1

Flat Earth Debate / Re: What are meteors, if space doesn't exist?

« Last post by JackBlack on Today at 01:43:18 AM »

Fighting fire with fire would be you providing evidence and logical arguments,

Yep, I agree, that's what I do.

No, you don't.
You are yet to present anything even remotely resembling evidence or logical arguments.
Instead you continue to spout nonsense and flee from logical arguments, as you have done yet again.

You are still incapable of explaining how the force is transferred/makes the other side move, without a pulling force.
And you are still incapable of explaining the observed polarity of magnets.

You're starting to mimic JB.

You mean he is easily showing how you are wrong, and not giving in to your BS?
You say that like its a bad thing.

I'm well aware how the word pull is used. I have no issue with it being used.
I would not say " oh there's no such thing as pull."

Sure you do, like when people say things are pulled down by gravity. It isn't just gravity you object to then, but also the idea of a pulling force.
You even object to such things by saying there is not such thing as a pulling force.

My argument is about a deeper process

A deeper process that you refuse to engage with because it shows you are wrong.
You have no interest in looking deeper at the link to consider how the force is transferred through the link (or other solid material).
Instead you want to take an extremely shallow view and just focus on one like pushing the next.

You are the one refusing to look at things here. And again, that is because you know that honestly looking at them so clearly and easily shows you are wrong.

Why don't you try looking at it more deeply for once and explain how the force is transferred?
Explain how the left side moves by pushing the right side right.
What is pushing the left side to make it move? We know it can't be the force that is pushing the right side as it is in the wrong direction.

2

Flat Earth General / Re: This earth is not the real world

« Last post by JackBlack on Today at 01:36:18 AM »

Incorrect Smoke Machine. Even brainwashed scientists now say that time is not linear. The past, present and future all exist at the same time. Time is rather an illusion. So yes traveling between different periods of time is very possible.

Complete non-sequitur, and it literally makes no sense.
How can different times exist at the same time?

It being non-linear simply means it doesn't pass at the same rate, and instead depends upon what you are doing.
A great example of this is the twin paradox.
It also means simultaneous events for one party may not be simultaneous for another.

That makes time relative, not an illusion.
And it doesn't make time travel possible.

Also, brainwashed people accepting believing something to be true is not a good argument for it being true.

3

Flat Earth General / Re: This earth is not the real world

« Last post by rvlvr on Today at 01:34:45 AM »

How is it done?

4

Flat Earth General / Re: Those search engines / a little flat earth evidence

« Last post by Stash on Today at 12:36:52 AM »

I am gaining a bit of an understanding that these probably are personalized srearch returns, but i am not so sure seeing as how rab once posted his search returns that were very similar to mien. I have a feeking this will record something interesting nonetheless som i'm gonna post it.

"Moon landing hoax" todays search returns

So what's your point exactly?

The point is you missed the boat like two yrs ago...hah hah just kidding. What pary was needing your clarification?

The part of what is it that you’re trying to figure out?

I’m guessing you want info on moon landings? Specifically the hoax side? And your disappointed with google search results. Even though it’s been explained to you how google parses results many many times.

There are things called books too. And there are a gazillion books about the hoax side of things. Go to a library. Search on Amazon. Stop using google if you don’t like it. Stop using YouTube if you don’t like it.

I just don’t see what your issue is and why you’re wasting your time with this.

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: What are meteors, if space doesn't exist?

« Last post by Shifter on Today at 12:22:48 AM »

The RDI of potassium is ~5g. To get that much every day requires a lot of eating. Usually a lot of carbs like in bananas and potatoes. I bought some potassium citrate powder to offset needing to eat all that

Bananas are a great food but only have about 1/10th of your potassium requirements

You can blend the peel too and drink it for more nutrients. Only did it once though. Despite nothing 'wrong' with it, it felt weird to do 

https://www.webmd.com/diet/health-benefits-banana-peel

6

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Air on a Flat Earth

« Last post by Solarwind on Today at 12:16:08 AM »

The container/dome is merely the end product of that stacking.

Tell me more about this container/dome. I can't find out much about it anywhere so where did you find about it?

7

Flat Earth General / Re: Those search engines / a little flat earth evidence

« Last post by faded mike on Today at 12:09:42 AM »

If anyone wants to copy and paste (and maybe format a little) their own duck duck go search returns for moonlanding hoax in the videos search - it would contribute greatly to the experiment. MWAH HA HAW. just kidding.

or other search engine returns

8

Flat Earth General / Re: Those search engines / a little flat earth evidence

« Last post by faded mike on Today at 12:00:53 AM »

I am gaining a bit of an understanding that these probably are personalized srearch returns, but i am not so sure seeing as how rab once posted his search returns that were very similar to mien. I have a feeking this will record something interesting nonetheless som i'm gonna post it.

"Moon landing hoax" todays search returns

So what's your point exactly?

The point is you missed the boat like two yrs ago...hah hah just kidding. What pary was needing your clarification?

9

Flat Earth General / Re: Those search engines / a little flat earth evidence

« Last post by faded mike on September 19, 2021, 11:56:09 PM »

I'm quite possibly wrong but i dont think they want to help you figure the flat earth thing out...hmm.

10

Flat Earth General / Re: Those search engines / a little flat earth evidence

« Last post by faded mike on September 19, 2021, 11:55:13 PM »

I am gaining a bit of an understanding that these probably are personalized srearch returns, but i am not so sure seeing as how rab once posted his search returns that were very similar to mien. I have a feeking this will record something interesting nonetheless som i'm gonna post it.

Most search engines attempt to provide relevant results.
This means they are personalised using whatever information is available.
That would include your search history and whatever links you have already clicked on (and other things like your IP).

If you have a VPN, try setting your exit node to one country, open an incognito window, and do a search.
Then close the incognito window, change the VPN exit node to a different country, and then open a new incognito window and do the same search.
Then do the same search in a normal window without a VPN.
See if you get the same results each time.

I also think Google Search has a bias towards YouTube.

I dont think it works that way with flat earth, but i may be wrong.

Sorry only read the first part of what you said, but yeah that sounds like an allstar plan actually. My cmptr is just kindof hatched (so to speak) right now...