1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Religion poisons everything
« on: April 18, 2013, 08:22:36 AM »
Thanks for your responses. I felt like I was talking to morons on Ray Comforts Facebook page, and needed a gentle reminder
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I agree with LordDave. It's people that poison things, not religion. Religion is simply a means to an end.
I am fairly certain Taoism has never hurt anyone nor does it teach that anyone is special or that you will get some sort of mysterious afterlife goodies.
for which I am prepared to defend, and provide evidenceYou should have done that in the OP. That's why this is a shit thread. There is nothing to examine or debate.
Although now that I think about it, I wonder what buddism poisoned....
False.
People poison everything. Religion is fine so long as people don't run it.
I would expect a legitimate space agency to show me accurate pictures of the earth, not inaccurate pictures taken with fish-eye lenses.their is lots of photos out their with no fish eye distortion. you just seam to have a bias for posting only fish eye photos. that's your own fault.
I would expect a legitimate space agency to show me accurate pictures of the earth, not inaccurate pictures taken with fish-eye lenses.
What do you mean "If" I invented time travelOh noes, Theodolite is a time-traveling NASA agent trying to prevent the Great Reveal of the Ultimate Truth of 2044.
All you have to do is decide you want to build a time machine. If you succeed you will get instant results. I will tell you one thing, those pyramids are a mofo to build.
Didn't succeed.
What do you mean "If" I invented time travel
Guess he's currently working on it.
Well you have an address Markjo and logicalskeptic. If you have all the answers, write him and tell him. It would be interesting to see if any of you can claim the money.Wow... if that's still his address he lives about 20 minutes from me.Religious fanatics still have money that is as fun to spend as anyone elses.
He lost me once he mentioned scripture. You can't prove anything to a religious fanatic.
That is true, in fact there are no examples that I can think of where the human eye is the best tool to determine anything.This is its relevance. You said nonsense. Its the best tool for identifying known objects or unknown objects in your field of view.
GPS tracking.A GPS would be entirely as successful at describing your path on any map of the Earth. Case in point: Mercator is commonly used in GPS.
The human eye is clearly the best tool for identifying almost everything in everyday experience.
The existence of a network of pseudolites consistent enough to replace satellites is definitely not proven. Even on this forum the evidence shown is nearing zero.
No one on this forum has presented evidence that satellites are broadcasting the signals. The evidence shown on this forum is nearing zero.
I have posted evidence from multi station gps tracking surveys that I have conducted that conclude the satellites altitude and speed are correct.
Source? GPS signals don't send out altitudes.
But no cartographer can agree with you.Most can, in fact. All maps in existence are projections.Maps exist and coexist in many different scales. Apparently, this notion is alien to you.Yes, including variable scales. Have you looked up what a Mercator projection is yet, or have I been wasting time mentioning it ever so often?
The existence of a network of pseudolites consistent enough to replace satellites is definitely not proven. Even on this forum the evidence shown is nearing zero.
No one on this forum has presented evidence that satellites are broadcasting the signals. The evidence shown on this forum is nearing zero.
Stop trolling. The fact that there are so many "satellite" televisions in the world demonstrate that there are lots of pseudolites and/or stratellites.So little information about pseudolites. Do they even exist?
There isnt a lot of info as there isnt a lot of use for them, or many in existence.
So little information about pseudolites. Do they even exist?
I don't see the reason why you want to use anything more complicated than this.It's not complicated at all. You're just dismissing it without even trying to think about it. It's like with people who say maths is hard because they don't pay attention in class.
Fortunately, I never had teachers like you.
Using the simples laws of geometry (and why should it be different because we are dealing with flat surfaces), we know that any distance in square F12 = the ones in V5.Of course, including a variable scale, such as that of the Mercator map or the FE map.
This is valid using any scale.
Can someone explain this guy that we don't need a variable scale?
FE = flat map = euclidean geometryIncorrect.
Can someone prove of disprove that guy?
Just imagine you take a photo of FE, from space.
Then you draw a map directly from the photo.
There you have your FE map.
I'd just like to see what it looks like.
It doesn't work for you so Theodolite is trolling?No. Like I said, I suspected that he was trolling. Now that others have confirmed that this picture is an illusion, I understand his point, even though I can't see it myself. Nonetheless, it's interesting that you would try to misinterpret my words like this.Try the link, there is another illusion there.Hmm, that kind of works, yeah.And I'm not trolling, I provided significant evidence that zetecism is flawed due to the human eye being unreliable.Oh, I absolutely agree. What we see with our eyes can serve as evidence, but not proof.Also, no one has answered my question about putting stakes in lineDepends on what kind of precision you're expecting. I could probably make a good try, but it's likely to be imperfect.