Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Stash

Pages: 1 ... 196 197 [198] 199 200 ... 205
5911
Flat Earth General / Re: Japanese fakery
« on: September 26, 2018, 12:31:05 AM »
Insufficient only if I needed your agreement for self validation. I don't. The future is unchanged whether your agree or not

No, I mean, 'I know what I know' is insufficient, not just for me, but for anyone, about any topic, any time, anywhere. And I'm not looking to offer or deny you self validation, it's just that, typically, when you make a claim, you should back it up. You know, with some facts, maybe even a clever anecdote to spice it up. But a 'I know what I know', is. well, kinda lame. Kind of defeats the entire purpose of discourse.

5912
Flat Earth General / Re: Unanswered Question: TanX - SinX = ?
« on: September 26, 2018, 12:09:45 AM »
0.7071^2+0.2929=0.7929
0.7071+0.2929^2=0.7929
1 + [ (1+1) - 1.4142 ] = 1.5858
1.4142 + 0.4142^2 = 1.5858
etc. etc.

There are so many hints to confirm phew=3.17157.

You too can figure out the rest.

How did you derive 0.7071^2+0.2929 from a "1×1 square"? What was your starting value of '1x1'?

5913
Flat Earth General / Re: Japanese fakery
« on: September 26, 2018, 12:02:26 AM »
50/50 is not exactly a fair gamble. The sheer amount of variables that go in to land a rover successfully on a speeding asteroid with 21st century technology would be far less than a 50% chance of success.

According to whom? What is the basis for your calculation?

Either way, I know what I know. Your belief is not necessary

Never claimed my belief was necessary. But 'I know what I know' is a woefully insufficient response to just about anything.

5914
Flat Earth General / Re: Unanswered Question: TanX - SinX = ?
« on: September 25, 2018, 11:32:07 PM »


In a square of 0.7071×0.2929, a 45° arch stays. The length of the diagonal within this square equals 0.765366.
The scale: r=1.

And how did you decide on this measurement of a square: 0.7071×0.2929?

5915
Flat Earth General / Re: Japanese fakery
« on: September 25, 2018, 11:28:42 PM »
Perhaps the probe failed en route or crashed on landing. To keep shareholders happy and money flowing in for future projects they concocted this to 'prove' they are successful at what they do. I dont have a problem with this as we need money to get these projects off the ground (pun intended). If all the agencies willing to do this lost their funding, we would never get the chance. I'm just pointing out this is not Ryugu. I'm surprised you all see a pretty picture and believe it to be the truth just because of the source.

I'm all in on the money thing. I've got no problem buying into to the fact that humans do all kinds of shitty things just for money. No mystery there.

The mystery is this: "I'm just pointing out this is not Ryugu."

And this: "I'm surprised you all see a pretty picture and believe it to be the truth just because of the source."

Firstly, I wouldn't know one way or another if that is Ryugu. However, I'd argure that you wouldn't know either.

Secondly, defaulting to untrue is just as dubious as defaulting to true. 50/50. I think I have a 1% edge b/c of the source. I guess, the abnormal question would be, "What do you know that I don't?"

5916
Sure but first you show me photos of spherical earth, No no not the CGI and photo shopped Masonic bull shit.

You say 'sure', but you've already stated that you have none. We are to take your visions on faith. So why do you enter into a tit for tat argument? "I'll show you mine, if you show me yours." if you genuinely have none?

Secondarily, if we are in a globe matrix, as you claim, might we not have images of a globe, albeit, of a matrix-y type. Even if our images were of a globe, CGI or not, you would simply claim they are the matrix-y type.

Finally, if we presented images of a globe to you, they would not be CGI, but actually, simply, images of the matrix, in globe form, as you have conveyed to us. So, in essence, globe images are not CGI, they are of your globe matrix you claim we are living in now.

So I'm not sure why you would claim our images of a globe to be fake, masonic or otherwise. They are actually yours.

5917
Flat Earth General / Re: Japanese fakery
« on: September 25, 2018, 11:05:16 PM »
The simple reason why people would forge this shit is money. I'm not saying landing a rover on an asteroid and taking pretty pictures is impossible. I'm saying it wasn't done in this case

Why not done 'in this case'? In what case could it be done and why specifically not this case?

5918
Flat Earth General / Re: Unanswered Question: TanX - SinX = ?
« on: September 25, 2018, 10:45:26 PM »
What did you mean, Stash?
Everything goes well with my formulae, no error in such calculation. Only tried to provide the better n nicer look for easier comprehending.

Yes, where exactly did this come from (bolded):

Here's another hints:
Phew/2 = r + (45°diagonal)^2
= 1 + 0.765366^2
= 1.58578


5919
Flat Earth General / Re: Unanswered Question: TanX - SinX = ?
« on: September 25, 2018, 06:37:30 PM »
Mine, while sin is moving, there is additional value accompanying  i.e. the difference, so as to form a length of tan.

I'm pretty sure this is the best part, the made up part (bolded).

5920
Flat Earth Debate / Re: No one knows <Side perspective>_It's the key
« on: September 25, 2018, 03:44:37 PM »
Observations and notes:

The atmoplane can not be disregarded until REers fully consider FET data.  Do not turn your backs on what is real.

Those of us that have crossed Lake Pontchartrain bridge while observing the surroundings realize there is more to FET after crossing it than before.  Study bridge building if you want to understand arcs of construction.   

Can't speak to bridge building, but take for example the Stanford Linear Accelerator, a two mile long structure that was engineered and constructed to the finest of tolerances. As part of the ongoing LiCAS = Linear Collider Alignment and Survey project, newer systems have been developed to better account for earth's curvature when building such structures.

"HYDROSTATIC LEVELLING SYSTEM (HLS)
Since the accelerator could follow the curvature of the earth and the wire has limitations as height reference because of the sag, a drift-free HLS was developed."

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C04100411/papers/048.PDF

5921
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 23, 2018, 11:07:45 AM »
However, ladies and gentlemen, the important thing (for me) is that I need to collect agreements or disagreements about the very basic principle of  a pendulum: it continuously moves under the action of co-planar forces. When this point is agreed, I proceed with Bob experiments. Actually, for step 4 I'll need to move Bob around the Earth. Ooooops, sorry, not "around" the Earth but "along" the Earth. In different locations.

Step 4 is about to come.

Agreed.

5922
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 22, 2018, 12:40:48 PM »
Step 3

Now we (or better, our observer who doesn't know very much about Earth), are facing what is called a "pendulum". He is observing a bob (let's use this name), which swings back and forth around its neutral position.
He sees that every time the bob is left, some oscillations start, and these oscillations always remain in the same plane. He can understand why this happens: just referring to his (our) steps 1 and 2, he knows that, for some reason yet to be understood, the weight force, which is always vertical, lies in a geometrical plane together with the reaction force in the rope.

Now, sorry, but I need to stop because I have to throw again the periodic and fundamental question to everybody:

would you all agree that the pendulum oscillates constantly in the same geometrical plane when left free? 

(I've got a bad feeling that, despite my intention to accelerate, here in step 3 I will be forced to slow down and reply to several objections... ok, I decided to go this way)   8)
I hadn’t really noticed your intention to accelerate.
Anyway, I think most of us are going to come up with something along the lines of “Not necessarily”, and we are going to grind to a halt around step 3.5 amid murmurings about Foucault and The “C” word, and then Wise, or MOTD or whatever he is called this week will plaster the page with copy n paste sums.
In fact good money says that’s what will happen:)

Agreed, the smart money is definitely on a forthcoming Wise dissertation.

In any case, my understanding is that a pendulum has to be "launched". In essence, it has to be set in motion and will not generally start oscillating on its own. Has our observer (Who I will now call Bob), has Bob touched the bob in any way to initiate it's movement?

5923
Flat Earth General / Re: We Sleep
« on: September 21, 2018, 03:09:39 PM »
The NWO has everything to do with the flat Earth. They are the ones that created the fake ball earth.
Just when did this "NWO . . . . create the fake ball earth"?
The answer to that is vital simply because whether you, dutchy or others like it or not, the earth has been considered a Globe by those interested for some 2500 years!

You appear to be claiming the Earth is a sphere because tradition.

What do you have against tradition? 

In any case, according to N30, the NWO created the fake ball earth notion 2500 years ago and has maintained it's NWO-ieness ever since - kind of like a tradition.

5924
Flat Earth General / Re: Flat Earth Directly Benefits My Daily Life
« on: September 20, 2018, 07:21:36 PM »
Jesus! I was this close to burning my registration, canceling my GEICO autopay and halfway through making my own license plate with a piece of cardboard and a sharpie.

5925
Flat Earth General / Re: Flat Earth Directly Benefits My Daily Life
« on: September 20, 2018, 04:36:08 PM »
... this thread is more about our Constitutional right to travel...

Where, specifically, do you think the right to travel is enumerated in the Constitution of the United States?

Like all of his misinterpreted synonyms, I think he's confusing 'travel' with 'assemble'. But hey, maybe one has to travel to 'peaceably assemble' somewhere.

5926
You know a lot of fancy words for someone who is not even from America LOL In any case you guys within globe matrix think that if a person has a vision he is a lunatic or crazy, yet all your religions are based on testimonies of people that had visions. Explain that to me LOL

So does this make your belief a religion as well?

5927
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 19, 2018, 05:22:30 PM »
Don't let the angry globularists rush you. We're with you to step 3.

Guilty as charged.

Yes, ready for step 3.

5928
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 19, 2018, 04:34:23 PM »
I have many treasures, but these belong to step 100 or 150...

According to my calculations, at the rate this is going, posting a step every 3 days, we'll get to Step 100 on Tuesday, July 16, 2019 and Step 150 on Friday, December 13, 2019.

Just suggesting that you may want to speed things up a smidge.

5929
Flat Earth General / Re: Books on the Flat Earth.
« on: September 18, 2018, 10:04:29 PM »
Anyone wishing to write a book about PHEW FET, please let me know.  8)

What is PHEW FET and where can I find a repository of information about it?

5930
Flat Earth General / Re: Please Explain What Earth Looks Like.
« on: September 18, 2018, 05:52:34 PM »
But a conspiritard will never let a few inconvenient facts get in the way of a "good" conspiracy.

I'd argue it's not even a good one. Just boring. Better to stick with the globe earth conspiracy, it's got everything: Money, illuminati/Masonic NASA, advanced CGI, hidden lands beyond the wall, secret nazi bases in Antarctica, the whole of Australia doesn't exist. Sexy, very sexy.

5931
Flat Earth General / Re: Please Explain What Earth Looks Like.
« on: September 18, 2018, 05:18:13 PM »
I was hoping N30 was joking about chemtrails. And I was about to mention HAARP. No need for that, it seems. Every conspiracy theory swallowed hook, line, and sinker.

Was Al Gore joking about chemtrails?

No, he wasn't joking. In fact he wasn't even talking about it. For goodness sake, do you blindly believe every conspiracy theory that comes across your desk?

5932
Flat Earth General / Re: Flat Earth Directly Benefits My Daily Life
« on: September 18, 2018, 11:10:22 AM »
Argue all you want, but we as Americans have the right to travel, be it walking, riding a horse, or zooming down the road in a car, that is our right. The freedom of movement.

That road you're zooming down in your car to get a loaf of bread, how did it get there? Who maintains it? Where did that stop sign come from?

What gives a gov't the right to place a stop sign and demand you to stop? Maybe you should be protesting stop signs. Freedom!

5933
Flat Earth General / Re: Flat Earth "Leader" Gets His Best 5 Points Ruined!!
« on: September 17, 2018, 02:18:03 PM »
Apparently, every 6 hours or so, every day, coincidentally in perfect unison with the orbit of the moon.

5934
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 17, 2018, 02:10:42 PM »
I wonder if we can skip to the step that says, "Ergo, the shape of the earth is...".

5935
Flat Earth General / Re: What's the motive?
« on: September 16, 2018, 03:07:46 PM »
If Flat Earth was common knowledge, how successful would TV shows like Star Trek/Wars/Gate, all the movies and computer games like Mass Effect be?

I'm not sure I'm following. If FE was common knowledge these entertainment vehicles would seemingly be just as successful. Imagery might be different, but it's not like the success or failure of these is predicated on the shape of the earth.

5936
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Step by step
« on: September 15, 2018, 01:32:42 PM »
I'm not sure, at this rate, I'm going to have the patience for 150 steps. So, for the sake of brevity and expeditiousness:

"Would you all agree that in this environment any object feels a force that we can call weight?"

Let's stick with the rock. Yes, it has "weight".

Step 2?


5937
Flat Earth General / Re: First Man
« on: September 15, 2018, 10:31:53 AM »
Context buddy context.
See you don't ever answer the very reasonable question what would happen during the Vietnam war (the reality of that dirty war was coming out more by the day)  and the ongoing racial riots that were a severe threat for the stability in the homeland....if an Apollo disaster would also happen in front of 100+ million viewers who wanted to feel some national pride again....and comfort of still being on top of the world after being repeatedly beaten by the Russians ?
So care for answering this time around ?
No of course you won't......

Yes, I agree, context is key. Your assertion that Apollo was faked in an effort stave off instability and bolster national pride is wildly out of context as to what was happening in America at the time.
If memory serves, you do recall America was far from any sort of a dream or supremacy and a moon landing seemed to have little impact as to such considering what was going on around the time of Apollo, i.e., Civil Rights, Vietnam, Watergate, MLK/RFK, just to name a few. Apollo was a blip on the national radar in comparison to what was happening in the country around that time frame. Your logic is flawed.

And remember, there were six moon landings, not one, not two, but six. A logical, thinking person might surmise, yes, any conspiracy worth it's salt and one that is overwhelmingly well funded, would never 'rinse and repeat' and certainly not 5 more times - Too much exposure, one and done is all that is required to restore national pride, maybe two, but that's pushing it. Why 4 more? And even after six, American national pride and global supremacy was never subject to any form of restoration given the events and landscape of the time. In fact, things got worse.

But a person like you, after pondering such a notion then adjusts the brim on their well crafted tinfoil helmet, swirls a couple of lithium capsules into a coffee cup of fortified wine left over from last nights binge and queues up several Youtube videos from the likes of globebusters and math powerland and gets back to some serious research.

5938
Flat Earth Debate / Re: So, I guess telescopes are selective?
« on: September 14, 2018, 07:29:33 PM »
At the north the dome meets the ground. It gives a fit position for a sunlight reflection that be seen on arctic circle.
That doesn't matter. You still have the light having to travel much further.
If it was going to be blocked from viewing to the south, it would also be blocked viewing to the north.

The bottom of the dome is situated quite near from Arctic circle. So the amount of the clouds are much less. Also, the sun's reflection position at the dome stays near as well. It can be regarded that the 'sun' is near too. That's the ingredient of so called 'daytime' -- even though it occurs at midnight hours.

How high is the dome, at it's peak?
How near or far is the Sun? Is it beneath the dome or above the dome?
What is the dome made of?
Why can't I see the dome with a telescope?

I have questions and you seemingly may have answers.

5939
Flat Earth General / Re: First Man
« on: September 14, 2018, 03:13:13 PM »
What if a disaster would have happened on live tv in the midst of a dirty war in Vietnam and racial riots on homeground ?
It could have been the beginning of a total revolution against the government who screwed up the last bit of American pride and dignity with a failed moonlanding in front of more than 100 million Americans.
Are you really believing they took that chance ? Hope for the best that nothing goes terribly wrong in front of 70% of the whole nation while trying to put back some positivity in the homeland ?
They had only one option...a 100% succussfull event in front of more than 100 million Americans and many young and hopefull children...the future generation of America's dream and supremacy.

If memory serves, 100 million Americans and more around the world watched two space shuttle disasters live on TV.

5940
Flat Earth General / Re: First Man
« on: September 14, 2018, 02:43:47 PM »
I would say here in the States about 30 percent of the population do not believe in moon landings and another 50 percent are very skeptical. So this leaves only 20 percent of people who firmly believe.

"Far-fetched as the hoax theory may seem, a 1999 Gallup poll showed that it's comparatively durable: 6% of Americans said they thought the lunar landings were fake, and 5% said they were undecided.”

http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1860871_1860876_1860992,00.html

Pages: 1 ... 196 197 [198] 199 200 ... 205