I am sure that you have room full of little pony unicorns. All hopping around and crapping rainbow colored chocolate cakes. But as I said, you are not here and its no use to talk about it.
Similar to how nuclear power gets told.
Not similar. Because there are other people who learn it, deal with this stuff, there are people who have experienced it, died from it, governments who have to deal with nuclear waste left over from nuclear energy plants but you just deny it. There are no similarities here.
If you see magician do tricks in front of you then you experience it and have some idea about it.
So it is not the same as with nuclear power. You have only heard of it, have absolutely no knowledge what it is and no experience with it but you claim that its impossible.
If you have no clue how that magician does his/her tricks you are left with two options.
1. You can know it's a trick and try and find out how it's done.
2. You can be amazed by the magic of it and treat it as real and not a trick.
You fall into the second category.
No, you fall into the second category. But instead of being amazed you are disappointed and treat the trick as magic. Your nuclear power is perfect example of it. You always call it magic but you don't even try to work out how it works.
No, you can't dispute it if you have absolutely no knowledge about it and have no experience with it. You don't have to accept it and you don't have to believe it but you can't dispute it.
Ok.
You tell me a story about seeing a ghostly man riding a bike. You tell me that you keep experiencing this on your walk in the woods with your adult art magazines .
I dispute it which angers you, so I ask you to show me this ghost of a man on his bike.
Every day we go at the times you mention and every day we see nothing, or I see nothing and you shout, "there he is, can you see him."
I say no and carry on disputing.
Are you telling me that I have to take your word for it like you are doing with those that feed you this type of stuff, from ghosts to religion to magical energy and so on and so on?
Let me make it clear what I mean by "dispute". If you are disputing something then you must have some some experience and knowledge about thing you dispute. Disputing isn't just statements like "I don't believe", "its impossible", "it cannot work" and other statement without any explanations why it cannot work or why it is impossible and so on. In you example you don't dispute me, you just express your disbelief and ask evidence. You can't argue against me why I can't see ghost bike. Maybe you have some disability which prevents you seeing it. Maybe I have some disease which makes me see some objects differently from you. If you have no knowledge about what happens then you can't argue against it with any reasonable argument because you don't have any. You can only express your disbelief.
I have said that I don't care what you think or imagine about nuclear power. I asked quite concrete question - how you determine how much energy is packed inside something? Can you answer that or do you always must ramble about something else?
In terms of your nuclear power I have no clue how they determine how they get 25 years out of some pellets of uranium so called hard metal inside a rod that only uses 20% in that 25 years, apparently.
And in terms of any other object? Can you determine how much energy is in piece of wood? Piece of coal? Pack of C4? My point is that if you cannot determine how much energy is in any other objects then how can you determine that there is no such energy inside nuclear material as others say there is?