Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
when i told my teacher that the earth is flat and gave her facts, she called me stupid and dumb. how can i explain to my math teacher that the earth is not round and to open her eyes!
Vacuum has power. But has the power of zero. Ahahah. Power / zero = infinitive. It has power, it has infinitive power but negative. Destroys everything.
How would you like me to prove it?
You can't do that. Because you don't know how you can prove something. So why do you here?
Prove it. Where is proof? No proof. No, any proof. You're nothing but just a cute liar.
The effect of nothing being inside the tanker is obvious to most, except you.
I'm not going to watch that video without more information first. Could you summarize it?
Even if this was case, friction free environments exist if you believe in outer space...
Analogy fail!
I think it is NASA acknowledging the reality of the Earth.
That it is flat and non-rotating.
My premise is this. Earth is flat and space is curved. The flat dimensions of the Earth are curved by space back onto themselves in an endless loop. This 'curviness' of space is determined by the earths mass. There need be no contradiction.
Please take part in my poll.
I'm not riled up, I made one post about the curvature in it being minimal and hardly a reliable bit of evidence when there's as much potential error as there is when that many clouds etc are involved, and a one-pixel line can make it impossible to notice. Just, as ever, it gets blown out of all proportion by a select few round earthers who think even the bad arguments are sacrosanct.
He's saying the surface area doesn't add up.
Would the physical appearance of "A" be same for both "B" and "C" or different?
Note how the bot first emphasises that there ARE real people here, then goes on to imply this forum is too insignificant to have bots, before finishing by claiming that there are no bots here, implying I am mentally ill for saying so.
And of course it ignores the parts of my post about corruption, criminal conspiracy etc, because it is programmed to avoid those subjects.
Classic bot shitpost.
I know how to spot you, so give it up.
The reputation I have on here that I do not have IRL, even when I speak about the same subjects?
Yeah, that's just more evidence that bots run this place.
Because IRL people completely understand the concepts of criminal conspiracy, boondoggles and government corruption:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boondoggle
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruption
Even Wikipedia acknowledges them ffs...
Yet in this madhouse none of those things exist.
Why?
Bots.
Not shills...
Bots.
This place is an automated lying machine, nothing more.
Replicating an infinite hard vacuum in a skinny plexiglass tube?
Sounds legit!
And no free body diagram of an object surrounded by nothing, as usual...
Another sockbot goes on ignore.
IMPOV - In My Point Of View
Would the physical appearance of "A" be same for both "B" and "C" or different?
Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A will be same for both B and C – IMPOV - so what is your opinion?.
QuotePerson A, B and C are three distinct people, they don't have the same physical appearance nor will they age the same
Person A would age 60 years and look 60 years older, person B would age ~50ish years and look 50ish years older, person C would age ~25 years and look 25 years older
Would "A" aged 60 years and look 60 years older relative to himself and "B" and "C" as well?
QuoteA would look oldest, b would look a little younger and c would look a lot younger
Does it address to what I said
Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A will be same for both B and C – IMPOV - so what is your opinion?. Similarly,
Wasn't the airplane (in which an atomic clock was sent for time dilation purpose) in acceleration mode when flying parallel to the curvature of the earth?
QuoteStanding on a sidewalk @ 1g is different than accelerating @ 1g?
Both B and C can use a separate rail car for their journey on a very big asteroid. A stays at home while B and C set out with high speed (say 0.5c and 0.9c) in their respective rail cars at the same time in the same direction relative to A. They attain their respective speed right after their departure. Assume each 10 years old at the time of departure. After 3o years relative to A, both B and C turn around and gain their respective speed in the same manner after taking a very short stop/ break (say 1 hr). Afterwards, B and C return home at the same time and reunited with A.
Since A has only one physical appearance, therefore, physical appearance of A will be same for both B and C – IMPOV
Wasn't the airplane (in which an atomic clock was sent for time dilation purpose) in acceleration mode when flying parallel to the curvature of the earth?
Qantas with lie of: Sydney to Santiago flights. Johannesburg to Perth flights. (flight time)
I have taken this flight, the flight time was accurate, the flight is real
As to why there is variance in flight times for different airlines, not all airlines fly the same routes, some fly into jet streams to speed up the plane, others fly to minimise fuel use to save money, and depending on weather that can also drastically affect the flight time.
A planes maximum cruise speed is not its maximum ground speed, 899km/h in the air with a 100km/h tail wind is about 999 km/h ground speed
I don't believe you. Prove you taken this flight.
But since it is and, as far as we know now, can be nothing but a "thought experiment" who knows?
