FET regarding the sun. How is it possible??

According to the FAQ, the sun circles the earth at a height of 3,000 miles and operates like a spotlight.  If this is the case, how can it be daylight in both Alaska and Australia at the same time?  they are most definitely more than 7,000 miles apart, so in order for FET to be correct the sun would have to over 7,000 miles in diameter - funny thing is the FAQ says it is only 32 miles in diameter.

The obvious, and correct, answer is that the sun is much, much farther away, emits light in all directions and the RE's rotation is responsible for sunrises and sunsets.

Please don't say that I have never been in the two places at the same time to witness daylight.  I have travelled to Australia and have friends that live there.  When I lived in Anchorage, I would often call my friend in Brisbane and guess what - it was daytime in both locations  .

How do you explain this massive hole in FET???

there is also the tilt of the earth that as a result the north pole has 6 months of daylight and 6 months of darkness.. nothing ive read compensates for that.. or does the light magically grow and shrink.

Win for RE!

Why isn't it possible for the sun's circular spotlight to be over Australia and Alaska at once?

because the circular sun would have to cast an elliptical beam of light


corrected.

Win for RE!

its actually a win for FE because a win for RE would be a lie and a government consiracy. its only logical

because the circular earth would have to cast an elliptical beam of light

It's not too difficult to fit a circle over Australia and Alaska.

draw it on a map and show post it please

Not going to happen


Tom doesn't back anything up

Why isn't it possible for the sun's circular spotlight to be over Australia and Alaska at once?

Typical FE'r answer  .  Why can't you just admit the theory makes absolutely no sense.  Every time someone blasts a hole in FET, you respond with a simple "you are wrong" without providing any explanation as to why you think you are right.  Or you, as in in this case, you respond to a question with a question.

I very clearly explained why your theory is wrong.  If the sun was a spotlight 32 miles in diameter, it would be impossible for light to reach two places seperated by over 7,000 miles.  Clearly the sun is not a spotlight, it is much larger than 32 miles in diameter, it is millions of miles away - not 3,000 and the daylight cycle is due to our ROUND earth's rotation on it's axis.

of course not, that would be considered proof and that, too , is a government consipiracy.

also, i have had 2 threads get deleted already due to inability for the FEer to make excuses. expect this one to be deleted too.

also, i have had 2 threads get deleted already due to inability for the FEer to make excuses. expect this one to be deleted too.

Are you...suggesting...that there is a conspiracy *gasp* among FEers(!)... to hide all arguments that prove that their current theories to explain a FE could not be possible, shadowing their believers from the truth so many have tried to bring them?? Perhaps a FAQ should be compiled as to why some individuals would do this, how it would be done, and how deep the conspiracy would have to run... 

EDIT: syntax error