Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Explain alternative facts.in my light but particular research of alternative science
Your research of "alternative science" -- I've never heard of such a thing. Is it like "alternative facts"?
in my light but particular research of alternative science
Your problem is in looking at external atmosphere as wind as if something is blowing in the wind.Oh. So your "atmospheric vortex" doesn't move any air (wind). No wonder that was confusing.
Are you really that dense? Any moron can see "what happened" -- the free magnet first moved away from the magnet in my hand and then moved toward it. You still have not explained how your magical "atmospheric vortex push" changes direction.I've just told you what happened.Orientate a magnet and it will do this so what the hell are you talking about? The only difference is it's not attraction, it's another push towards the other magnet instead of against it, due to orientation of that magnet.
I did not change the orientation of the magnet in my hand. As I moved the magnet toward the second magnet, the second magnet first moved away and then it moved toward the magnet in my hand. You claim it was first "pushed" away and then "pushed" toward the magnet in my hand. But you have never explained how the "push" changed direction according to your rubbish theory.
Orientate a magnet and it will do this so what the hell are you talking about? The only difference is it's not attraction, it's another push towards the other magnet instead of against it, due to orientation of that magnet.
Pay attention John. I talked about the camera being far enough away that no stitching together of images would be involved, because the camera could see the whole earth (one side of, obviously). And even if one allowed the argument that the flat earth in curved space would appear round, why would some of the continents be missing? All the continents would presumably show up the picture if the earth were flat. Here's NASA picture number AS17-148-22726 taken during Apollo 17 from a distance of about 24,000 km. No stitching involved.As Leo Ferrari points out - a flat earth in curved space would appear round. Also they don't take pictures of the whole earth - they stitch them together. ( https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html )There's no experiment that proves a globe.
Yes there is, and it has been performed numerous times. It's is very expensive to do, but simple in concept, and has produced reliable, repeatable results. You use a rocket to get a camera far enough away from the earth to take a whole-earth picture. You know -- like this one:
There's no experiment that proves a globe.
Come on you flat Earth guys... if you want to try and prove anything you will have to do a LOT better than this!Realizing, of course, that it is impossible to prove the earth is flat.
By all means have a dig but can you offer any explanation as to why magnets work as they do?The push is the atmospheric crashing from one side of the magnet to the other, which creates the resistance to the atmosphere trying to equalise from the other end.This is your explanation of how the push on the magnet in the image I posted changes direction??
It creates a push around.
Can you imagine using this as an explanation of how magnetism works to kids in high school? They wouldn't have a clue what you were talking about. Come to think of it, can you imagine anyone apart from Sceptimatic understanding exactly what this means? Because I certainly don't.
The push is the atmospheric crashing from one side of the magnet to the other, which creates the resistance to the atmosphere trying to equalise from the other end.
It creates a push around.
If you have a material that can also trap extreme lower pressure (expanded molecules) atmosphere then you also have the same effect of the higher pressure trying to crush the object.
This is where magnets come in where lower pressure is trapped and higher pressure is also trapped within.
The higher pressure is the direct result of lowering the pressure inside the metal to become a magnet.
This creates a resistance to likewise magnets.
Then why is there a south on the compass?Where is this south on the compass, pointing towards?The opposite of North.
Compasses help your navigation by telling what direction is north and south. It was even used for early mapping techniques. On the flat earth map, a north pole exists but what south pole are the compasses pointing towards?If the compass needle is pointing toward the north pole and you can't figure out the other three directions from that, you must need help.
If you have a material that can also trap extreme lower pressure (expanded molecules) atmosphere then you also have the same effect of the higher pressure trying to crush the object.
This is where magnets come in where lower pressure is trapped and higher pressure is also trapped within.
The higher pressure is the direct result of lowering the pressure inside the metal to become a magnet.
This creates a resistance to likewise magnets.
Before I even attempt to explain I want you to tell me what is happening with the Magdeburg hemispheres.In the Magdeburg experiment, when the pump is connected, the valve opened, and the pump turned on, each cycle of the pump adds the volume of the pump chamber to the volume of the sphere. This allows the air to expand into the pump chamber, and since P*V/T has to stay constant, and the total volume has increased, the pressure inside becomes slightly smaller. The pump then expels the air from the pump chamber and the cycle repeats, each cycle reducing the pressure inside. At some point the valve is closed and the pressure inside the sphere is much lower than the atmospheric pressure outside.
If you don't know then just say and I'll enlighten you on this first before I get back to the magnets.
I completely understand the Magdeburg hemispheres experiment.If you can't put your mind to it you'll always come back with this stuff.Real scientists do hypothesize. Then they look at experimental evidence to see if their hypothesis holds up. When it doesn't, they abandon that hypothesis, and admit it was wrong.It's called hypothesizing.I'm not interested in another psychology course.
It's not a course you need -- it's treatment. You need to understand why you make up stuff.
If one generously credits your statement that there is no such thing as attraction as a hypothesis, and then an experiment show magnet attracting another magnet, you, as a "scientist" are compelled to explain how that fits your hypothesis.
So you make up another hypothesis: That some kind magical atmospheric air pressure difference creates a vortex that "pushes" the other magnet from the opposite side (even though in the experiment there is no evidence of a vortex strong enough to push a magnet being felt by the experimenter).
That's already enough evidence that any scientist would abandon such a hypothesis. But then you are presented with an experiment where a magnet first repels and then attracts a second magnet, which is so incompatible with your hypothesis that you don't even attempt to explain it. You just lie by saying you explained it.
Time to abandon your rubbish hypothesis and admit it is wrong!
You mention a vortex not strong enough but you can clearly understand how the Magdeburg hemispheres work, can't you.
If you can then enlighten me on what you think happens with those hemispheres and we can move on from this point because this may just help you understand the forces involved.
Real scientists do hypothesize. Then they look at experimental evidence to see if their hypothesis holds up. When it doesn't, they abandon that hypothesis, and admit it was wrong.It's called hypothesizing.I'm not interested in another psychology course.
It's not a course you need -- it's treatment. You need to understand why you make up stuff.
If the gas were contained by some kind of external container, then the pressure everywhere inside that container would be the same. But we know that gas pressure gets smaller as we go up in elevation. That rules out an external container.
It is contained one way or another, we ALL know this from deduction and established scientific law - there are no other options even in potentia. Gravitation (if it were in any way real) isn't powerful enough to do the job you need it to for your worldview - this is plain fact and easy to demonstrate for yourself. Gas pressure is derived from the container walls - there can be no pressure without them (though the container can in theory, be "fields" of some sort)
Remember, "gravitation" is believed (never measured, it isn't measurable or real)You are either ignorant of the facts, not believing the facts, or lying. I don't know which. But if it is a case of ignorance, maybe we can dispel that. Here is the best experiment I know of the measures gravitational constant:
I'm not interested in another psychology course.
Why do you lie by saying I haven't?People lie for a variety of reasons.
What is your reason?
Why do you lie by saying you have explained how the "push" on the magnet changes directions when you have not explained it?
People lie for a variety of reasons.
A push against anything randomly shaped will offer the same end product.You have already been given this example, where you have yet to answer (because you can't) how the "push" on the lower magnet changes directions according to your rubbish theory.
What do I need to observe that proves anything against what I'm saying?
Give me something.
I'm not sure what the hell you're trying to say with this.
You mean you're not sure how the hell to answer the question using your rubbish theory.
The lower magnet is clearly first repelled ("pushed" away from) and then attracted to (in your theory "pushed" toward) the other magnet. Explain how your so-called "atmospheric push" changes direction. If you can't explain it, that shows your theory is rubbish.
I have explained but you've clearly took no notice of my explanation.
Since you just keep lying by saying you have provided an explanation when you have not, I have created a new profile image for you to use:
I have explained but you've clearly took no notice of my explanation.
STOP LYING
Provide the answer in a response to this post, or admit you can't.
