Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sceptimatic

Pages: 1 ... 829 830 [831] 832 833 ... 852
24901
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 10:12:39 AM »
Anyway, all you budding , brave Astronaut wannabes. How many of you would like to take off from the moon in this piece of crap cardboard and tin foil school kids project?




24902
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 10:07:20 AM »
Explain, with a diagram, why the earth and moon won;t piss off once a rocket leaves earths' atmosphere into space.
Because (as explained already) it's still traveling along with the system.

Yes, it's magic.
So it's going 67,000 mph and yet moving forward about 5000 mph toward to the moon and yet keep the same orbit as Earth. Yep, in fantasy world it's feasible.

24903
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 09:59:39 AM »


These can travel 17000 kms across the Pacific Ocean. Just because it does not appear how you think it should does not mean it is incapable.
Oh well there you go then, solved it in one. Well done.

24904
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 09:59:06 AM »
my god sceptic!! i am struck down in awe by how advanced a human bieng you are you must be the most evolved person on on this forum. good on you!!!

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2012/11/were_getting_li.html
Thanks but I can't blow my own trumpet like that.  ;)

24905
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 08:10:53 AM »
Hands up who thinks this piece of crap lifted off from the moon.




24906
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 03:51:14 AM »
The rocket is on the earth and traveling at 63,000 mph. When it lifts off it is still going at 63,000 mph plus what ever speed it has reached due to take off. How is that hard to understand. Where in the journey from earth to space does it lose the origional 63,000 mph it origionaly had while on earth?
Yes, it's all magical isn't it. I knew the answer was this, just as it is on earth with everyone going around it all attached to an invisible atmosphere.

This is how Voyager works as well isn't it.
It leaves earth at 67,000 mph , plus the speed it was launched at and then flies through space at 67,000 mph in one direction and 20 odd thousand miles an hour in another direction, all relative to earth of course, regardless of it supposedly being millions of miles into space.

 ::)

24907
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 03:34:41 AM »
So there we have it folks. The moon landings never happened and no man has ever been in space or outside of Earths' atmosphere.
This is the magic that scientists have us believe.

Let's look at all the things they tell us that go against logic, yet anyone disputing it, are ridiculed.
We are to believe that we are spinning on a 1000 mph earth, even though we all know that we would be catapulted off of it, so they counteract that argument with "oh , it's gravity, plus the atmosphere keeping you on the deck and give out ridiculous calculations for it, regardless of not knowing what the hell gravity is and how the atmosphere supposedly grips a solid earth to rotate exactly with it.
Everything that we know about earth was supposedly calculated hundreds and hundreds of years ago and are accepted in the main as being correct, regardless of them simply being hypothesis.

Foucaults' pendulum is supposed to be the one early proof of a rotating earth, where a long plumb bob type line was hung from a church ceiling and put into a swinging motion where it slowly moved in a spiral sort of way, yet Aireys' experiment to prove Earth is stationary and it's the stars and Sun that's moving was rejected. What gives one person precedence over the other in that day?

In the 1960's, we had the Saturn V, which was so successful that it was capable of taking massive payloads, not just into space...this could also achieve a moon landing with the inner equipment it was carrying, such as a command module.
The number of separations needed by exploding bolts after bolts from segments was a feat in itself. Magical you could call it.
Apart from the Saturn V itself separating into a few parts just to get into space, the top then separated, then the command module would go towards the moon, then un-dock a lunar lander, which would go head first towards the moon.
Once near the moon, it would then do a 180 degree turn with it's legs facing the moon and fire it's main engine, then it saunters down to the moon, effortless, although some will argue that Neil Armstrong manually steered it down when he saw they were going to land in a crater.lol

Once on the moon and doing the flag planting and what not, they depart with the top of the lander exploding some bolts to escape the bottom part of the lander.

Once away from the moon, they find the command module and effortlessly dock with it, then climb into it and discard the top part of the lander.

Now it's time to head back to earth, where the command module takes them close to earth, then the back part separates, leaving just a little cone, which then hits the atmosphere of the earth and somehow steers itself down, despite it being just a silly cone, which should have violently flung those cramped Astro liars all over the place.
Once the cone reaches a certain height, regardless of the speed they would be coming in at...parachutes then release and slowly guide them into the sea, where a waiting helicopter and divers are at the ready to winch them up and on board a waiting ship, where they are immediately put into quarantine, whilst the craft they landed in, is left to float all of the little space viruses along the ocean.lol

Anyway, a nice big sturdy big payload carrying monster is replaced by a shuttle that can withstand the vigours the friction of getting out of our atmosphere and back into it, time and time and time again, with the odd tile change and a few burn marks wiped off.
This amazing craft can be bolted onto a large central tank, which is then bolted to 2 large outer solid fuel rocket boosters, which can be re-used.

One thing the space shuttle can't do, is land on the moon, due to weight and fuel I would imagine.
Anyway, this amazing shuttle take about the same time to get to the space station as it does for the Apollo Astro liars to get to the moon. Hmm.  ::)

Anyway, the shuttle is deemed so efficient, it's used for 30 odd years and never ever needed any change to it, to match time ticking away.
A bit like one of us hanging onto our old style ford cortina and refusing to go with the times.

You would think we would have housing estates on the moon by now wouldn't you, with many people owning allotments and what not but yet, all we have to show for it, is a few scattered chunks of scrap laid about that no telescope on earth or space can actually pick up, except as some kind of dot that says that is a lunar lander set of legs.

So there you have it. The 1960's may have looked backward in the technological stakes but as we can see, it pisses all over todays' where conquering space is concerned.  ::)



24908
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 02:21:45 AM »
but your explanations do not stand up at all

Actually they do. That's why I'm using them....

And what don't you understand about voyager? It's pretty straight forward.
Of course it's straight forward. Everything is straight forward to you people. Pure magic is straight forward to you.
You cannot stump what I've just said. If you can, then explain it to me by drawing a diagram.

Yep, that's logic alright. And I can't refute your argument If you don't have one. Form a logical argument about... something about Voyager you were saying?
I''l explain Voyager when you try and get out of this explanation I gave, plus diagram.
Pointless trying to change it as I won't be backing off unless you can trump me on it, which you can't.
What? I'm confused. You won't explain your voyager question until I answer your voyager question? With a diagram?
Forget Voyager for now, I'll come to that later.
Explain, with a diagram, why the earth and moon won;t piss off once a rocket leaves earths' atmosphere into space.

Oh THAT? I already explained that. A cruse MS paint drawing wouldn't even get my point across, so you'll just have to use your brain :/ Maybe you forgot to read:

Yes it does. the moon is even farther away from the earth than the rocket and it doesn't get left behind. Why? Inertia. The entire area enclosed by the moon orbit is like one big system. It all kinda stays together and everything in it is going 67000 mph. Even rockets trying to reach the moon.

Now onto voyager, what are you talking about...
My conversation with you is over, no need to reply.

24909
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:57:20 AM »
but your explanations do not stand up at all

Actually they do. That's why I'm using them....

And what don't you understand about voyager? It's pretty straight forward.
Of course it's straight forward. Everything is straight forward to you people. Pure magic is straight forward to you.
You cannot stump what I've just said. If you can, then explain it to me by drawing a diagram.

Yep, that's logic alright. And I can't refute your argument If you don't have one. Form a logical argument about... something about Voyager you were saying?
I''l explain Voyager when you try and get out of this explanation I gave, plus diagram.
Pointless trying to change it as I won't be backing off unless you can trump me on it, which you can't.
What? I'm confused. You won't explain your voyager question until I answer your voyager question? With a diagram?
Forget Voyager for now, I'll come to that later.
Explain, with a diagram, why the earth and moon won;t piss off once a rocket leaves earths' atmosphere into space.

24910
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:51:09 AM »
but your explanations do not stand up at all

Actually they do. That's why I'm using them....

And what don't you understand about voyager? It's pretty straight forward.
Of course it's straight forward. Everything is straight forward to you people. Pure magic is straight forward to you.
You cannot stump what I've just said. If you can, then explain it to me by drawing a diagram.

Yep, that's logic alright. And I can't refute your argument If you don't have one. Form a logical argument about... something about Voyager you were saying?
I''l explain Voyager when you try and get out of this explanation I gave, plus diagram.
Pointless trying to change it as I won't be backing off unless you can trump me on it, which you can't.

24911
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:44:02 AM »
but your explanations do not stand up at all

Actually they do. That's why I'm using them....

And what don't you understand about voyager? It's pretty straight forward.
Of course it's straight forward. Everything is straight forward to you people. Pure magic is straight forward to you.
You cannot stump what I've just said. If you can, then explain it to me by drawing a diagram.

24912
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:28:38 AM »
Hi sceptimatic. I am a big fan of your art, all your paintings turn out  beautifully. I am currently watching your lector here  - which is incredible useful by the way! - but my question is: Are your paintings copyrighted? I am considering using them in my memoir.

Respectfully yours
Dr.Nor and family
Use anything you want, what I put up Dr.Nor.

24913
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:25:26 AM »
This is sad really. The earth is moving at what, 67,000 mph. The satellites is moving in the same direction at the same speed, and therefor they stay the same distance from each other, the only changes being in the satellite's orbit.
You should really understand the basics before ridiculing a subject, although I just hope you're a troll...
You will not get out of this one lightly.
I won't let this one lie. Expect diagrams.
You will find it difficult to refute what I'm going to say, yet I can bet my bottom dollar, you and others will come out with something stupid. ;D

I just proved you wrong. ???
Seriously the only problem anyone might be having is understanding how you are viewing the world we live in.
The only problem people are having of viewing what I'm saying, is people like you.

That doesn't even make sense, and nice job side-stepping the fact that you don't understand inertia and relative velocity and that you know you're wrong.
Inertia is fine but it doesn't apply in this instance.

Yes it does. the moon is even farther away from the earth than the rocket and it doesn't get left behind. Why? Inertia. The entire area enclosed by the moon orbit is like one big system. It all kinda stays together and everything in it is going 67000 mph. Even rockets trying to reach the moon.
Why is Voyager supposedly still flying millions and millions of miles into space then?
The Moon landings are a crock of shit and the spinning round earth going around a massive Sun is another absolute crock of shit.
Of course I expect explanations for anything I put up but your explanations do not stand up at all and you are well aware of that.
Either that or you are simply comatose to it all.

24914
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:11:10 AM »
If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

Actually, it's even more complicated than that because the Apollo craft isn't traveling at a constant velocity.  The earth's gravitational field is tugging at the spacecraft, slowing it somewhat until it can reach a point where the moon's gravitational field becomes strong enough to start accelerating the craft towards the moon.
Sod the gravitational field, this has nothing to do with what I'm talking about and you know it.

Actually it has everything to do with what you're talking about and you know it. Jk you don't know anything haha.

He's basically saying even though you think it's so hard to get to the moon that it's impossible, it's even more complicated than that and we've STILL been to the moon.
It has nothing to do with what I'm talking about really.

24915
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:09:55 AM »
If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

Actually, it's even more complicated than that because the Apollo craft isn't traveling at a constant velocity.  The earth's gravitational field is tugging at the spacecraft, slowing it somewhat until it can reach a point where the moon's gravitational field becomes strong enough to start accelerating the craft towards the moon.
Sod the gravitational field, this has nothing to do with what I'm talking about and you know it.
I'm just saying that there is more to calculating a proper trajectory from the earth to the moon than you think.  When you're trying to hit a moving target that's  a quarter of a million miles away, even small changes in velocity can be significant.
Calculating is fine but we don't have 67,000 mph craft, so it doesn't matter which way anything is calculated.
Once the rocket leaves earth, the earth, plus the moon are racing away from it at 67,000 mph, so even if the rocket was calculated to chase the moon, it's like the fat kid (rocket) in a race against the athletes (earth and moon)..he's simply not going to catch them.

It's like jumping out of a car that's going twice or three times faster than you can run. Once you jump out...that car keeps on going, leaving you behind, yet you can try and run after it but the car will be moving away, further and further, as your speed cannot match it's speed.

24916
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:01:38 AM »
This is sad really. The earth is moving at what, 67,000 mph. The satellites is moving in the same direction at the same speed, and therefor they stay the same distance from each other, the only changes being in the satellite's orbit.
You should really understand the basics before ridiculing a subject, although I just hope you're a troll...
You will not get out of this one lightly.
I won't let this one lie. Expect diagrams.
You will find it difficult to refute what I'm going to say, yet I can bet my bottom dollar, you and others will come out with something stupid. ;D

I just proved you wrong. ???
Seriously the only problem anyone might be having is understanding how you are viewing the world we live in.
The only problem people are having of viewing what I'm saying, is people like you.

That doesn't even make sense, and nice job side-stepping the fact that you don't understand inertia and relative velocity and that you know you're wrong.
Inertia is fine but it doesn't apply in this instance.

24917
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 13, 2013, 12:58:44 AM »



24918
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 04:05:44 PM »
This is sad really. The earth is moving at what, 67,000 mph. The satellites is moving in the same direction at the same speed, and therefor they stay the same distance from each other, the only changes being in the satellite's orbit.
You should really understand the basics before ridiculing a subject, although I just hope you're a troll...
You will not get out of this one lightly.
I won't let this one lie. Expect diagrams.
You will find it difficult to refute what I'm going to say, yet I can bet my bottom dollar, you and others will come out with something stupid. ;D

I just proved you wrong. ???
Seriously the only problem anyone might be having is understanding how you are viewing the world we live in.
The only problem people are having of viewing what I'm saying, is people like you.

24919
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:57:07 PM »
This is sad really. The earth is moving at what, 67,000 mph. The satellites is moving in the same direction at the same speed, and therefor they stay the same distance from each other, the only changes being in the satellite's orbit.
You should really understand the basics before ridiculing a subject, although I just hope you're a troll...
You will not get out of this one lightly.
I won't let this one lie. Expect diagrams.
You will find it difficult to refute what I'm going to say, yet I can bet my bottom dollar, you and others will come out with something stupid. ;D

24920
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:45:37 PM »
No but seriously we don't feel like going into heavy mathematics and physics/trajectories because it's a waste of our time when it's 'bullshit' by your standards.

*simple physics concept on earth*
Scepi: Oh yes this makes sense I can understand blah blah
*same exact concept in a vacuum(space)*
Scepi: Oh bullshit magic no work haha you guys fail shills bullshit magic!!

Scepi, it's totally fine to have a first impression of something from a logical standpoint, it's our nature.(Hmmmm the earth SEEMS flat... or ... hmmm that's really fast so I don't think that would work), but it's just that, a first impression or hypothesis.

This is where science comes in. Things are tested and tested and tested and tested until they're disproven. But until that happens they are taken as common knowledge. For example the flat earth model was beginning to be questioned around 2000 years ago, so many tests were conducted and guess what, they found a sphere model works much more logically. We're talking about some of the greatest minds in history who devoted their lives to science and astronomy, as opposed to some random guy on the internet with an obvious lack of knowledge in the basics...

By the time we reached outer space(which would be pretty sad if we couldn't do it since we're a pretty damn advanced species), there was no doubt because, well, right in their face was a giant sphere earth haha.

If none of us actually tested things using concrete evidence(math(doesn't change) and physics(almost never changes)), and went off of instinct like you do, we'd all probably still believe in a flat earth and be in the dark ages...
You can read me a story of Robinson Crusoe and Jumping Jack flash...but it's all stories.

You think we are an advanced species and can get into space...and yet, advertise a massive sale at a retailer... and this advanced species will kill each other or maim anyone who gets in their way, whilst the birds, chimps, lions and other docile animals play the game with each other and  share what they get.


Yes, we are advanced all right. In truth , we are as dumb as Friar TUCK.

24921
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:39:48 PM »
Looks like it's a hard one to answer boys. I'll be back later.

Inertia.

Where's my cookie?

And:

Where did I say that?

Momentum my arse, it's called "air flow."
Inertia my arse, If that's the case, you have to apply it to your 23,000 mile satellites that we supposedly rely on for out sat nav and sky television,
Must try harder.  ;D

24922
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:37:36 PM »
once again you lack of understanding of relative motion, potential energy, momentum, have all let you down so hard.  :(
I don't think so.
Once that rocket leaves earth, it goes into space,a s we are told.
Once in space, the earth and the moon, go whizzing off at 67,000 mph around the sun, leaving the rocket crying, wondering where it's mammy has gone and yet hasn't the power to catch up, because rockets cannot do 67,000 mph.

Have a good old think about it.
So when an object that is traveling the same speed as another object leaves it, it just automatically slams to a dead stop by some unseen force.  Is this what you're saying?
Quote
What are you talking about? a dead stop?,when did I mention that?

Since you're unable to even fathom something landing on a surface moving 10mph by matching that speed, I'm not surprised.
Quote
Forget the 10 mph, I'm on about the 67,000 mph.

Looks like it's a hard one to answer boys. I'll be back later.
Actually it's an easy one to answer.  It's still traveling along with the earth.  Looks like it's just a hard one for you to grasp.
Quote
How in the hell can it still be travelling along with the earth, when it's left earth and left "ORBIT"

Unless you're a troll.  You're not a troll are you Sceptimatic?  Be honest now. :-B
Quote
This about seals it. You can't discount it , so go to plan B which is attempted ridicule. Unfortunately for you, I don't bow down that easy, as you know.  ;D

24923
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:30:57 PM »
If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

Actually, it's even more complicated than that because the Apollo craft isn't traveling at a constant velocity.  The earth's gravitational field is tugging at the spacecraft, slowing it somewhat until it can reach a point where the moon's gravitational field becomes strong enough to start accelerating the craft towards the moon.
Sod the gravitational field, this has nothing to do with what I'm talking about and you know it.

24924
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:07:44 PM »
Looks like it's a hard one to answer boys. I'll be back later.

24925
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:07:08 PM »
once again you lack of understanding of relative motion, potential energy, momentum, have all let you down so hard.  :(
I don't think so.
Once that rocket leaves earth, it goes into space,a s we are told.
Once in space, the earth and the moon, go whizzing off at 67,000 mph around the sun, leaving the rocket crying, wondering where it's mammy has gone and yet hasn't the power to catch up, because rockets cannot do 67,000 mph.

Have a good old think about it.

like i said your complete lack of any kind of an education. face palm. lol
Still side stepping I see.  ;D

24926
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:05:32 PM »
I'm beginning to wonder if I'm going made here, as I've just had a thought.

Naturally we have to assume a rotating Earth model here, as we are told it is.
Ok so here goes.

If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

I'll have to do a drawing here to show what I mean.



because the apollo craft and any space craft is 1st and for most travaling at 67,000 mph with the earth and the moon. just like you me and the orange on my table. thats what relative speed means. now on top of this the iss travles at 17,000 mph to orbit the earth and the apollo craft travled at a further 24,791 mph to reach the moon. and no the apolo craft didnt go on a straight course to the moon it went more like this

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Just wait, he'll tell you that we're not moving at 67,000 mph because we should be able to feel it. Then he'll say that once we leave the Earth's atmosphere we shouldn't be travelling at the same speed, or that we'd crash land into the moon or something. So if you want to start on that rebuttal now, I'd take the opportunity.
Nice side step.

24927
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:02:03 PM »
once again you lack of understanding of relative motion, potential energy, momentum, have all let you down so hard.  :(
I don't think so.
Once that rocket leaves earth, it goes into space,a s we are told.
Once in space, the earth and the moon, go whizzing off at 67,000 mph around the sun, leaving the rocket crying, wondering where it's mammy has gone and yet hasn't the power to catch up, because rockets cannot do 67,000 mph.

Have a good old think about it.

24928
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 12:55:58 PM »
I'm beginning to wonder if I'm going made here, as I've just had a thought.

Naturally we have to assume a rotating Earth model here, as we are told it is.
Ok so here goes.

If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

I'll have to do a drawing here to show what I mean.



because the apollo craft and any space craft is 1st and for most travaling at 67,000 mph with the earth and the moon. just like you me and the orange on my table. thats what relative speed means. now on top of this the iss travles at 17,000 mph to orbit the earth and the apollo craft travled at a further 24,791 mph to reach the moon. and no the apolo craft didnt go on a straight course to the moon it went more like this

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Nope, it still doesn't solve the problem.

24929
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 12:36:53 PM »
they are not small bombs going off. ??? and u have yet to tell us whats wrong with the picture i posted. are you trying to avoid it?
make it bigger and you will see.

24930
Flat Earth General / Re: Moon Hoax, Not
« on: February 12, 2013, 12:35:43 PM »
I'm beginning to wonder if I'm going made here, as I've just had a thought.

Naturally we have to assume a rotating Earth model here, as we are told it is.
Ok so here goes.

If the Earth is rotating at 1040 mph at the equator and is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, then once this piece of shit Apollo craft leaves earth on a trajectory to the moon, how in the hell does it get back to earth when the earth has pissed off at 67,000 miles per hour, leaving the craft on it's way to the moon and also the moon is whizzing around the Earth at a few thousand mile per hour.

I'll have to do a drawing here to show what I mean.


Straugh= straight.

Pages: 1 ... 829 830 [831] 832 833 ... 852