. Have you?


2. Buy whatever equipment is necessary to convince you that a straight line is straight (I guess GPS is out, but a theodelite should suffice), and organise your own expedition to the Antarctic. Come on guys, don't just sit there and compain that existing maps are rubbish, make a better one!

What exactly would this prove?

Well, this relates to a point made on another post, that all recorded cases of people traversing the Antarctic are either deliberte fakes or cases of GPS re-routing honest explorers around the circumference. Presumably, if you faced directly away from the centre of the earth and travelled in a verifiably straight line, than you are bound to hit the ice wall, or at least gather some concrete evidence of it being guarded. Of course, if you travel in a straight line and come out on the wrong side of the world, there is a problem with your theory, no?

I fly for a living.

How do you do it with no reliable maps or means of navigation?