1

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Orbits. How do they work?

« Last post by Unconvinced on Today at 11:39:12 AM »

I am genuinely interested to know how to leave LEO to arrive close to the moving Moon. I have asked the agencies several times but ... no reply.
That's why I wonder about it on the Internet?
Please explain to me how to fly to the Moon. No garbage links to ESA/NASA bullshit, please.

LOL

You claim that NASA and the ESA can’t say how to do it, but when I link to NASA and the ESA saying exactly how they do it suddenly you’re not interested and want me to explain instead?

Why?  I don’t run a space agency, I don’t launch any rockets.  Whether I can explain it or not is irrelevant.  What matters is if the people who actually do it can explain it.  And they can, despite all your lies that they can’t.

You don’t really want to know anything, you just want to arbitrarily reject it.  No possible answer I or anyone else give you could ever be good enough, you’ll always find some lame excuse and you know it. And that’s the real reason your “challenge” is such a joke.  No sane person would think for a second that you would pay up even if you really did have the money.  They’re all just laughing at your excuses.

Just like the rest of this sad bunch of conspiracy theorists-

“Ooh, look!  The flag’s waving!  NASA must have left the door to the sound stage open while there was a howling gale outside!”   

Pathetic.  The lot of you.

2

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

« Last post by Stash on Today at 11:05:53 AM »

We should probably see if we can ask to get this thread unstickied. Especially considering that Heiwa keeps seemingly breaking rule 3 and maybe 7 too.

3. Advertisements
Do not create threads/posts, send private messages, or use your profile to advertise products, services, etc.

- Constantly referring back to his site promoting his safety at sea business and his fake challenges.

7. Low-content Posting/Derailment
Do not make spammy, non-contributive or low-quality posts, or derail threads by deliberately dragging discussion away from the original topic.

- Perpetually bumping with no content just to get it to pop up after it lays dormant for a few days.

3

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Orbits. How do they work?

« Last post by Stash on Today at 10:58:30 AM »

Not seeing any calculations here.

Why not?

Tell you what, I’ll give you a million quid if you can prove it’s impossible with the correct calculations and stated specifications.

Topic is "Orbits. How do they work?"
It seems we all agree that an orbit is a circular or elliptical trajectory around Earth at a certain speed and altitude not to drop down on Earth again. Getting a satellite into orbit from Earth is easy and possible. French company Arianespace does it all the time. You use a rocket that catapults the satellite into the orbit (while the rocket drops back on Earth).
The problem is to get out of such an orbit intact. It is in fact impossible.
Of course there are 'experts' suggesting that you can go from one orbit to another, from e.g. around Earth, then around the Sun and finally start orbiting the Moon (or an assteroid) but such 'experts' do not work at Arianespace. European Space Agency, ESA, are full och such experts. And you can learn about it at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, at no cost. The professor says he has himself orbited Earth in a spacecraft many times but ... it is just fantasy. http://heiwaco.com/moontravela.htm

As Unconvinced pointed out, your 'evidence' seems to be that you called some professors in Sweden and they didn't return your phonecalls? What sort of evidence is that? Sounds simply like the rantings and ravings of a lunatic.

You say the calculations are wrong yet you have no calculations. So how would you know they are wrong? Because someone didn't return your vmail?

What are your calculations? Without them you have zero argument and just appear a crackpot.

Well, the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden offers three courses in space travel and I have informed three professors and their students there to earn €1M to describe a space trip to the Moon/Mars, etc ... no takers. Same offer has been done to US and Russian universities. No replies.
The only info available is that fuel is used for a space trip but not how, when, where and how it was used.
Questions remain - how to change high speed orbits and stop in orbits?

Something you don't seem to get:

1) Not getting a response to you vmails is in no way an admission of anything. Sheer lunacy to think so an unreturned vmail means all of a sudden, physics don't work.
2) If they happened to even bother to check you out and look at your website, they would be like, "Whoah, what's this conspiracy nut job all about?" I mean it's pretty apparent you're a wild conspiracy theorist. Why bother?

And as for "The only info available is that fuel is used for a space trip but not how, when, where and how it was used." That's just an out and out lie. I spent 5 minutes and found all of the fuel required and specs for the mission. As many others have. I could spend more time and get you the documentation that shows the when and where. Which you have already been given. Why do you lie?

You've been presented all of this info many times. You never provide any calculations as to why it's wrong. You just say experts don't return your calls. You're kind of batshit crazy in this regard. Everyone knows it. That's why no one wants to play in your made up sandbox.

Provide some calculations why it's wrong. It's the only place to legitimately start from. Otherwise, you're just whining about how no one will talk to you and you're just lonely in your conspiratorial thoughts.

You haven't studied my website and findings. Re going to the Moon experts suggest that you first arrive in LEO, i.e. an orbit at low altitude (200 000 m) at high speed (>7 km/s) and that then, in orbit, you fire a rocket engine during several minutes to increase velocity of the spacecraft (to >11.2 km/s) and proceed to a way point in space for a second modification of orbit several days later. However, there is no info about it, i.e. location, time, duration, force applied and its direction, etc. It is simply not possible to increase speed in orbit to arrive to another location in space a couple of days later. During the trip to the way point the velocity is reduced due to Earth gravity but  there is no way to calculate the arrival time. Finally, when arriving at the way point in space, you fire the rocket engine again to get out of the orbit around Earth to start orbiting the Moon! Not possible. It doesn't work like that.

There's plenty of info. A 30 second search yielded this about Apollo 10:

"After launch at 16:49:00 UT on 18 May 1969, the spacecraft was inserted into a 189.9 km x 184.4 km Earth parking orbit at 17:00:54 UT, followed by translunar injection after 1 1/2 orbits at 19:28:21 UT. The CSM separated from the Saturn V 3rd stage (S-IVB) at 19:51:42 UT, transposed, and docked with the LM at 20:06:37. After a three day cruise, Apollo 10 entered an initial 315.5 km x 110.4 km lunar orbit on 21 May 1969 at 20:44:54 UT, using a 356 sec. SPS burn. A second SPS burn lasting 19.3 seconds circularized the orbit to 113.9 km x 109.1 km."

And there's a ton more information. I've only scraped the surface.

So why do you flat out lie and say "However, there is no info about it, i.e. location, time, duration, force applied and its direction, etc."?

Because you haven't looked for the information therefore it doesn't exist. People have given you all of the info, fuel consumption, timing, rocket specs, force, trajectories, etc. Everything. And you lie and say the information doesn't exist? You are a very dishonest man.

Yes - but a translunar injection from an orbit around Earth is not possible. It is just typical NASA bullshit published as Fake News 1969 becoming history 2020.
Do you really know what an orbit is?

So the culmination of your lack of evidence, calculations and knowledge is that Rocket Scientists don't return your phonecalls and NASA is bullshit.? Well done. Way to play the crackpot card. How can you have a challenge when you have no way being able to say whether the challenge has been met or not? Like I said, you're a very dishonest person.

In any case. Here's all the information you've requested just to get you started:


http://www.braeunig.us/space/interpl.htm

There's a lot more there. It gives you all the data and calculations you need with examples for everything from earth to interplanetary orbits and how to move between them. And it's non-NASA, non-ESA.

Let us know where the calculations are incorrect and report back. Until you can figure that out, you have no challenge.

4

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Orbits. How do they work?

« Last post by Heiwa on Today at 10:56:28 AM »

I am genuinely interested to know how to leave LEO to arrive close to the moving Moon. I have asked the agencies several times but ... no reply.
That's why I wonder about it on the Internet?
Please explain to me how to fly to the Moon. No garbage links to ESA/NASA bullshit, please.

Yeah, ask them how to unmask secret lizard people and I bet you get the same answer.

That might give you a hint why people don't write you back.

Yes - plenty people are like that. Pure bullshit. What a crowd.
But topic is orbits. Do you know what an orbit is?

Do you?  Please explain what you think an orbit is.

Easy. Sputnik 1 was the first man made object orbiting planet Earth 1440 times back in summer 1959. USSR catapulted it into orbit using a big rocket. Everyone talked about it. Media reported, etc.
Sputnik was also the train that went around West Berlin after the Wall was built 1961 that you had to use if you lived in the wrong place in the East and couldn't cross West Berlin.
Where do you live? 

5

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Orbits. How do they work?

« Last post by JJA on Today at 09:49:55 AM »

I am genuinely interested to know how to leave LEO to arrive close to the moving Moon. I have asked the agencies several times but ... no reply.
That's why I wonder about it on the Internet?
Please explain to me how to fly to the Moon. No garbage links to ESA/NASA bullshit, please.

Yeah, ask them how to unmask secret lizard people and I bet you get the same answer.

That might give you a hint why people don't write you back.

Yes - plenty people are like that. Pure bullshit. What a crowd.
But topic is orbits. Do you know what an orbit is?

Do you?  Please explain what you think an orbit is. 

6

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

« Last post by Themightykabool on Today at 09:33:18 AM »

Because everytime you bump this POS thread i feel compelled to open and close just so i dont have it in my "inbox".

7

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

« Last post by Heiwa on Today at 09:04:22 AM »

It seems this thread is viewed about 500 times per day but that few viewers have any new comments to make. I wonder why.

Guests can't post, but their views are counted.

Thanks. Do you know what an orbit is?

8

Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: Orbits. How do they work?

« Last post by Heiwa on Today at 09:03:44 AM »

I am genuinely interested to know how to leave LEO to arrive close to the moving Moon. I have asked the agencies several times but ... no reply.
That's why I wonder about it on the Internet?
Please explain to me how to fly to the Moon. No garbage links to ESA/NASA bullshit, please.

Yeah, ask them how to unmask secret lizard people and I bet you get the same answer.

That might give you a hint why people don't write you back.

Yes - plenty people are like that. Pure bullshit. What a crowd.
But topic is orbits. Do you know what an orbit is?

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Qanon Conspiracy

« Last post by Themightykabool on Today at 08:52:26 AM »

I stumbled upon this today on Digg and am super into infographics so I thought it was worth checking out:

Interview with the Mapmaker
I spoke to the man who designed the QAnon and 5G infographics you’ve seen circulating online.
https://endoftheworld.substack.com/p/interview-with-the-mapmaker?utm_source=digg

Holy crap, these people are for realz. Here's one of his "maps"...Yikes...

Well, there’s certainly a lot jammed in there, but it’s just an image.

A crazy wall should be real wall in your house with pictures and newspaper cuttings pinned on it, connected by red string.

You don’t make your crazy wall in Microsoft Project.

Bah!

PS.  Fast & Furious? (Below George Soros in red near the bottom).  Now that I can get on board with.  How are these films so successful, hmmmm?

I agree, pretty disappointing. A crime wall should be an all consuming crisis that spills into every physical space in your life. This would have been more impressive:

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Qanon Conspiracy

« Last post by Themightykabool on Today at 08:49:58 AM »

 "women do not have penises".


I don't use either

Fake news post.

Haha