Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ezkerraldean

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11
31
Technology, Science & Alt Science / What are your opinions on Evolution
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:55:51 AM »
Evolution is obviously false, monkeys dont give birth to people and loads of monkeys are still around. God created the world 60 years ago and crafted Adam and Eve from a dollop of his own shit.

32
Flat Earth Q&A / Gravity, Static and Polarity
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:52:00 AM »
Quote from: "CharlesJohnson"
Quote from: "Ezkerraldean"
F = GMm / r^2

(where masses act grom the relevant centres of gravity)
a formula that sctually does work, with G precisely calculated, in FE or RE. since everyone stands perpendicularly against the ground, using this formula you can assume the earth is spherical around the centre of gravity. If we were on a FE, the centre of gravity for the earth would be exclusively beneath the north pole, and everyone would be walking at a funny angle.


I think G is only accurate to 3 significant figures. (I may be wrong) Thats
pretty bad compared to most constants, but its good enough for me.


you mean g. G and g are different.

33
The Lounge / Best City
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:45:52 AM »
Novgorod. it's where the Conspiracy operated from.

34
Flat Earth Q&A / Gravity, Static and Polarity
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:41:50 AM »
F = GMm / r^2

(where masses act grom the relevant centres of gravity)
a formula that sctually does work, with G precisely calculated, in FE or RE. since everyone stands perpendicularly against the ground, using this formula you can assume the earth is spherical around the centre of gravity. If we were on a FE, the centre of gravity for the earth would be exclusively beneath the north pole, and everyone would be walking at a funny angle.

35
The Lounge / World War II
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:34:51 AM »
Spain. 1939

36
Flat Earth Q&A / NASA Questions
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:32:25 AM »
what about the iranians? they launch their own satellites and their program is closely linked to the military. there must be some sort of link between iran and the rest of the world by which to co-ordinate the Global Conspiracy. so the whole iran/US standoff is a cover-up too?

37
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Microwave Background
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:29:45 AM »
Quote from: "Xanthanov"
I am sorry, sir, but you are incorrect. The microwave background does encompass all wavelengths; there is a distribution of intensity as a function of wavelength. It PEAKS at frequencies termed microwave. Thus, it is called the microwave background. It is a black body spectrum corresponding to a very low temperature (~2 K). So, while the intensity tapers off sharply at higher or lower frequencies, they are part of the spectrum. Try googling cosmic background spectrum, and find a pretty graph.


and how much charge would you need to hold up the sun and moon? the charge liberated by 1% of the CMBR which is itself pathetically weak?

38
Flat Earth Q&A / NASA Questions
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:21:45 AM »
why it is only ever NASA? why not Roskosmos, ESA and the countless private rocket launching companies?

39
The Lounge / World War II
« on: January 24, 2007, 06:19:04 AM »
conspiracy. WWII never happened. your grandad might show you photos, but you cant say for sure they are real can you?

40
The Lounge / A little reminder for when you drive into central London
« on: January 23, 2007, 08:38:36 AM »
The Congestion Charge operates Monday to Friday, 7.00am - 6.30pm.
To pay, call
0845 900 1234
or visit www.cclondon.com

41
Flat Earth Q&A / flight times
« on: January 23, 2007, 08:23:48 AM »
Quote from: "Masterchief2219"
Quote from: "Ezkerraldean"
...this can be seen as an admission that they don't actually know...

Or you can see it for what it really is. They are ignoring you because you are a troll.


i never used to be. i came here first actually wanting to find some stuff out, se why people think this sort of stuff. then when it became clear that they just ignore everything scientific you post then i just got bored and started trolling/spamming. they ignored me before that.

42
The Lounge / yeah
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:42:44 AM »
please can you say why you accept FE but reject this? i seriously want to know. i just spam it because i NEVER get an answer.








whoops, wrong letter. now read it.

43
The Lounge / Cool test
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:40:28 AM »
well it says i'm cool.

44
Flat Earth Q&A / Rowbotham Agent of Globularist Conspiracy
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:35:52 AM »
i wish to post in this thread to stop it flashing orange

45
Flat Earth Q&A / lunar eclipses
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:30:13 AM »
so, has a FE response emerged yet?

how do lunar eclipses occur in FE?
convention is that the moon is obscured by the shadow of the earth. this is why the edge of the shadow is round and blurred (earth atmosphere refraction). this cannot occur in FE since the moon would have to be both "above" the earth-disc to be visible, and at the same time below it to be obscured by its shadow - since the sun is always above the disc.

46
The Lounge / yeah
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:21:08 AM »
haha. i LOVE the way they just ignore these and lock them because they are "offensive". they cannot give a good reason why this is wrong and FE is right. fools.


Quote from: "obcrock"

There is a reason, we just dont know, see my FAQ

Q:What is the motivation for this conspiracy

A:there could be many reason, money, power, embaresment, but we are sure the conspiracy exists because it is the only logical answer

it is a conspiracy. it is not real. but we dont know why there is a conspiracy.
you see, same logic both ways. FE and tumours.

47
Quote from: "Rogherio"
In order for this to workI have to take into account a piece of Round earth science; behind all background radiation is that of the big bang.  This I propose is coming from the UA beneath us. This radiation is all of the wavelengths of the EMS but of course only the correct wavelengths have the right frequencies to take part in the photo-electric effect.  



cosmic background radiation is not "all of the wavelengths". sorry. it is microwave (~2mm wavelength according to COBE, a sattellite that according to you probably doesnt exist). you need at least UV to liberate electrons. background radiation can't ionise phuque all.

48
Flat Earth Q&A / flight times
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:08:33 AM »
i've brought up things like this before and they never answer. this can be seen as an admission that they don't actually know and that their model cannot explain it. they refuse to comment in any way to try and save face by making it seem like they just haven't come across the thread yet. with that done, they go downstairs and grope some chained-up abducted 4-year-old boys.

49
The Lounge / Save Nazanin from unjust, theocratic death sentence!
« on: January 23, 2007, 07:00:19 AM »
death penalty sucks
iranian government sucks
american government sucks


apparently (amnesty international said once) the two countries with the worst record for executing young people are iran and USA

50
The Lounge / yeah
« on: January 23, 2007, 03:17:18 AM »
"cancer" does not exist. it is a conspiracy.

the government will infect people it doesnt like with a "cancer" as well as an amnesia drug, when they find out something that the government doesnt want them to know. it slowly kills them.

anyone you know with cancer, or who has died from it, are victims of the government's conspiracy. they do not have a tumour, they have been infected by government agents. if they say this is untrue, it is either because of the amnesia drug, or because they are lying to you.

someone will probably close this thread saying i am offensive and insensitive. but that is just because they are part of the conspiracy too. closing this thread will only prove me right. i seriously, genuinely, solelmly believe this. i swear on my life.
_______________________________________________________________________
there is no difference in logic between this and flat-earth logic and arguments.
FEers, please explain why you disagree with this and agree with FE.

51
Flat Earth Q&A / cancer again
« on: January 23, 2007, 03:14:26 AM »
"cancer" does not exist. it is a conspiracy.

the government will infect people it doesnt like with a "cancer" as well as an amnesia drug, when they find out something that the government doesnt want them to know. it slowly kills them.

anyone you know with cancer, or who has died from it, are victims of the government's conspiracy. they do not have a tumour, they have been infected by government agents. if they say this is untrue, it is either because of the amnesia drug, or because they are lying to you.

someone will probably close this thread saying i am offensive and insensitive. but that is just because they are part of the conspiracy too. closing this thread will only prove me right. i seriously, genuinely, solelmly believe this. i swear on my life.
_______________________________________________________________________
there is no difference in logic between this and flat-earth logic and arguments.
FEers, please explain why you disagree with this and agree with FE.

52
Flat Earth Q&A / spotlight
« on: January 23, 2007, 03:08:19 AM »
if the sun orbits over the FE equator then wouldnt the sun look bigger from the equator than from the pole? this isnt really the case is it.

53
Flat Earth Q&A / FE space missions
« on: January 23, 2007, 03:06:58 AM »
is it possible to launch a rocket in FE? has a FEer ever made a half-decent one with a camera? how high can it go? could it fly round to the other side of the FE or up to the big dome over the earth?

54
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Parthenogenesis [Virgin Birth]
« on: January 23, 2007, 03:00:07 AM »
not possible for most mammals or us. reptile gender is not determined genetically. mammal gender is (except monotremes?) so no conception can occur without the crucial final X or Y chromosome from sperm. if it ever did happen (there are probably other reasons why it cant) the offspring would either be sterile or female since you cant obtain a Y from a woman. and jesus was a bloke.

its all bollocks and all probably due to a mistranslation of "young woman" to "virgin" or something. look at "maid" and "maiden" to see how easy this is. (cheers Dawkins)

55
Flat Earth Q&A / stars
« on: January 23, 2007, 02:55:08 AM »
Polaris lies above the rotational pole of the earth and stays put throughout the day and night. this is compatible with north-centered FE. what about the southern hemisphere? sigma octantis ( i think it is) is rather faint but still lies above the south pole and stays still during a whole rotation. how is this possible with FE? the star would have to be simultaneously above every point on the edge.

56
The Lounge / Your age?
« on: September 29, 2006, 09:40:37 AM »
20, but i dont act it

57
Flat Earth Q&A / Who Cares if the Earth is Round or Flat?
« on: September 29, 2006, 09:33:14 AM »
well i gat paid to work on space probes so i should be concerned as to the shape of the earth, if it wasnt round, everything i work on  would end up missing its target or ditching into the sea

58
Technology, Science & Alt Science / What is science?
« on: September 29, 2006, 08:43:11 AM »
SCIENCE:

you come up with an idea.

you use the idea to make predictions.

you conduct experiments to try and confirm the predictions.

you search for evidence to support the contradictions.

you get other people to independently gather evidence.

if the evidence  repeatedly confirms your predictions then your idea becomes a valid scientific theory.

if the evidence collected repeatedly proves inconclusive then your idea is rejected.

59
Flat Earth Q&A / Astronomical point
« on: September 29, 2006, 08:39:23 AM »
the two south polar stars? how do they work?  how can they by directly above  the rotational south pole of the south pole is actually the earth's circumference?

60
Flat Earth Q&A / Problems with a disc/spotlight sun
« on: September 29, 2006, 04:28:01 AM »
Quote from: "soggycrouton"
Bump. This has still not been replied to.

it never will be!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11