Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The sun isn't as far as "they" say it is. It's really just a man-made object placed in the sky and we are made to believe it's this thing that gives us light and heat. In reality the universe isn't that cold and we don't really need a "sun" to survive.Oh really? I assume you are joking but in case someone is foolish to seriously suggest this:
If the sun is "really just aman-made object placed in the sky
It must have been before about 600 BCE because Anaximander who lived about 610 to 546 BCE felt the need to include the sun in his suggested cosmology.Anaximander was a very early Greek who lived before the Globe was introduced.QuoteAnaximander (c. 610—546 B.C.E.)Read the details at IEP, Anaximander
Anaximander was the author of the first surviving lines of Western philosophy. He speculated and argued about "the Boundless" as the origin of all that is. He also worked on the fields of what we now call geography and biology.
This is his universe:
The radial distances are in earth diameters but not knowing his earth diameter his distances and sizes cannot readily be determined.
The sun isn't as far as "they" say it is. It's really just a man-made object placed in the sky and we are made to believe it's this thing that gives us light and heat. In reality the universe isn't that cold and we don't really need a "sun" to survive.
Read Earth not a globe.
Where might one find more information on this? Curious about the "man-made" nature of the sun and how it is not necessary to survive.
You didn't even know how to view the post you just made this mornong. Don't make out that you understand how the forum works. Get out and let the admins ignore this properly.
Selecting a list and clicking the bullet points button only gives the first item a bullet point.
This means you always have to do it manually which is irritating and takes a while.
I don't expect anyone to fix it as no one gives a crap, but the fault is there and logged should a keen admin one day be appointed and go back through some of these old suggestions.
I'll make a big shout out to future FES users too. This message is from the distant past when the forum was owned by that awful Daniel guy that you successfully ousted in the end. If you ever feel nostalgia for him just remember how nothing ever got done.
No, that's not what you were saying. And you are welcome, Tool.After creating a post why does the page redirect to the forum instead of the thread that I actually I posted on. Everybody likes to proof read their post and check for mistakes so this just creates an additional step.
Sort it out non-super admins.
Go to Profile - Modify Profile - Look and Layout and tick the box next to Return to topics after posting by default , Dickface.
What I'm saying is it should be set as default because it would make more sense, you giant piece of noodle.
After creating a post why does the page redirect to the forum instead of the thread that I actually I posted on. Everybody likes to proof read their post and check for mistakes so this just creates an additional step.
Sort it out non-super admins.
Go to Profile - Modify Profile - Look and Layout and tick the box next to Return to topics after posting by default , Dickface.
"Do you have proof that these multi-billion dollar companies that manufacture these camera's aren't in on the conspiracy? Also ever heard of photoshop?"
Actually, you stated that camera companies are also part of the magnificent conspiracy. Therefore, the burden of proof lies upon you to prove it. You cannot argue that proof must be provided that camera companies are not involved in a conspiracy, without providing some evidence for your claim first.
Why is the earth so small in those photos? Why is the earth concave in the last picture? It is the result of a fish-eye lens. Am I to abandon common sense when accepting such evidence?
The idea that camera makers are in on the conspiracy is obnoxious.
Obviously. Roy did say like, not exactly the same as. Use a camera without a fisheye lense, see how it pans out.
I will have you banned again if you don't stop crying.This is when a thread should be locked.Ugh. Anyone know if we can ban people from threads?
I agree, a picture does not prove curvature because of the lens. Camera companies are in on this conspiracy with these lenses to make the earth look round. Have you ever wondered why you look fatter in pictures? It's because the lens makes you look rounder.
Every camera maker in the world is in on the conspiracy, now?
By the way, our last foray into high altitude pictures wound up with every flat earther running away after it was claimed that the lip of the earth curving behind itself was actually the day/night terminator, and I pointed out that the so called terminator was running east to west, roughly through northern virginia. Nary a peep after that.
Fair enough. I think I can lock this thread later today or tomorrow, unless you have an objection to that.
Not at all. I had no intention of creating a thread in the first place.
Sorry, I didn't think it was that cryptic.
The point being, contrails form at around 30'000 feet, yet we see the contrails trailing down over the horizon.
How is this possible on a FE?
This is also possible on FE.
Yeah, I don't really see why not. However...In fact, look outside your window and tell me if the ground is flat or curved?
...tell me, how would a normal person be able to detect a curvature of 0.09° per kilometre with the naked eye?
A curvature of 0.09° per kilometre can't be recognized with the naked eye because there isn't one. It's as simple as that.
Assuming it exists, would you be able to see it?
This is also possible on FE.
Yeah, I don't really see why not. However...In fact, look outside your window and tell me if the ground is flat or curved?
...tell me, how would a normal person be able to detect a curvature of 0.09° per kilometre with the naked eye?
But a better computer could recognize you might need to use 1+1=1
