Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ezkerraldean

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11
271
The Lounge / Islam
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:47:34 AM »
Quote from: "Mephistopheles"


That's basically a central message of the Qu'ran in a nutshell.


i suggest you visit a mosque and enquire about that.

272
Flat Earth Q&A / the Conspiracy™
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:44:29 AM »
likewise,

"i have never seen the earth from space, so how do i know space travel is real"

273
Flat Earth Q&A / space travel in a flat earth universe
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:41:42 AM »
is it possible? has it been done yet?

274
Flat Earth Q&A / the Conspiracy™
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:35:19 AM »
it's the same as this

"cancer" does not exist. it is a conspiracy. i have never had cancer, so how can i be sure it is real?

the government will infect people it doesnt like with a "cancer" as well as an amnesia drug, when they find out something that the government doesnt want them to know. it slowly kills them.

anyone you know with cancer, or who has died from it, are victims of the government's conspiracy. they do not have a tumour, they have been infected by government agents. if they say this is untrue, it is either because of the amnesia drug, or because they are lying to you.

someone will probably close this thread saying i am offensive and insensitive. but that is just because they are part of the conspiracy too. closing this thread will only prove me right. i seriously, genuinely, solelmly believe this. i swear on my life.

there is no difference in logic between this and flat-earth shite.

275
Flat Earth Q&A / round earth since 3rd centry BC
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:21:59 AM »
yes

276
Flat Earth Q&A / A better reason for why objects "fall" to the grou
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:15:48 AM »
how can the "accelerating earth" bullshit account for the fact that acceleration due to gravity decreases measurably with altitude?

277
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:10:59 AM »
so am i wasting my time doing a planetary science course?


Armalcolite does not exist, then. that is what you are saying.

278
usually it is exposure time that is the reason for lack of stars. any planet or moon is going to be infinitely brighter than a mere background star.

279
Flat Earth Q&A / the Conspiracy™
« on: July 19, 2006, 10:05:14 AM »
do you have any objective, non-earth-shape-biased evidence for the conspiracy, or do you assume that the earth is flat and therefore conclude that there must be a conspiracy?

280
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Comets...
« on: July 18, 2006, 01:32:24 PM »
Quote from: "Erasmus"


Since you've been following along, you already know that I was asked, against my better judgement, to speculate.  Are you asking me to continue doing so?


if it is all still "speculation", then this is all clearly an under-developed and incomplete theory.

heliocentricity and spherical planets explains the movements of the planets and even allows us to send stuff there.
(oh no, that's the Conspiracy isn't it, even though i know numerous people in the field and that it is going to be my job in a few years)
that sounds the better explanation.

281
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Comets...
« on: July 18, 2006, 01:24:10 PM »
Quote from: "Erasmus"

Of course they are testable.  You just... go and look.


so when i look through a telescope, and see mars rotating slowly over several hours, and come back the next day to see the same features rotating with it - how is this an impurity on a crystal dome?

or is my telescope engineered by the Conspiracy™ ?

282
well, surely to prove that there is conspiracy you need to collect evidence. if there isnt any then it is either false or "unfalsifiable/unverifiable"

283
The Lounge / Islam
« on: July 18, 2006, 12:53:51 PM »
you're religious bigots aswell, now?

284
Quote from: "Mephistopheles"

It is impossible to prove the conspiracy wrong.  



unfalsifiable.
therefore, not science.

285
Flat Earth Information Repository / The Plane Truth
« on: July 18, 2006, 12:34:02 PM »
Quote


Yes, it's funny how they claim to be right, but none of them lift a finger to prove it.


haha
and a cruise to antarctica. it would make a nice family holiday and it would answer those nagging flat-earth questions, but they just wont do it.

286
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Comets...
« on: July 18, 2006, 12:29:07 PM »
Quote from: "Erasmus"

While that is really the provence of the REers on this board, I will make an attempt.  There is a rigid dome, or several domes, made of crystalline aether surrounding the Earth.  The otherwise perfect crystalline structure is ocassinally marked by impurities of various concentrations.  The impurities marr the crystal structure of the aether which prevents the crystal from being perfectly stable, and as it decays or erodes or otherwise settles into its lowest energy state it emits radiation on wide and varying spectra.  The largest of these impurities are the sun and moon.  Smaller ones include the other planets and comets.  The tiniest -- but by far the most numerous -- are the fixed stars.

It may be that the impurities involve oxygen in their formation, which would explain why the the impurities closer to the Earth (sun, moon, planets) are by far the largest and brightest.

Whoa... that was fun.



are these testable hypotheses?
i wait for the day when a flat-earth rocket is launched to investigate this.

287
Quote from: "Mephistopheles"


Basically, because the Earth is flat and there is mass information pointing to the Earth being round


doesnt that conflict a little bit?

288
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 12:18:49 PM »
so what about all the information gained from going to the moon? both manned and unmanned? the half a tonne of returned rocks? as well as the few kilos of soil returned by soviet probes? it contains minerals that do not exist on earth.

289
Flat Earth Q&A / michael palin
« on: July 18, 2006, 10:18:41 AM »
Quote from: "CrimsonKing"
how do you figure, the width of the Ice wall has been in contention since i got to this marvelous website, it has been considered as 10-1000s of miles, if you can see that far congratulations.  Many FErs also believe in a small antarctic landmass, which could have been the place in which this was filmed.


so it was faked. the BBC, and a prominent presenter famed for bringing the world to the british home TV lied to us all.

290
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 10:14:08 AM »
"sociaty"?
you need to educate yourself too.

"society" doesnt tell me anything about planetary science. i learn it from the people who do it - who plan missions, build probes, maintain them during flight and do the science on arrival.

291
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 10:10:30 AM »
Quote from: "CrimsonKing"
there is contention on what those "probes and sattellites" do after they are launched, most think they just fly off into nowhere and eventually land back on earth at some point.  Everything found during their "flight throught the cosmos" is all fabricated.
rue


you really need to educate yourself. no joke.

292
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 10:07:08 AM »
i know what you mean.
it just scares me that the stuff i do every day, in both the planetary science and the evo-devo fields, is simply deemed non-existant and evil by some people. all it is is science.

293
Quote from: "omfgthisisthebiggestbs"
These odd group of people known as "Flat-Earthers" read through these posts. If they don't understand something, or if they can't prove us "Round-Earthers" wrong, then they simply ignore it. It's actually pretty funny.

But, then again, if they're brave, they pick out one eensy little sentence and say something like "This is untrue. You are a moron."

I feel really bad for these "Flat-Earthers". Because they know that it has been proven to them wrong many times, but still they don't accept. Please, go to school.


spot on.

"there's no evidence"
"yes there is" -> [evidence]
"that evidence is a conspiracy"

294
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 10:03:09 AM »
Quote from: "CrimsonKing"
I agree, it is quite funny, practical applications of things that are as much unprovable as they are futile to think about


why are they unprovable? we are being taught the mechanisms for reaching other planets, the maths behind trajectories between two planets orbiting a star. and that is the way that space probes and sattellites are launched. why is that futile to think about?

295
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 09:57:40 AM »
Quote from: "CrimsonKing"
Well, they have enforced this conspiracy by keeping everyone involved on their side, and planetary science has been around since the begining of time  when a caveman looked up and said something like, OOOH PRETTY.  So there has to be the same things as any other science, books, courses, etc.


yes there are. funny how these courses involve the study and practical application of deep time, heliocentric star systems, and spheroidal planets.
and they are sponsored and allowed by humanity's highest establishments of learning - universities.

296
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 09:53:24 AM »
Quote from: "CrimsonKing"
Well since they are from JPL i would wager yes, but I dont know


well look at the sites and tell me. how have they enforced this Conspiracy? and why invent this particular part of the Conspiracy - planetary science?
even down to making university courses in planetary science, such as the one I am doing?

297
Flat Earth Q&A / The Problem with Eclipses
« on: July 18, 2006, 09:50:56 AM »
Sky dishes in the UK all point the same way, to a single geostationary sattellite.

298
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 09:48:57 AM »
i doubt it. they are quite transpareant, being so keen for funding as they are at ESA as well as NASA.

with JPL, are these from the Conspiracy?

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.cfm
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html

299
Flat Earth Q&A / Proove the NASA photos are fake
« on: July 18, 2006, 09:45:11 AM »
nah


i say again, which images, or sets of images, in particular, are deemed fake?

300
calculus is part of the Conspiracy. Don't use it.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11