My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.
Just take a second and think how ridiculous a flat earth would look, surrounded by a giant ice wall. ha ha it makes me chuckle.
I should stop posting.
Rowbotham gives us the following peer reviewed pieces of evidence for a Flat Earth:Experiment 1Experiment 2Experiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 5Experiment 6Experiment 7Experiment 8Experiment 9Experiment 10Experiment 11Experiment 12Experiment 13Experiment 14Experiment 15Now where's your proof for a Round Earth?
Rowbotham has. His results are published. You are welcome to prove them wrong.
They were published. They are also easily accessable on the internet. It only took me about 2 minutes to find his actual studies on the internet for the first time.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
Quote from: narcberry on April 11, 2007, 01:46:56 PMRowbotham has. His results are published. You are welcome to prove them wrong.Um, the whole idea of someone else proving it (RE) and it not being "true" is what your whole FE theory is about. So, I can simple say, he never did those experiments, he just made it up (which is most likely the case). So, why don't YOU prove any RE experiment and picture wrong?
Quote from: Jesus Reborn on April 11, 2007, 02:01:26 PMQuote from: narcberry on April 11, 2007, 01:46:56 PMRowbotham has. His results are published. You are welcome to prove them wrong.Um, the whole idea of someone else proving it (RE) and it not being "true" is what your whole FE theory is about. So, I can simple say, he never did those experiments, he just made it up (which is most likely the case). So, why don't YOU prove any RE experiment and picture wrong?Because you'll dismiss my experiments as easily as you dismissed his. The fact is, you will dismiss all experiments other than your own. Many of his experiments are simple, I suggest you try one.