1

The Lounge / Re: Greatest NHL goaltender of all time?

« on: September 07, 2013, 11:37:53 PM »

1. Brodeur
2. Roy
3. Luongo

2

Flat Earth General / Re: How did Antarctica's shape come about?

« on: April 15, 2013, 12:00:46 PM »

seeing that Antarctica has become a tourist attraction, no, it is not a 50 meter  uniform "ice wall".

You believe that Antarctica became a tourist attraction because the internet says so?

Seeing as how "the Internet" can put you in touch with many people who either have been there or can get you there, I'd say it's on you to prove it's not a tourist attraction since you seem to be the one in doubt.

One time I saw an interesting video about a supposed portal to another dimension located deep in the Andes of Peru. The natives call it the star gate of Aramu Muru, the video mentioned that there is a tour guide in America that can take you there for a fee, a phone number was provided to call to book a trip. I called the number and no one replied or called me back. and No it was not some youtube hoax, they had a legitimate website and there was a real voice mail when I called the number. The moral of the story it was bull shit, just like the trips to Antarctica, lol

So no dear friend its on you to prove me that such trips exist. Go ahead and book a trip come back and tell me where you went and what you saw, a stupid internet link is not a F"N prove. Just like the fake NASA pictures of earth. lol

ive been to antarctica with a team of 15 other microbiologists. i assure you the trips are not a hoax

3

Flat Earth General / Re: Is it photoshopped?

« on: February 02, 2013, 12:17:10 PM »

look at these fools blindly screaming photoshop, give your head a shake

i guarantee none of you can point out a single blemish in the picture

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: if satellites dont exist..

« on: January 30, 2013, 12:00:23 AM »

woah! this is the first ive heard of that, ill try finding more info on it but up until now all ive heard it FE denial of satellites. also i cant even trash talk the sharks at this point (even tho our 2nd line is injured)

5

Flat Earth Q&A / if satellites dont exist..

« on: January 29, 2013, 11:13:05 PM »

why am i able to see myself in my backyard from google earth?

6

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Three simple proofs that the earth is a SPHERE

« on: January 13, 2013, 09:59:50 PM »

FYI, its day and night in antarctica for 6 months at a time nots 24 hours

7

Flat Earth General / Re: A zetetic observation... of a round earth

« on: January 04, 2013, 08:15:38 PM »

so we have determined that the moon is lit by the sun

8

Flat Earth General / Re: Femto Photography

« on: December 22, 2012, 10:10:21 PM »

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,56539.msg1413191.html#msg1413191

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,56685.msg1419137.html#msg1419137


Also fun
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bending the light - physics experiment

the light only bends because of the curved plastic

9

Flat Earth General / Re: NASA want suggestions

« on: December 19, 2012, 11:23:34 PM »

so whats the deal with this?

10

Flat Earth Q&A / rotation of earth and flight

« on: December 17, 2012, 07:42:03 PM »

if the earth is not rotating then why are flight times shorter when traveling west? flying from vancouver to london is a longer flight than flying from london to vancouver (assuming there are no stops)

11

Flat Earth General / Re: NASA want suggestions

« on: December 15, 2012, 02:39:16 PM »

2nd in the hot section but theres gotta be more than 15 people wanted this, come on FE'ers!

12

Flat Earth General / Re: NASA want suggestions

« on: December 14, 2012, 03:30:07 PM »

here comes another + boys!

13

Flat Earth General / Re: Has anyone ever measured Earth's circumference?

« on: December 14, 2012, 03:25:36 PM »

The ISS does this every 90 minutes

No it doesn't.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Space Station Hoax : Air Bubbles Rise- Space Walks Simulated in A Massive Water Pool

videos can be easily faked, seems like you only believe videos that support your cause and dismiss the rest

14

Flat Earth General / Re: Mountainous NASA blunder

« on: December 13, 2012, 11:52:44 PM »

the world must be flat, this is undisputable evidence

Your reading comprehension is enviable.

no, the point was that this shouldn't have been posted to begin with.

people make mistakes, move on

15

Flat Earth General / Re: Has anyone ever measured Earth's circumference?

« on: December 13, 2012, 11:50:37 PM »

I'm not on about the Greek who looked down a well and saw the sun or shadows here and there.
I want to know if anyone has ever actually measured the Earth's circumference by normal means, whether it be a plane or whatever, where the actual starting point is dead centre back to the exact place.

Also, how does anyone know which is dead centre on the Earth to which they can take this measurement if there has ever been one?

Excellent question. I did some research, and you are right - no one has actually measured the "circumference" by direct means It's always by calculations removed by the third of fourth degree. Yes, I know what you're about to say - that's a tad suspicious.

why would one waste time and money measuring the circumference in a boat or plain when it can be done with simple mathematics

So that people who don't understand mathematics can be sure we know the size of the earth, obviously.

???not sure if youre being sarcastic, ill reply anyways
they should learn mathematics then lol

16

Flat Earth General / Re: Has anyone ever measured Earth's circumference?

« on: December 13, 2012, 10:08:42 PM »

I'm not on about the Greek who looked down a well and saw the sun or shadows here and there.
I want to know if anyone has ever actually measured the Earth's circumference by normal means, whether it be a plane or whatever, where the actual starting point is dead centre back to the exact place.

Also, how does anyone know which is dead centre on the Earth to which they can take this measurement if there has ever been one?

Excellent question. I did some research, and you are right - no one has actually measured the "circumference" by direct means It's always by calculations removed by the third of fourth degree. Yes, I know what you're about to say - that's a tad suspicious.

why would one waste time and money measuring the circumference in a boat or plain when it can be done with simple mathematics

17

Flat Earth General / Re: Mountainous NASA blunder

« on: December 13, 2012, 10:05:00 PM »

the world must be flat, this is undisputable evidence

18

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Acidents in space.

« on: December 13, 2012, 09:44:15 PM »

There is a clear correlation between FE'ers and high intelligence. There is also a clear correlation between high intelligence and high morality. Since RE'ers are generally less intelligent, they are generally going to have lower moral standards. Hence why this thread exists.

theres a clear correlation between FE'ers and ignorance.

19

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Acidents in space.

« on: December 13, 2012, 01:53:33 AM »

since were already discussing the deaths maybe we should discuss why NASA would put people in a fake rocket

20

Flat Earth General / Re: Mars Curiosity Self-portrait

« on: December 12, 2012, 07:06:16 PM »

an interesting video, but i highly doubt NASA landed on Mars, they did land somewhere, but I assume its terrestrial.
Mars is very small, no more than 1-2 km in diameter. Maybe the rover crash landed in an Earth desert and NASA is simply mistaken.

either way, thank you for sharing.

what place on earth would have no life or vegetation? also no outside disturbances such as aircraft
how do you know the size of mars?

We know Mars's appoxmate size because the moon passes in front of it.
Since they are only a few hundred miles apart, and the moon is 32 miles in diameter,
we can tell MArs is very small, 100s of times smaller than the moon.
Venus and Mercury are even smaller yet.

for starters, use either miles or KM's to describe sizes not both
second, you are again making bogus claims that mars is only a few hundred miles away from the moon, how did you come up with that number?

Try growing up in Canada someday and you'll know why not only using units of measurement but also languages are interchangeable.

The FAQ states the sun in 3100 miles above earth, the planets 3200 and the stars above. 
The only thing incorrect about this, and possibly due to the uneven weight of the earth, and the UA.
Sometimes Mercury and Venus come closer, because the transit the sun.

i am canadian, and we use KMs and miles when we talk but its not common to compare an object in miles with another in KMs
and just because its on the FAQ it doesn't make it true

21

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why

« on: December 12, 2012, 03:28:12 PM »

many people say the motive is money, but would cost more to fake a space program than to actually have one.

22

Flat Earth General / Re: Mars Curiosity Self-portrait

« on: December 12, 2012, 02:53:33 PM »

an interesting video, but i highly doubt NASA landed on Mars, they did land somewhere, but I assume its terrestrial.
Mars is very small, no more than 1-2 km in diameter. Maybe the rover crash landed in an Earth desert and NASA is simply mistaken.

either way, thank you for sharing.

what place on earth would have no life or vegetation? also no outside disturbances such as aircraft
how do you know the size of mars?

We know Mars's appoxmate size because the moon passes in front of it.
Since they are only a few hundred miles apart, and the moon is 32 miles in diameter,
we can tell MArs is very small, 100s of times smaller than the moon.
Venus and Mercury are even smaller yet.

for starters, use either miles or KM's to describe sizes not both
second, you are again making bogus claims that mars is only a few hundred miles away from the moon, how did you come up with that number?

23

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon phases and eclipse

« on: December 11, 2012, 11:14:46 PM »

I understand you have a "spotlight" explanation for the moon but what about moon phases?  How does this work with your spotlight?

And what about a lunar or solar eclipse?  How is this effect achieved with the spotlight? 

And while we are on the subject of the moon....how are ocean tides explained?

im a RE'er but these have been discussed many times
the moon lights itself up
and tides are caused by celestial gravitation from the moon
not sure about eclipses

24

Flat Earth General / Re: Mars Curiosity Self-portrait

« on: December 11, 2012, 11:10:16 PM »

an interesting video, but i highly doubt NASA landed on Mars, they did land somewhere, but I assume its terrestrial.
Mars is very small, no more than 1-2 km in diameter. Maybe the rover crash landed in an Earth desert and NASA is simply mistaken.

either way, thank you for sharing.

what place on earth would have no life or vegetation? also no outside disturbances such as aircraft
how do you know the size of mars?

25

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Curvature of the Earth

« on: December 11, 2012, 10:09:52 PM »

The curvature you saw was a combination of lens distortion and seeing the edge if the sun's spotlight (something we would expect to be curved).

The reason that the skydiver "fell" at 32 feet / second squared is because the earth was accelerating up towards the diver at 32 feet / second squared.

Lens distortion? But I saw this on the tv?

you are still looking through the camera in which it was filmed

26

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why vanishing points don't work that way [Math intensive]

« on: December 11, 2012, 02:47:16 PM »

Twang simply forgot to take mulitple variables into account. For example, the atmolayer is not 100% transparent. You can't see through air for long distances any more than you can see more than five meters in a thick fog. Eventually the light from the Sun ceases to reach you and from your observer standpoint, everything is dark.

Yes - it goes dark shortly after the sun has disappeared below the horizon.  Have you never noticed this phenomena ?

Do you have any evidence to support this outlandish claim?

other than everyone seeing it everyday with our own eyes?

27

Flat Earth General / Re: A genuine experiment - The ISS

« on: December 11, 2012, 02:29:32 PM »

http://www.isstracker.com/
i have observed the iss many times with this site
it is by no mean imaginary

28

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why vanishing points don't work that way [Math intensive]

« on: December 10, 2012, 11:46:39 PM »

Now, the internet tells us that the smallest object visible to the human eye is ~0.1 mm. So h(d,x)<.0002 m.
d/x < .0002
For argument's sake, let's make the object 2 meters tall (btw, why is distance x and height d? Doesn't vice versa make more sense?)

2/x < .0002
2 < .0002x
10,000 < x

So that's 10 km, which sounds about right for a perfectly clear day on a perfectly flat plane that isn't a body of water. In fact, wikipedia tells us that in the arctic one can see as far as 100 km on a good day, so 10 km seems a perfectly reasonable estimate.

See a person at 10km ?  That's good eyesight.  Wait until you're my age mate 

So at (ahem) 32miles in diameter (50km in modern measurements) should be visible at ~25,000,000 km.

But it disappears at night 

before this gets ignored, please explain FE'ers

29

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Square earth?

« on: December 10, 2012, 10:19:46 PM »

So? I'm not here to defend other versions of RET. Look at the name of the site.


I'm just pointing out that there are RE'ers who disagree with the scientfic consensus regarding the dimensions of the Earth.

and there are FE'ers who disagree with the scientfic consensus regarding the dimensions of the Earth.

30

Flat Earth Debate / Re: RET Destroyed: Objects do not fall at the same rate

« on: December 10, 2012, 12:03:40 AM »

the OP had many assumptions
they were thoroughly discussed in the first few pages, we dont need his results if we can mathematically see whats going to happen