31
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Explain!!!!!!
« on: March 12, 2007, 10:03:41 AM »
I PPLZ AT WIKI LIEZ.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
relitivity even tho they are horribly misquoting the theory!What part of Relativity have I 'misquoted'?
hello another slightly off topic point here i hope someone can sort out. FE theory states that the reason things dissappear on the horizon is because they just get so small we cannot see them! if this is the case when i got myself and my brother both to watch a boat sailing off to france (i am english) i had a high powered pair of binoculars he had his eyes we both saw the boat dissappear at the same time?
Because only certain elements are effected by it.Yet the Moon and Sun are still up above us, circling the Earth?Yes, because they are being accelerated by the Universal Accelerator.
So why isnt other matter? Such as when I drop a ball?
Great question, since the lava would have to push out, and since we are moving up very fast, How are mountains and volcanoes formed, why wouldn't there be big deep holes and large mountains on the flipside.
And no, no shadow object can hide this.
Yet the Moon and Sun are still up above us, circling the Earth?Yes, because they are being accelerated by the Universal Accelerator.
Indeed, triangulation just seems like a more cost-effective alternative.Technically its the only option, since satellites are not possible.
Read War and Peace yet? That proves the Earth is round* , but its hard to find, find it.
That book should be long enough to keep him off the forums for a while
I bet he's the only one in the room.
Haha, at one point you can hear the faint sound of a feminine laugh, I think.
So we can narrow it down to two possibilities, either his plane went down (in one way or another, maybe the ice wall guards got him or he got some trouble with the plane), the other possibility is that he flew over the edge. I would like some serious comments on this.
There are more, you stated yourself 3 reasons at the start of the thread.
Anyway, anyone can go to the North pole now, Amundsen would have left something there when he went, Im pretty sure its not there but at the South Pole??
I ruled our the possibility that Amundsen was in on the conspirocy.
You continiue questioning my documentation, its no point arguing any more about this.And if ye are so sceptical to my documentation, I wanna discuss what would happen if ye flew against the ice wall in 1928. Did the guards have so advanced technology already then? (NASA as one off the major corporations in the conspiracy was established on July 29, 1958)
I hate repeating myself; I wanna discuss what would happen if ye flew against the ice wall in 1928.
Then I can make my own theory off what happened.
What about moon rocks? They are rocks from the moon. Is this some kind of weird RE code-word for something?
According to what another RE idiot just posted on another thread, the moon has an atmosphere. So go figure.
Sop how come we never see quotes or proofs from all these amazing pieces of "literature"?
It's all over this forum you ignorant sheeple. Either follow the steps or get the fuck out.
MooBs, you need to stop being lazy and read the book Earth Not a Globe. We're tired of holding your hand through the basic principles of Flat Earth Theory. Each of those discrepancies are accurately explained within its literature.
Thats what i wondered. I found it once... then i forgot it. Maybe ill find it again. Eh. maybe not. im boring.dammit. Read the link. The risk isnt that high. Its even lower with medication. One dose of medicine for baby and mom cuts the risk in half by 50% in some cases. If the baby was 100% getting HIV/AIDS, why would they artificially inseminate these women, and not have a huge firestorm of controversy surrounding it?no it ISNT. wait... or is it HIV. Neways... it is NOT 100% that a baby of an aids infected woman will get aids... or maybe HIV... ill find out.CORRECT WOLFIE! Since it's not even 100% the baby will GET aids if the mom has it.
Yes it is, unless the only bodily fluid used in the formation of the baby is saliva.
There is no sure fire way to stop the spread of AIDs, or to even slow it down. Even if you shoot those people in the head and burn their corpse, if you get any form of spinal fluid from them onto/into you you can potentially get the disease yourself.
Pretty sure the child is infected with the HIV from a parent who has either HIV or AIDs. The HIV might evolve into AIDs while the child is in the womb but in all cases that child is royally fucked.
Meh I was wrong.
Still I wonder how the child isn't infected if the child is being created using the mother's blood and other bodily fluids...