Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Government

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
61
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: 2 pics of the clipse
« on: March 03, 2007, 06:38:58 PM »
the government put the ultra-conspiracy lens 5000 secretly on my camera so everytime i take a pic of the moon it becomes blurry

62
Flat Earth Q&A / 2 pics of the clipse
« on: March 03, 2007, 05:01:05 PM »

63
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: satellite phones
« on: March 03, 2007, 02:01:47 PM »
if the earth ran out and started to fall, why would it fall, unless there was something called *dun* *Dun* *DUN* Gravity!

64
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: satellite phones
« on: March 03, 2007, 12:31:29 PM »
Why cant you lot just find one theory and all agree to stick to it? Cos all the FE'ers keep disagreeing with each other all the time which undermines the whole theory

RE scientists disagree with each other on the mechanisms for observable phenomena all the time. Why shouldn't FE proponents hold different views?

Because you disagree on the stupidest things like the existence or non-existence of satellites. Thats something that can easily be verifed. Normal scientists disagree on more complex things

I just started to type that... Plus, they are SCIENTISTS... tom is just some weirdo civillian

65
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: satellite phones
« on: March 03, 2007, 12:24:18 PM »
They say they the signal comes from raidio and cell phone towers, which is complete BS cause i know 3 people who construct such towers and they dont agree.

66
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Time to Speak Out
« on: March 03, 2007, 08:22:02 AM »
Quote
You fit a theory to a theory, not a theory to observations.  That's neither science nor blind faith, it's just stupid.

RE fits new theories into existing theories all the time.

See:
    String Theory
    Special Relativity
    Newtonian Optics
    Conservation of Mass
    Celestial Mechanics
    Kepler's Laws
    Plate Tectonics
    Theory for the form of the earth, including isostacy

hmm, add hundreds of pictures and videos to that list too  ::)

"Hundreds"?  Try "millions".

well, i dont think there are millions of videos, thats why i said hundreds... but yea there are millions of pictures

67
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Time to Speak Out
« on: March 03, 2007, 08:06:56 AM »
Quote
You fit a theory to a theory, not a theory to observations.  That's neither science nor blind faith, it's just stupid.

RE fits new theories into existing theories all the time.

See:
    String Theory
    Special Relativity
    Newtonian Optics
    Conservation of Mass
    Celestial Mechanics
    Kepler's Laws
    Plate Tectonics
    Theory for the form of the earth, including isostacy

hmm, add hundreds of pictures and videos to that list too  ::)

68
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 08:05:01 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch
Im pretty sure their IS consequence for killing and being immoral and such in reincarnation.
not really. Cuz then i would be a moral less killing fella, and have low self esteem.

nice thought tho eh?

what if it was socially acceptable?
in what kind of society would that be socially acceptable? i mean... come on... thats a bit to far fetched to entertain...

I was joking
and i was being difficult. its whut i DOoooooooooOooOOOOOOoOooooo


Your mom is difficult.. OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhh, ya fuckin DUN SON!
uhm... that doesnt make sense... Im gay, and ironically have 2 dads.

well, you didnt have to admit that, but ok

69
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 07:36:36 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch
Im pretty sure their IS consequence for killing and being immoral and such in reincarnation.
not really. Cuz then i would be a moral less killing fella, and have low self esteem.

nice thought tho eh?

what if it was socially acceptable?
in what kind of society would that be socially acceptable? i mean... come on... thats a bit to far fetched to entertain...

I was joking
and i was being difficult. its whut i DOoooooooooOooOOOOOOoOooooo


Your mom is difficult.. OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhh, ya fuckin DUN SON!

70
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 07:10:43 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch
Im pretty sure their IS consequence for killing and being immoral and such in reincarnation.
not really. Cuz then i would be a moral less killing fella, and have low self esteem.

nice thought tho eh?

what if it was socially acceptable?
in what kind of society would that be socially acceptable? i mean... come on... thats a bit to far fetched to entertain...

I was joking

71
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 06:21:04 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch
Im pretty sure their IS consequence for killing and being immoral and such in reincarnation.
not really. Cuz then i would be a moral less killing fella, and have low self esteem.

nice thought tho eh?

what if it was socially acceptable?

72
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 06:13:15 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch
Im pretty sure their IS consequence for killing and being immoral and such in reincarnation.

nice thought tho eh?

73
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Oh wow, a relatively important, not-spam thread!
« on: March 03, 2007, 06:09:46 AM »
Look at the data I supplied and do the time zone conversions. 23:20 UTC = 11:20PM Greenwich, England.

So for Eastern Standard Time (EST, East Coast USA) I would be -5 GMT, which is 11:20PM minus 5 hours which puts me at 6:20PM.

Use that example as the basis to figure out your time the eclipse occurs at, and then if you can even see it.

yea but it says we can see it at moon rise, which would put it earlier than 6 wouldnt it?

74
The Lounge / Re: What would you like to be in your next life?
« on: March 03, 2007, 06:00:10 AM »
a gang banger

edit: it would be funny as hell if reincarnation was true(not saying it isnt, we dont know) and everyone enventually knows about reincarnation and there is no consequences for killing or anything like that, it would be like a big ass halo 2 deathmatch

75
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Oh wow, a relatively important, not-spam thread!
« on: March 03, 2007, 05:57:10 AM »
actually im pretty sure we can only see it at a little after 3 (east coast)

76
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Oh wow, a relatively important, not-spam thread!
« on: March 03, 2007, 05:51:16 AM »
Ill try to..



77
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Issues w/ FE NEVER Resolved...
« on: March 03, 2007, 05:46:49 AM »
Back to my three unresolved issues, I am most interested to hear about them from FE'ers.  I doubt me raising these issues would immediately cause you to change your beliefs.  However, admitting you don't know an answer to these, or at least admitting these are good arguments, would be a good step in the right direction.


they most likely wont

Im confused if they think the sun/moon are flat also... if they are then how come we see the face and not the rim (according to the model)

78
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Asteroids and Comets
« on: March 02, 2007, 04:55:30 PM »
Big bang is just as disprovable as God

79
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Intelligent question...
« on: February 28, 2007, 04:12:41 PM »
Are there guard rails right at the edge for added saftey incase you happen to break thru?

80
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Undisputable proof that the Earth is round
« on: February 27, 2007, 06:17:39 PM »
No, but the signals could have come from anywhere.   Other aircraft, stratellites, ground stations, vehicles, etc...

they could, but probably not

81
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: shouldnt it be vise versa?
« on: February 27, 2007, 04:41:01 PM »
lol yea the NASA guys are badass for sayin the earth is round, when it isnt!

82
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Please Read and answer(FE'ers)...
« on: February 27, 2007, 12:20:44 PM »
bump

83
Flat Earth Q&A / Please Read and answer(FE'ers)...
« on: February 26, 2007, 05:53:00 PM »
Ok, i know i havent conducted myself properly at all, and i want to apologize. I do, however wish to be able to continue to dispute and post things i might think prove a round earth.

Anyways, i have a question:

How do large meteors that strike the earth affect it? Does the earth hit the meteor or are they both moving towards eachother? If it was large enough and it was moving towards earth, would it not significantly damage earth considering the earth is moving at 1g and the meteor is probably going a lot faster?

84
Firstly, you are aware that flying over the north pole is perfectly possible on a FE, yes?

Second, those are some nice pictures, but the curvature in them is nothing more than a trick of the camera, as no curvature is visible whatsoever from that altitude.

I think you fail to appreciate just how big Earth really is in either model.

you too are also and idiot

for about every 5 miles, the earth 'drops' about 16 feet i think where you see the curves is well over 5 miles long

I did all the calculations out of the post to skip to the point

85
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Indisputable Evidence
« on: February 26, 2007, 05:44:07 PM »
Those are obviously paintings used by the government or a plant to allow us to think this way.

Evidence or get out!

yea they have super advanced oil pastels

86
yea and they think when you post a pic of the horizon, they think the actual horizon spans across about 50 or 60 feet

I suggest you do a mathematical calculation of the amount of curvature visible at some altitude.  It's been done many times on this forum.  You should do it yourself if you can't search or don't believe anyone else. 

I did do it myself, why dont you search my posts

87
hmmm... wonder why the FE'rs havent flooded this thread

88
yea and they think when you post a pic of the horizon, they think the actual horizon spans across about 50 or 60 feet

89
Yea and the gov't put conspiracy lenses on all types of cameras to only make the horizon appear curved

90
But im gonna post it anyway





and this


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9