Recent Posts
I thought the Mueller Report made it pretty clear Trump did not collude with Russia, even if others were charged for varying reasons.
While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”
All answers are at my website.So what's the name of the ship that you tested and proved that the Estonia didn't sink as reported?I just tested what happens when you speed up in very severe weather and hit a wave. There is a noisy impact at the bow. Happens to all my ships so the crew know they have to slow down. Ships do no sink due to noisy impacts at the bow. My finding is that Estonia sank due to a serious hull leak and loss of buoyancy. Starting bilge pumps didn't help. This is what the crew reported and I believe them.
So what caused the serious hull leak and where in the hull did this leak occur?
And you didn't answer the question...
What was the name of teh ship that you performed your test on?
Totallackey is a troll, and fucking retards like JJA enable him all the time and allow him to destroy every thread/every discussion. He's literally just repeating the same bullshit everywhere, but for some reason people like JJA don't get it and still engage in a 'discussion' with him everytime. I remember the times when noobs like JJA weren't here and everyone just ignored lackey.
You are shitposting your own thread.
The image of comet 17PHolmes you provided cannot be true, since NO TAIL WAS OBSERVED RIGHT ON THAT DAY.
The real facts are these:
https://www.space.com/4544-obscure-comet-brightens-suddenly.html
No tail
Comet Holmes is not as dramatic as some, lacking the characteristic tail that makes some of these frozen wanderers so beautiful. Instead, it appears as a fuzzy, albeit distinct, starlike object, but with no noticeable tail.
https://webs.ucm.es/info/Astrof/obs_ucm/cometas/Cometa_17P_Holmes.html
The comet has no tail, a remarkable golden color, and october 24 it shocked astronomers with a spectacular eruption, brightening almost a million-fold from 17th to 2.5th magnitude in a matter of hours.
Astronomers around the world agree, Comet 17P/Holmes is one of the strangest things ever to explode in the night sky.
http://www.ing.iac.es/PR/SH/SH2007/holmes.html
The Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) pointed to the comet just after sunset on the following night to the outburst, and it detected a highly centrally condensed coma with no signs of a tail.
https://www.nature.com/news/2007/071026/full/news.2007.195.html
The reason that comet 17P Holmes brightened so suddenly isn’t yet known; this comet doesn't have a tail.
https://sci.esa.int/web/observational-astronomy/-/41491-unexpected-brightening-of-comet-17p-holmes
Although it is bright, comet 17P/Holmes does not have a distinctive tail.
These are the facts of mainstream science.
Comet 17PHolmes had no tail whatsoever for weeks at a time.
http://www.ing.iac.es/PR/SH/SH2007/holmes.html
This reference uses the press releases from exactly October 31, 2007 to state the facts.
It says very clearly:
The Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) pointed to the comet just after sunset on the following night to the outburst, and it detected a highly centrally condensed coma with no signs of a tail.
More proofs:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/31
As a reference point, we assume a spherically symmetric coma in which the number density of dust grains varies with the inverse square of the distance from the nucleus.
Eruption of material from a localized surface source would more naturally produce a jet or a cone, not a spherical debris cloud or one that appeared symmetric in projection onto the sky. (It is sometimes argued that projection effects would hide deviations from circular symmetry because of the small phase angles of observation but, in fact, with an average phase angle ~0.2 radian, (see Figure 1) any strong asymmetries would easily have been detected if present).
ABSOLUTELY AND POSITIVELY COMET 17P/HOLMES HAD NO TAIL WHATSOEVER FOR WEEKS AT A TIME (OCTOBER 10, 2007 - NOVEMBER 4, 2007).
THE COMA WAS COMPLETELY UNAFFECTED BY THE SOLAR WIND.
The comet is an unprecedented half a million times brighter than before the eruption began. This amazing eruption of the comet is produced by dust ejected from a tiny solid nucleus made of ice and rock, only 3.6 km (roughly 2.2 miles) in diameter.
How does such a gravitationally minuscule body hold in place a uniform, spherical coma 7 million kilometers in diameter?
How could it maintain a spherical shape against the effects of the solar wind?
The unexplained ability of a relatively minuscule comet nucleus to hold in place a highly spherical coma, up to millions of miles in diamater, against the force of the solar wind.
Not gonna lie, I'm not even gonna read this thread. I intend to continue wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to better ensure my health and safety and that of others.Don't listen to me.
I ain't gonna listen to some bozo trying to tell me otherwise on the Flat Earth Society forums.
You are shitposting your own thread.
The image of comet 17PHolmes you provided cannot be true, since NO TAIL WAS OBSERVED RIGHT ON THAT DAY.
Totallackey is a troll, and fucking retards like JJA enable him all the time and allow him to destroy every thread/every discussion. He's literally just repeating the same bullshit everywhere, but for some reason people like JJA don't get it and still engage in a 'discussion' with him everytime. I remember the times when noobs like JJA weren't here and everyone just ignored lackey.Even you cannot ignore me when you post stuff like this in support of masks being effective:
CDC numbers are not to be trusted.Keep believing the reported death totals.I do not listen to known liars, especially those purporting to offer sound medical guidance.
Weren't you the one asserting that there would be no more than 60K deaths? How's the tally working out for you guys? I suppose all the deaths are from totally unrelated causes? LOL
As opposed to a paranoid Trump and his delusional cult followers? Dont mind if I do!
When you get money for reported cases and deaths, then you are going to fudge the numbers.Keep ignoring the fact hospitals receive 11k for reported infections and 30k for reported deaths in the US.
Yeah, care costs money.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/hospital-payments-and-the-covid-19-death-count/
Too bad for you that no evidence has been found of fraud
Also where do you get your info that if they die they get a $30K bonus? All I see is they get more if they are on a ventilator. I doubt the hospital sticks people on ventilators for no reason at all lol. You really are whacko
Yeah, you can because up to this point, death was not something celebrated by morons like you every time the news came out.Trust this money would not in any way give rise to false diagnosis or misattributed deaths.
Yeah, I'd trust a medical professional sooner than I'd trust some troll / alt on the internet thanks. I'm pretty sure in a developed country you cant just 'make up' a cause of death and get away with it either. Especially on the scale you are talking about
If by trolling, you mean stating truthful responses to your posts, then you would be correct.Low effort trolling as usualIf I were in America, I'd be treating everyone like they were lepers!Yes and most people here in the US would naturally be treating you the same way and for good reason.
