Stars

  • 33 Replies
  • 5132 Views
?

einstien

Re: Stars
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2008, 12:29:43 AM »
Much as I hate to use theoretic science (strictly, Tom is correct, we don't know), the idea has been advanced that the stars are the afterburns of distant planets.
Wow that might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You do know that the elements that our planet and all other planets came from early stars in the universe

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Stars
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2008, 02:42:14 AM »
Unless they didn't.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Paradox

  • 167
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars
« Reply #32 on: February 17, 2008, 03:12:36 AM »
"keyboard not detected. Press any key to continue"

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Stars
« Reply #33 on: February 19, 2008, 09:23:39 AM »
Wrong Tom, we can see what elements make them up with spectroscopes.

Spectrum Analysis is flawed.

http://books.google.com/books?id=GzkKAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA#PPA6,M1
You are flawed, Robot.

The correct answer is: The stars are like the sun, but a really really tiny. I mean seriously weeny.
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.