Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Goth

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: climate change and the ice wall
« on: October 23, 2014, 08:03:16 AM »
The ice is theorized

Backed up by any evidence?


Are you claiming that Antarctica does not have solid land under most of the ice?

Not at all. As pointed out by other posters the fact that a large part of the Antarctic ice lies upon land is well known and verified by evidence.

What I'd really like to see is any evidence for the roumoured ice wall/rim wall.

Your insistance that it exists is just about as valid as my insistance that the unicorns migrated there to avoid joining Noah in his jaunt that little boat.


Sounds like we both agree that Antarctica exists.  What is in dispute is its shape.  I could just as well ask you for undeniable evidence that Antarctica is the shape that you say it is.  However, you would just give me NASA photos or something, which I would then question the validity of.  Do you see how this works?
Measured distances and travel times prove the shape of all parts of earth.  NASA is not the only organisation providing pictures of earth.

Most of the world had been mapped, charted , distances and travel times had been computed, et cetera, et cetera and so forth long before NASA. That also includes the size and shape of Antartica and no "Ice Wall"had ever been found.

Why does NASA always seem to be the "fall guy" for Flat Earthers ?
 :D ??? ::)

Because without an all powerful cabal controlling everyone everywhere, their entire delusion crumbles.

As far as their "entire delusion" is concerned if they really and truly believe in what they say, they are welcome to dwell in their own little dream world.  I just checked my profile. I have been on this website for over a year. I have come to the conclusion that they are never going to wake up out of their own little dream world that they have created . You do have to give them credit for their imagination.  LOL.

Can I use a mirror ,,  thank you ,, LOL

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A question about where to start the research
« on: October 23, 2014, 07:55:04 AM »
I would say, there is no real' darkness, but maybe real ignorance.


...{snip}The dumbest video on youtube.{/snip}...

The earth is not rotating spinning,Not My Vid,All Credit To Rory Cooper.. ;D

You do know what relative motion means, don't you?

Don't shoot the messenger,   and could it be that' The empty vessel makes the loudest sound.

Flat Earth General / Re: If Earth was a globe...
« on: October 22, 2014, 02:10:17 AM »
The earth is not a globe, the earth is infinite plane. The globe is matrix, its a 3D expression of our reality. Antarctica is only a continent in 3D, from higher dimension Antarctica serves as gateway or portal to infinite earth (Garden of Eden, Paradise, Jannah, Nirvana) same place, different names to describe it. We are basically locked in a very tiny real estate called the known world or the globe.  The government does have technology to open Antarctic gate and penetrate deep into infinite paradise that exists beyond the Antarctic. Nazis knew it, Americans knew it, Admiral Byrd knew it, U.N knows it. The UN Flag is what earth looks like from a higher 5 D reality, Beyond the Antarctic ring is vast glorious paradise earth. The illuminatti however want you to stay in this earth, locked in a cell of limited space.

Could it be that' it's like throwing your pearls before a swine,

Flat Earth Debate / Re: To the true believers
« on: October 08, 2014, 09:50:50 AM »
Anyway, getting back to your alternative Earth. How about putting it up as a topic and going in depth with it, seeing what you can add, rather than defending the globe model that is clearly given out as mis-info.

You expend far too much time and energy guarding this absolute heap of global Earth bull shit against people who you should, by now, know you are never going to change, especially with your attitude.
Spend a little less time whinging and whining and more time putting alternative theories out, like your theory above. You never know, it just might actually make you think differently about what you've been totally brainwashed into all your life.

I can see that I'm simply wasting my time trying to carry on any sort of mature discussion with you sceptimatic.  I've repeatedly attempted to debate you in a meaningful way, but your usual responses have usually been at the same intellectual level as those of an 8-year-old child giggling about 'poo' and 'wee' jokes behind the school bike shed.

So I'm afraid that after due consideration, I have to agree with the majority of other forum members here—even most of the flat earthers!—that you're nothing more than an intellectually-challenged mental cripple with a brain that'd fit in a thimble—and with space to spare.  I've never seen such a load of puerile, misinformed bullshit spew from anyone else's mouth as I've seen from yours.

You obviously don't know the first thing about physics, mechanics, aeronautics, jet propulsion, mathematics, astrophysics, kinetic and potential energy, mass and weight, velocity and acceleration, density and pressure, meteorology, man-made satellites, radio and TV transmission etc etc etc.

Your self-deception is a wonder to behold.  You accuse everybody else of being uneducated dolts who can barely tie their own shoelaces, whilst portraying yourself as some sort of scientific wunderkind.   To put it politely;  you're a wanker of the highest order.

Well done.   ;D

I'm so so' happy for you... give the dude a medal..

You think you know it all,  but could it be ,that in the end 'you don't know shit,,,

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Please explain satellite tracking
« on: October 08, 2014, 09:42:09 AM »
If the sun circles the flat Earth, then it would be at different angles at different times of day in different locations.
It's apparent size would also change quite significantly, so....

Atmospheric lensing could cause the sun to change apparent size as the amount of atmoplane changes between you and the sun.

But then so would everything else.  This does not happen. 

Have you never heard of a mirage?
No, I haven't.  Could you take me through it and explain the relevance?

What a surprise,,,

Flat Earth General / Re: Nasa admits Sun and Moon are Same Size
« on: October 08, 2014, 09:38:00 AM »
For someone that's as active as you on these forums, trolling and mocking the idea of Flat Earth, you'd think you would have at least read the Flat Earth Information Repository:
I have read it. There's also some sticky threads that say the moon is harmful to your health, which is something I've been testing for the past month or so (hint, nothing happens)

I was just arguing in a manner in which flatties are accustomed to. Stating my belief without actual substance or refutation. Then blaming it on some unsubstantiated conspiracy.
When all you people do is stomp your feet and assert something is as you think it is without anything to back up, your beliefs deserve to be mocked.

In your defense, iWitness, you've posted more of what can even remotely be considered proof.. even though it doesn't really prove your points.  I think Antonio's post illustrates that reasonably well.

But in the end you're wrong,,, funny isn't it,,,,

Flat Earth General / Re: Nasa admits Sun and Moon are Same Size
« on: October 08, 2014, 09:12:25 AM »
The sun and moon are not'' physical objects,,,   ::) ::) ::) ::) ;D

Could it be a' reflections of electromagnetic radiation.....


Google Earth Day...  ::) ::) ;D

Flat Earth Debate / Re: To the true believers
« on: October 01, 2014, 07:29:50 AM »
Brilliant as always,,,,  ;)

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Nothing Going on Here
« on: September 12, 2014, 07:27:38 AM »
accredited scientists ,,,, Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity.... why 'Could it be because its' Bullshit,,,

What has relativity got to do with whether the earth is round?

Stefan Marinov,,,René Descartes,,,,Nikola Tesla,,,, Albert A. Michelson,,,...

Could it be that' it has defined space and time for over a century
E= mc2  ' does this sound familiar,,,

(' Relativity is not only wrong, it’s an disgrace to common sense, and its creator, so could it be' that ,Albert Einstein, was no less than a 'Jweish Fcuk,,.

'The Einstein Bullshit' is intended for those who have been suspicious of the premise that reality is so subtle that it can only be understood in terms of sophisticated abstract mathematics to which only the elite were privy.

The understanding of reality in concrete terms was presented as being beyond the capability of intelligent individuals.

Instead, reality turns out to be readily understandable in terms of common sense reasoning once the smoke and mirrors of mathematical obfuscation and the mathematical and logical errors associated with Special and General Relativity have been removed."

'The speed of light relative to what?'

Flat Earth General / Re: Flat earth experiment to prove it curves nonsense
« on: September 08, 2014, 08:53:25 AM »
You mean Goth is a bullshit?

Could it be,, your mother and your sister,, are full of shit' maybe you love' to lick it 'out,,,,,

Flat Earth General / Lunar Eclipse, Bill Cooper, and the Flat Earth
« on: September 08, 2014, 08:51:43 AM »
" alt="" class="bbc_img" />

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Nothing Going on Here
« on: September 08, 2014, 06:33:37 AM »
aus you are pain. All of your questions have been answered previously in this forum. Please use some of your time searching rather than complaining. Thank you.

If you truly believe that "all" my questions have been answered, then you obviously haven't been following all the threads hoppy....

So here's a brief rerun for you to address now, and relieve my "pain"...

Name 6 accredited scientists who accept the flat earth theory.

Name 6 accredited scientists who've been exposed as deliberately lying about their belief in a round earth.

—I've asked other flat earthers these two critical questions, but thus far none have responded.  Can you?

accredited scientists ,,,, Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity.... why 'Could it be because its' Bullshit,,,

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Skylab 1979
« on: September 08, 2014, 06:20:52 AM »
So how did this shit fall to Earth.
If they were lying about the whole skylab orbiting, it is not much more trouble to throw some junk on the ground and say "skylab really was up there, see."

I congratulate you for being the first flat earther to satisfy my earlier criteria for being a naysayer hoppy.   :D

Well done mate.     10/10.

Re's, can't think for themselves, you have to point it out for them,, remember they are still a bunch of indoctrinated sheep's..

Flat Earth General / Re: Flat earth experiment to prove it curves nonsense
« on: September 08, 2014, 06:01:36 AM »
By science, do you mean bullshit?

Yeah,  I' mean bullshit

Flat Earth General / Amazing flight of a balloon to the edge of space
« on: September 07, 2014, 10:03:23 AM »
"DogCam flies to the edge of space 110,000ft on a balloon!"    Amazing not round tho,,,,

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Flat Earth General / Flat earth experiment to prove it curves nonsense
« on: September 07, 2014, 09:51:24 AM »
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Is there any REr who is buying this science?

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Is space travel theoretically impossible?
« on: September 05, 2014, 03:49:31 AM »
Launching a rocket, in to space ,,    Could it be that there is no,,  so called' outer-space,

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Vanishing Ship / telescope
« on: September 05, 2014, 03:33:16 AM »
how it can be that we can see a star that's millions of kilometres distant from the earth,

Which book please..

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Mountains casting shadows on clouds.
« on: September 05, 2014, 03:23:21 AM »

Explain this. This isn't possible on a round earth. Only on a flat earth,

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Good morning from me
« on: September 05, 2014, 03:09:46 AM »
The main issue with the notion that the sun is orbiting in a fixed circular path above the surface of the earth at all times is simply that were this the case, then it would never be totally dark anywhere on the earth's surface.  The light from the sun can travel an infinite distance, so even if it were (say) 50,000km distant, you'd still easily be able to see it from any point on a flat earth.

Exactly, and the FE'ers seem to have gone very quiet on this point. Are we supposed to disbelieve the evidence of our own eyes?

How can we trust when our perception is accurate and when it’s not?

Worryingly, we can’t.

Contrary to the evidence of our eyes, the squares labelled A and B are exactly the same shade of grey. That’s insane, right?

Obviously they’re a different shade. We know because we can clearly see they’re a different shade. Anyone claiming otherwise is an idiot.

Well, no. As this second illustration shows, the shades really are the same shade.

How can this be so?  We literally see something that isn’t there. This is a common phenomenon and Katherine Schultz -describes illusions as “a gateway drug to humility” ..

So, are we supposed to disbelieve the evidence of our own eyes?

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Is space travel theoretically impossible?
« on: September 02, 2014, 10:25:06 AM »
I don't think that space travel is out of out reach, but it will be very hard to outrun the movement of the earth.

Strangely enough, it's the "movement" of the earth that's used to help the launch of spacecraft. 

The scientific name for that " movement" is rotation.  And that's why rockets are always lunched in the same direction as the earth is rotating.  It's often mistakenly called the "slingshot effect" but that's really a misnomer.  It's more correctly termed "gravity" assist, but the flat earthers don't accept the theory of gravity itself, so I can see some... uh... issues with my explanation.

Maybe that's the reason why you will never do anything amazing with your life, you believe too much what you read, just like those bible followers...

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Why can't we see more of the moon?
« on: September 02, 2014, 10:10:58 AM »
Oh I see, now,, thank you so much, I  do appreciate

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8