True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE

  • 39 Replies
  • 11448 Views
*

Splox

  • 76
  • +0/-0
« Last Edit: February 23, 2007, 05:34:28 PM by Splox »

?

RenaissanceMan

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #31 on: February 23, 2007, 06:15:38 AM »
Who are they?

I'm going with Bullhorn and Dionysios... find thier material in "Flat Earth Believers". "Lord Byron' is also there, but those are just reprints of older Dionysios posts.

Now, Dionsyios is full on, banana boat nuts... I don't think you can fake that kind of crazy. Bullhorn acts like he's been on drugs all day and simply makes no sense... he could be faking it. As to "Is this site serious?" No, I don't think so.

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2007, 05:10:28 PM »
Shameless Bump

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #33 on: February 23, 2007, 08:04:37 PM »
Another bump.  Cmon FE'ers.  What is your take on this?

Tom?

?

Tom Bishop

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #34 on: February 23, 2007, 08:15:56 PM »
The Southern Cross exists. But the Southern Cross is not a group of stars. It is actually composed of bright celestial bodies that move in tandem near the earth. Like many other celestial bodies, they move in predictable patterns. The Southern Cross was marked by observers in the Northern Hemidisk in pre-Christian times, and the four main bodies were said to represent the four pagan virtues—Justice, Fortitude, Temperance and Prudence. Early Chris­tians naturally accorded it a religious significance, and some of the early emigrants to South America regarded it as a good omen planted before them in the sky as an emblem of their faith.

The Southern Cross is unique among celestial bodies because it rotationally alters its position in the skies; and observed at the same time-say 9 o'clock—each night, throughout the year, this change can be seen quite distinctly. In May it stands upright almost overhead pointing Rimward, in August it lies further Widdershins on its side, by November it stands on its head near the horizon and due Rimward, and in February it lies on its side pointing Turnwise.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2007, 08:55:49 PM by Tom Bishop »

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #35 on: February 23, 2007, 08:59:12 PM »
The sourthern cross can be used at all times of year to find south in the southern hemisphere.  This is why it has such a cultural significance in the regions here in Australiasia.  Its position in the sky does change, but in the southern hemisphere its orientation does not change thus it can be used in navigation so significantly.

Would that mean its orientation, where seen in the northern hemisphere, is different?  Would that not mean the earth is not flat?

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #36 on: February 24, 2007, 04:36:04 PM »
Guess this should be added to the RE evidence that FEers want to ignore.

*

Rudd Master 3000

  • 452
  • +0/-0
  • Lil Kev
Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2007, 02:29:02 AM »
The sourthern cross can be used at all times of year to find south in the southern hemisphere.  This is why it has such a cultural significance in the regions here in Australiasia.  Its position in the sky does change, but in the southern hemisphere its orientation does not change thus it can be used in navigation so significantly.

Would that mean its orientation, where seen in the northern hemisphere, is different?  Would that not mean the earth is not flat?

It's orientation does change and it changes in the course of one night as it rotates across the sky. What doesn't change is where south ends up when you use the southern cross and the pointers to determine that direction.

Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #38 on: February 26, 2007, 04:07:07 AM »
yeah thats what i'm trying to say.  Your just saying it better.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: True/False proof of who is wrong: RE vs FE
« Reply #39 on: February 26, 2007, 04:25:29 AM »
I think it would be a good idea for the few people who actually think the Earth is flat to conduct such a test, yes. However, there are only about two people on these forums who actually seem to think the Earth is flat, and both of them seem thoroughly irrational.


Believe it or not, it's more like 8 or 9 these days  :o