1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Theories and laws
« on: April 11, 2012, 04:04:49 PM »
Although it is kind of nice when people know what they are talking about. I.E Gravity is not a law, even for REer's it is a theroy.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Theories and laws
« on: April 09, 2012, 04:45:04 PM »
If you would actually read my post you would see that I know the difference between the two. I was trying to see if others knew, or if they did not they would now know the difference and be better at debates.
3
Flat Earth Debate / Theories and laws
« on: April 09, 2012, 03:57:41 PM »
Does anybody know the difference between a theroy and a law. Please post your anwers below, and if you are wondering I do know I am just wondering if anybody elese knows and to teach others so they can be more effective in debates.
4
Flat Earth General / Re: Let's talk about Space Legos
« on: March 05, 2012, 06:56:07 PM »Did you just call me an FE Zelot[sic]?
I demand satisfaction! Mods, kill it with fire! before it can make moar posts!
fix'd
5
Suggestions & Concerns / How do you prove that a user is an alt?
« on: March 05, 2012, 04:36:48 PM »
What if you are wrong?
6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Just one quick question
« on: February 27, 2012, 06:30:51 PM »
The FET sun is too small to produce the amounts of energy needed for nuclear fusion.
7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Just one quick question
« on: February 27, 2012, 06:18:00 PM »Anybody?Well, as a REer, I've seen two answers here.
One, usually from Tom Bishop, is that we don't know and can't know until someone travels to the Sun. (Easily dismissed with nuclear and quantum sciences, and Spectroscopy.)
Two, that the Sun is composed a theoretical quark-gluon state. (Easily dismissed by the absence of very high energy particle for its decay.)
Does any of that explain how the elements are made? Probably not
9
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What does the flat earth society think about aliens?
« on: February 26, 2012, 10:23:37 AM »
Theoretical probability of life on other planets--High
experimantal probability of life on other planets--Low
experimantal probability of life on other planets--Low
10
Flat Earth Q&A / Just one quick question
« on: February 26, 2012, 09:58:06 AM »
In RET the sun runs on nuclear fusion, taking simple elements such as Hydrogen an turning them into more complex elements like Oxygen, Helium, Nitrogen, Carbon, ect. This requires massive amounts of energy and heat. In RET our sun is much larger than the earth, so it can generate the energy to create the basic elements for life. In FET the sun is much too small to small to provide the energy to power nuclear fusion. My question is how are the elements of the periodic table created? Does the smaller sun still do it, but nuclear fusion require less energy than what was origionally thought? Sorry if this was not your idea of quick.
11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Shape of the earth?
« on: February 23, 2012, 06:54:46 PM »The earth is a hexagonal prism, I was not able to vote.
Fixed.
12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Shape of the earth?
« on: February 23, 2012, 06:40:20 PM »
This is just asking for everyones opinions, glad that you voted.
13
Flat Earth Q&A / Shape of the earth?
« on: February 23, 2012, 06:36:47 PM »
I think that the earth is in a superposition of every shape at once.
14
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Parallactic Angle
« on: February 23, 2012, 06:29:33 PM »The only thing I see in the first post is an illustration and a blind assumption that RET is true.
Causeless has at least provided evidence to support his contentions.
FE - 1
RE - 0
The only thing I am getting from this post, is that the accusation that a blind assumption of a certainfacttheory being true automatically resolves to being in favour of any conflictingliestheories.
Therefore, based on Mr. Bishop's flawed logic, all FET theories support RET and all RET theories support FET.
Someone give this man a medal
15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Let's talk about UA, and parachutes
« on: February 20, 2012, 02:23:01 PM »I understand it's a lot of work, but please try and read all of the FAQ before posting. Or, alternatively, look up the Equivalence principle.
Why dont you update the FAQ then?
16
Arts & Entertainment / Re: DETROIT TIGERS SIGN PRINCE FIELDER TO A 214 MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT
« on: February 16, 2012, 02:20:27 PM »
I was talking about Delmon, the Twins traded him for no apparent reason just before a home game with the Tigers.
I think they needed to replace V-Mart's bat in the lineup, and they saw that Prince was thinking about leaving the Brew Crew so the jumped on him with an offer and he took it. Besides Inge's bat is not strong enough to be a full time starter.
I think they needed to replace V-Mart's bat in the lineup, and they saw that Prince was thinking about leaving the Brew Crew so the jumped on him with an offer and he took it. Besides Inge's bat is not strong enough to be a full time starter.
17
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Is Pokemon Dead?
« on: February 15, 2012, 07:20:11 PM »
Pokemon always seems to die after the 3rd game in the generation, but then releases a new game in a year or 2 making it cool again but then it dies out again only to repeat the cycle.
18
Arts & Entertainment / Is Pokemon Dead?
« on: February 15, 2012, 07:08:57 PM »
so guys what do you think. Is it dead after this gen or will it rise from the ashes like a phoenix once again.
19
Arts & Entertainment / Re: DETROIT TIGERS SIGN PRINCE FIELDER TO A 214 MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT
« on: February 15, 2012, 03:15:12 PM »
Miggy and Inge will probably trade off 3rd base, and Miggy will play DH while not on 3rd switching off with Young (why did we ever give him away?)
To sum it up Detriot needed a 1st baseman more than they needed a 3rd.
To sum it up Detriot needed a 1st baseman more than they needed a 3rd.
20
Arts & Entertainment / Re: DETROIT TIGERS SIGN PRINCE FIELDER TO A 214 MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT
« on: February 14, 2012, 07:18:07 PM »
There go the chances of the Twins ever having a shot at the AL Central title for 9 years....If they ever had one.
BTW The tigers needed a 1st baseman or DH.
BTW The tigers needed a 1st baseman or DH.
21
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Ok nerds, Kingdom of Amalur.
« on: February 14, 2012, 07:13:30 PM »
Game is great, camera angle is like that of WoW and Fable, combat like that of the recent Batman games, and graphics are very colorful and much like that of WoW.
Curt Schilling is a great game designer, and a great baseball player.
Curt Schilling is a great game designer, and a great baseball player.
22
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Nickelback
« on: February 14, 2012, 07:09:06 PM »
Metallica!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...........anyone?
Fall Out Boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..........anyone?
Fall Out Boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..........anyone?
23
Flat Earth Debate / Re: "Looks flat to me" - a valid argument?
« on: February 14, 2012, 06:56:49 PM »
my point exactly ClockTower
24
Flat Earth Debate / Re: "Looks flat to me" - a valid argument?
« on: February 14, 2012, 06:03:18 PM »
I would like to "dumb down" (no harm intended) what the OP is trying to say
A very large sphere from close up looks flat.
Therefore by saying that the earth looks flat does not count as a valid argument.
A very large sphere from close up looks flat.
Therefore by saying that the earth looks flat does not count as a valid argument.
25
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Gears of War 3
« on: January 29, 2012, 12:13:44 PM »
I personally thought that the campaign was very good the cutscenes played like a good movie. I thought the playable parts were also good, they added just enough rail shooting to break up the monotony of "duck and cover" the one thing I dont like about the game is the unlockable gun skins and characters, not many can be unlocked through gameplay. I give it 9/10
26
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Spooky stuff
« on: November 15, 2011, 06:36:50 PM »
So you can say that the earth is in a superposition of beeing every shape at once.
27
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: A Few Questions From a Newbie
« on: November 15, 2011, 05:49:50 PM »
I can answer #1 for you, they will say it's a conspiracy
28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Just to clear things up
« on: November 15, 2011, 05:47:19 PM »Just to clear things up gravity is not something pushing or pulling on anything. Gravity is the attraction between objects that have mass or energy. That is allAaauuugh!! Your...your picture!
IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!
No its not it's true, but lets try to stay on topic please
29
Flat Earth General / Re: There are no real believers.
« on: November 15, 2011, 05:45:26 PM »Actually, most scientists back then were expected to tie religion into their work, particularly if it was of great philosophical importance. Newton used his work in an attempt to justify the existence of God. Copernicus spoke of God in his works and claimed that his work was in agreement with the bible. Galileo taught at a religious college and incorporated religion into his teachings.
They were also persiquted as criminals for crimes against god. Because of this they formed the illuminati.
I do agree agree with your facts I am just adding more to the story.
30
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Tides?
« on: November 14, 2011, 06:12:54 PM »
Read ENaG it will tell you a theroy. BTW I already have a thread on this topic could someone please link to my post please.