1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: January 02, 2015, 03:30:44 AM »
Salt flats ( Bending oceans,,LOL
Now I am expecting Katara to be bending OCEANS
A Round ''Plaine,.. LMAO
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Salt flats ( Bending oceans,,LOL
Now I am expecting Katara to be bending OCEANS
A Round ''Plaine,.. LMAO
3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A question regarding time zones...
« on: December 04, 2014, 11:05:38 PM »
Something like this..
4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: What's the FE theory about space shuttle Columbia?
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:44:09 AM »
Photos taken of the Columbia explosion from an Israeli satellite[/b]
They were taken....obviously,just as the Shuttle began to explode over the Earth.
5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Coldest Temperature
« on: November 20, 2014, 07:11:41 AM »
No connection at all......
6
Flat Earth General / Re: Career shills are always here.
« on: November 20, 2014, 06:49:56 AM »That is there evidence the world is round. A bunch of shilly mcshillertons.I usually people start slinging "shill" accusations around when they have lost the debate.
I've no idea why this shit isn't being moderated.....oh, actually I have.
Yeah ,,, 
7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Gravity = Air Pressure
« on: November 18, 2014, 07:52:09 AM »It is something beyond gravity... Gravity by itself cannot explain how all the air still remains on the planet.Yes it can. Air has mass. The earth—like all other bodies—exerts an attractive force upon other bodies. Therefore the atmosphere, just like snails and cars and humans "stick" to the earth's surface.QuoteIt is an intelligent force is what I am saying... A conscious living force that allows air to stay on the planet... It is beyond just explanations of air pressure...Only one of your assertions is true. It is beyond the "explanation" of air pressure; it has nothing at all to do with air pressure—which operates equally in all directions on the human body.
There is no "intelligent" force in operation. Forces do not possess intelligence—that's the realm of living creatures (at the very least).
If you insist on crediting the effects of what science calls gravity on some "intelligent life force" can you please cite references that support this claim? Or, even better, define how you think that life force came into existence, what caused it, and why it operates as you claim it does?
Maybe it's time to go back to school
Professor Eric Verlinde, 48, a respected string theorist and a professor of physics at the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University of Amsterdam, proposed a new theory of gravity as reported by the New York Times on July 12, 2010. He argued in a paper, titled “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton” that gravity is a consequence of the laws of thermodynamics.
“For me, gravity doesn’t exist,” Dr. Verlinde told the Times. Of course, the apple will fall to the ground, but the physical laws governing that action may not be the way science has viewed it for the past 300 years.
8
Flat Earth General / America's first Space Station Skylab
« on: November 17, 2014, 07:48:58 AM »
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">America's first Space Station Skylab
Skylab was the United States' first space station,
and the second space station visited by a human crew.
Skylab was the United States' first space station,
and the second space station visited by a human crew.
9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Let's have a Mass Debate
« on: November 16, 2014, 04:37:56 PM »Ok guys,
The earth is Round, go on Google earth and it is. Search "earth" on Google and you get a circle.
If the earth was flat where would all the water go?
Where would the equator be?
What would be on the bottom? Could we go there?
The earth is round my fellow brothers.
Thank you so much I really appreciate it
10
Flat Earth General / Re: Simple Balloon "Rocket"...
« on: November 13, 2014, 07:30:28 AM »
Satans'' ugly boy ,,
11
Flat Earth General / Re: Simple Balloon "Rocket"...
« on: November 13, 2014, 07:03:14 AM »
Including even the flat earthers - are laughing at you behind your back.
No we don't,,
And pay no mind to those who laugh, behind your back, it simply means that you're two steps ahead.
No we don't,,
And pay no mind to those who laugh, behind your back, it simply means that you're two steps ahead.
12
Flat Earth General / NASA,' Engineers and technicians
« on: November 12, 2014, 07:21:39 AM »
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">F**K OFF NASA
No legacy is so rich as honesty.
No legacy is so rich as honesty.
13
Flat Earth General / Re: Have you ever seen the sunset from the ISS?
« on: November 12, 2014, 04:26:53 AM »
despite the clean technology of the past decade, we continue to extract and burn fossil fuels more than ever before
Boldness be my friend.
Boldness be my friend.
14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How thick can you be?
« on: November 12, 2014, 04:02:28 AM »
I am the Antichrist 2.... 
16
Flat Earth General / Re: Some questions to understand this better.
« on: November 12, 2014, 03:01:45 AM »
1] 'Could it be that, the so called Earth (gaia) is not a planet,
17
Flat Earth General / Re: Time since dinosaurs hugely inflated as well
« on: November 12, 2014, 02:56:29 AM »
18
Flat Earth General / Re: Have you ever seen the sunset from the ISS?
« on: November 12, 2014, 02:39:01 AM »By the way, your point is irrelevant as most people including professors don't even care if it is flat or not. They only care about their paychecks.I would challenge your assumption that most professors only care about their paychecks; they will care for their paychecks to the level you care for yours. Don't assume any moral superiority.The so-called science is based on memorization of 'known' facts. You memorize the concepts, you get ahead in your career. You challenge the status quo, you get fired and you don't have a job. Pretty easy conspiracy to maintain.
On the contrary: evolution challenged the status quo, relativity challenged the status quo, quantum mechanics challenged the status quo. Barry marshall challenged the status quo in medicine and received a Nobel prize for it.
Science is frequently challenged by scientists, that is how it progresses.
Could it be' despite the clean technology of the past decade, we continue to extract and burn fossil fuels more than ever before
19
Flat Earth Debate / Re: "Equator" problem
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:59:21 AM »
What's done can't be undone.
20
Flat Earth General / Spaceship Filmed Firing Thrusters In Front Of Moon
« on: November 10, 2014, 08:02:20 AM »
This clip shows what I believe to be a spaceship under intelligent control, in orbit and firing its thrusters/engines in front of the moon - and beyond. I have never seen footage like this and it may be a one of a kind capture. It is a UFO by definition and clearly under intelligent control.
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spaceship Filmed Firing Thrusters In Front Of Moon
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spaceship Filmed Firing Thrusters In Front Of Moon
21
Flat Earth General / Flat earth and the event horizon
« on: November 10, 2014, 07:24:30 AM »
Flat earth and the event horizon - YouTube
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Flat earth and the event horizon
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Flat earth and the event horizon
22
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites and the Internet ?
« on: November 10, 2014, 06:51:20 AM »But the fact remains that all of the "satellite" technologies out there could be delivered by ground stations.Nope. This is demonstrably wrong. The GPS requires line of sight to four satellites as a fundamental principle of its operation, as per this diagram:
Obviously ground-based transmitters would be unable to perform the necessary positioning triangulation.
He's wrong. Again
By ,LocataLite Locata
Ground-Based Version of Satellite GPS Could Make Positioning Technology Accurate to Inches Anywhere
GPS is currently accurate to something like 9 feet. An Australian company says its new geolocation technology could shave that down to a few centimeters, if its hardware is rolled out across the world. The company, Locata, envisions a constellation of local "satellites"--known as "LocataLites"--installed in known locations across an area that allow devices to get a super-accurate fix on their locations.
Locata's vision works more or less just like the existing GPS system, except that the transmitters are ground-based rather than orbiting
23
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites and the Internet ?
« on: November 09, 2014, 07:13:57 AM »How can you receive TV in the middle of the desert or ocean?The thread is discussing high bandwidth data transmission (not TV or radio) - this is impossible via "Skywave".
Via; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkywaveQuote
Could it be, that'' FM is a mode and HF is a band as I'm sure you know. Did you mean the FM broadcast band? If so I'm sure you know about hybrid digital and the various other subcarrier techniques that have been used to deliver various services "invisibly and underneath" ordinary FM broadcast. I'm sure you know about the various spread spectrum technologies that are now in service.
Nobody here is trying to force you to believe anything.
But the fact remains that all of the "satellite" technologies out there could be delivered by ground stations. Much work has been done with GHz band radio and the ionosphere and it is now certain that the ' ionosphere and the magnetosphere,''do indeed reflect these ultra-short bands to some degree.
24
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites and the Internet ?
« on: November 07, 2014, 04:20:11 AM »
How can you receive TV in the middle of the desert or ocean?
Via; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave
And, as for GPS functions, there are known ground based positioning technologies such as Locata and Pseudolite which are more accurate than "GPS" and use no "satellites."
I mention these only to illustrate that satellites are not needed for global positioning -- all you need is a network of surface transmitters in known positions.
Which method do you suppose is cheaper and easier: launching satellites into space or positioning transmitters on the ground or sea?
Via; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave
And, as for GPS functions, there are known ground based positioning technologies such as Locata and Pseudolite which are more accurate than "GPS" and use no "satellites."
I mention these only to illustrate that satellites are not needed for global positioning -- all you need is a network of surface transmitters in known positions.
Which method do you suppose is cheaper and easier: launching satellites into space or positioning transmitters on the ground or sea?
25
Flat Earth General / Re: Sir Richard Branson admits Space Tourism Project in doubt
« on: November 06, 2014, 08:27:19 AM »
How did the pilot survive? There is no ejection seat. How did he jump out of the plane at 50000ft?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2820138/50-000-feet-high-no-oxygen-travelling-speed-sound-did-pilot-survive-Virgin-Galactic-crash-injured-shoulder.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
"Investigators are trying to piece together how SpaceShipTwo's surviving pilot managed to escape the rocket as it disintegrated around him and parachute to the ground from an altitude virtually devoid of oxygen.
Pete Siebold, 43, sustained just an injured shoulder when the Virgin Galactic spacecraft broke apart mid-flight and crashed in the Mojave desert last Friday, killing co-pilot Michael Alsbury, 39.
Christopher Hart, acting chairman for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) that is leading the crash investigation, said Mr Siebold did not exit through the cockpit's escape hatch.
'We know it wasn't through there, so how did this pilot get out?' he said."
How did the pilot survive? There is no ejection seat. How did he jump out of the plane at 50000ft?
Hmm... let me guess... perhaps he's a liar - and never flew the plane in the first place?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2820138/50-000-feet-high-no-oxygen-travelling-speed-sound-did-pilot-survive-Virgin-Galactic-crash-injured-shoulder.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
"Investigators are trying to piece together how SpaceShipTwo's surviving pilot managed to escape the rocket as it disintegrated around him and parachute to the ground from an altitude virtually devoid of oxygen.
Pete Siebold, 43, sustained just an injured shoulder when the Virgin Galactic spacecraft broke apart mid-flight and crashed in the Mojave desert last Friday, killing co-pilot Michael Alsbury, 39.
Christopher Hart, acting chairman for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) that is leading the crash investigation, said Mr Siebold did not exit through the cockpit's escape hatch.
'We know it wasn't through there, so how did this pilot get out?' he said."
How did the pilot survive? There is no ejection seat. How did he jump out of the plane at 50000ft?
Hmm... let me guess... perhaps he's a liar - and never flew the plane in the first place?
26
Flat Earth General / Re: Green screen disinfo.
« on: November 05, 2014, 05:55:03 AM »
Unbelieva-bull- bull shit!!!!
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anderson Cooper GreenScreen Studio Bomb Studio Echo
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anderson Cooper GreenScreen Studio Bomb Studio Echo
27
Flat Earth General / Re: Sir Richard Branson admits Space Tourism Project in doubt
« on: November 04, 2014, 10:21:28 AM »
28
Flat Earth General / Re: Sir Richard Branson admits Space Tourism Project in doubt
« on: November 02, 2014, 09:45:54 AM »Gosh. Just when we were about to begin the age of space tourism by private companies like Branson's Virgin Galactic – wouldn't you know it? – one of their “spaceplanes” crashed!
And, coincidentally, in the same week as another big rocket disaster to boot!
Looks as fake as a model airplane on fake ground. What's with that area of duplicate ground?
29
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites and the Internet ?
« on: October 29, 2014, 07:44:31 AM »
When you listen to your radio, use a mobile phone or watch TV, you are using a device that receives radio waves.
Radio waves are a form of electromagnetic radiation, just like the visible light you see with your eyes.
The difference is that radio waves have a longer wavelength and are lower in frequency than visible light.
They also very wimpy - they have far less energy. Any electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength bigger than 1mm is considered a radio wave. ] Credit: NASA
WW2... Side view of a radioman carrying the SCR-300 radio set with the AN-130-A antenna. He wears the HS-30 headset under his helmet and the TS-15 handset
The satellite story we use, is just so' we can have a good laugh....
Radio waves are a form of electromagnetic radiation, just like the visible light you see with your eyes.
The difference is that radio waves have a longer wavelength and are lower in frequency than visible light.
They also very wimpy - they have far less energy. Any electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength bigger than 1mm is considered a radio wave. ] Credit: NASA
WW2... Side view of a radioman carrying the SCR-300 radio set with the AN-130-A antenna. He wears the HS-30 headset under his helmet and the TS-15 handset
The satellite story we use, is just so' we can have a good laugh....
30
Flat Earth General / Re: Satellites and the Internet ?
« on: October 27, 2014, 06:03:09 AM »
#t=87" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">#t=87
Why can't we see those city night lights on the (supposed) live stream? there's nothing but black when it's on the night side of earth.
Why can't we see those city night lights on the (supposed) live stream? there's nothing but black when it's on the night side of earth.