Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Heavenly Breeze

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
61
Flat Earth General / Re: Sandokhan's date of the great flood
« on: December 31, 2019, 10:15:13 AM »
1600 and 1800?  How do you figure?  My great grandfather was alive in the mid 1800s.  You'd think there'd be some stories passed down.  What's going on here?
He changed up his mind as more "evidence ???" came in.

I concluded about Sandokhan - I heard a ringing, but I donít know where it is. Vivat the great thinker Sandokhan  :P
 
+++

Sandokhan - come to us in Russia or Ukraine, and you will understand how wrong you are. Since it is here that research is being conducted about which you write. You listen to bloggers who want money, this is populism for making money. Those who are engaged in research, on the contrary, damp money in their expeditions, and they have really interesting research and explanation, without a general nuclear war of 1812

62
Flat Earth General / Re: Sandokhan's date of the great flood
« on: December 30, 2019, 11:42:28 AM »
Excuse me, what does all this have to do with the shape of the earth? Flood it and in Africa flood. And the shape of the land doesn't play a role at all. Another thing is an alternative story. Neither does it refer to the shape of the earth.
You are quite right but Sandokhan has this massive thread called "Advanced Flat Earth Theory" in the "Flat Earth Believers" forum.
He thinks that all these do play a role.

It starts with this post Advanced Flat Earth Theory ę on: July 15, 2009, 12:59:41 AM Ľ.

That might make it clear.

Thanks for the explanation. I personally am in an expeditionary club to study our past. And I know all these theories not by hearsay, because I know their authors. In the English-speaking sector, this is an interpretation of them. And the primary sources are in Russian, and you need to know the language in order to understand what is at stake. That's why Sandokhan dates are floating - since all the time new theories have been put forward with the appearance of artifacts discovered in expeditions. Let Sandokhan first gain his mind and then write about the flood. Or in extreme cases, ask people what they are doing research.
The actual dates of the flood that destroyed the past world are 1600, the second cycle is 1800. But the bottom line is that time is cyclical, and reality is changeable. In this period of time, our reality itself is changing - therefore no one will now say what really happened. Changing reality is confirmed by documents and artifacts. But again, this has nothing to do with the shape of the earth.
Rather Sandokhan - proves that the earth is a sphere, since all the research of our club says that such a flood was possible only on the earth's globe, when permafrost and Antarctica appeared from the fall of a celestial body on the earth and its rotation! Sandokhan will never be able to explain the physics of the last flood on flat earth. He sat in a puddle, just like with a gyrocompass.

63
Flat Earth General / Re: Sandokhan's date of the great flood
« on: December 29, 2019, 08:39:57 AM »
Excuse me, what does all this have to do with the shape of the earth? Flood it and in Africa flood. And the shape of the land doesn 't play a role at all. Another thing is an alternative story. Neither does it refer to the shape of the earth.

64
Flat Earth General / Re: Proof that Antarctica is out of bounds
« on: December 14, 2019, 08:59:32 PM »
Proof that Antarctica is out of bounds

What do you mean by that expression?

What border does Antarctica go beyond?

65
Elon needs more Satan. The upcoming roadster is the very definition of meh it comes to styling. How does he do it?!

Santa Claus steers.

66
Flat Earth General / Re: Height of the Dome Calculated by Meteor Velocity
« on: December 03, 2019, 08:12:29 PM »
I get the feeling some people on this site are not interested in facts preferring instead to just invent their own version of 'reality' regardless.
When it comes to the opening statement of this thread which falls in the 'alternative reality' ballpark. One only has to spend a few evenings of the yeas on prescribed dates looking at the heavens to experience the true reality of meteors.
In early January there is the Qaudrantids
In April the Lyrids
In May the Eta Aquariids
In July the Delta Aquariids
In early August the Alpha Capricornids
In mid-August the Perseids
In early October the Draconids
In late October the Orionids and the Taurids
In December the Leonidsand the Ursids.

All these showers are associated with Comet tails or some other heavenly body which we happen to pass through on predicted dates. The nonsense posted by the originator of this discussion clearly demonstrates the lengths some people will go to avoid the realities of the world.


Are you definitely interested in the facts? Do you know why WHOLE of our world has recently been divided by a wall into blue and red parts?

I think the discussion is always useful, otherwise you will not believe this fact. But archaeologists have already proven it by finding rings on which everything is depicted.

And that once again proves that the earth is a ball...

I haven't the faintest what you're on about.

**All these showers are associated with Comet tails or some other heavenly body which we happen to pass through on predicted dates. The nonsense posted by the originator of this discussion clearly demonstrates the lengths some people will go to avoid the realities of the world.**

About it.
It is very hard to find the truth. Although everything lies in plain sight. No one pays attention to real facts. Both believers in the flat world and believers in the ball. Sorry.

67
Flat Earth General / Re: Height of the Dome Calculated by Meteor Velocity
« on: December 03, 2019, 02:43:44 AM »
There are a number of sources of info on the Internet which describe how meteor velocities are measured.  Here's one example.

https://www.britastro.org/radio/projects/Detection_of_meteors_by_RADAR.pdf

+

68
Flat Earth General / Re: Height of the Dome Calculated by Meteor Velocity
« on: December 03, 2019, 02:39:46 AM »
I get the feeling some people on this site are not interested in facts preferring instead to just invent their own version of 'reality' regardless.
When it comes to the opening statement of this thread which falls in the 'alternative reality' ballpark. One only has to spend a few evenings of the yeas on prescribed dates looking at the heavens to experience the true reality of meteors.
In early January there is the Qaudrantids
In April the Lyrids
In May the Eta Aquariids
In July the Delta Aquariids
In early August the Alpha Capricornids
In mid-August the Perseids
In early October the Draconids
In late October the Orionids and the Taurids
In December the Leonidsand the Ursids.

All these showers are associated with Comet tails or some other heavenly body which we happen to pass through on predicted dates. The nonsense posted by the originator of this discussion clearly demonstrates the lengths some people will go to avoid the realities of the world.


Are you definitely interested in the facts? Do you know why WHOLE of our world has recently been divided by a wall into blue and red parts?

I think the discussion is always useful, otherwise you will not believe this fact. But archaeologists have already proven it by finding rings on which everything is depicted.

And that once again proves that the earth is a ball...

69
Flat Earth General / Re: Height of the Dome Calculated by Meteor Velocity
« on: December 02, 2019, 10:25:56 PM »
You are not a careful reader. The base of the map depends on distances in Europe being reliable. I've many times said it.
Maybe "You've many times said it" but that does not make it true.

And the distances in the Southern Hemisphere are also known to good accuracy but you cannot admit it because it proves your map quite wrong.

That might be why Tom Bishop and Sandokhan both claim that maps like yours are quite wrong and propose different layout:
That's funny! Tom Bishop who knows a thousand times as much you about the flat earth says that flight fits on his flat earth just fine.
His continental layout looks like the one on the left and Sandokhan, who's infinitely smarter than you has similar ideas like the one one the left.

FE Bipolar Map
Promoted by Tom Bishop
   

Sandokhan's
"True" Flat Earth Map
So why shouldn't that QANTAS flight QFA63 be a genuine flight? It's flown 5 times a week!

Quote from: totallackey
"Someone told someone else this story and someone else put together these cool pictures!"
No, Jerry Williams, a real person and that's his real name, flew non-stop from Sydney to Johannesburg and videoed the whole flight.
The video shown has excerpts from it and details of the route from Jerry's GPS.

Knocking a hoof as a sign of solidarity.  And I suggest you read the most CORRECT maps. Since it is impossible to move the projection of the ball to an infinite horizon. Actually, to be honest with yourself. That 's not possible to make the right map at all. Since, according to the laws of rhymodynamics, all dimensions are always relative. You need to understand in which plane you want to have some idea of the dimensions. Space will bend. Read the works of scientists as they tried to measure distances in the mountains, and what came out of it. Our land inside is hollow, and its shell behaves exactly according to the laws of physics.


There are English subtitles. Don 't complain, try to understand, I 'm trying to write in English!


70
Flat Earth General / Re: Height of the Dome Calculated by Meteor Velocity
« on: November 29, 2019, 11:50:15 PM »
I was lucky enough to see this meteor live with naked eyes...  It took about 40 seconds between appearing over the eastern horizon and disappearing over the west.
There is no way this could have come from any kind of dome.

https://sattrackcam.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/more-on-21-september-2012-fireball-why.html

How sad it is. You argue about stupid things. I saw how in 3 seconds a group of UFOs flew from horizon to horizon. And what, how can some movement in the sky determine the height of a certain vault?
Stupidity is utterly ...

71
Flat Earth General / Re: Should I come out to my mom as a flat earther
« on: November 03, 2019, 03:08:37 AM »
 Better to dad, heíll get the belt. The belt is also flat.  C:-)

72
Hello to all flat earthlings. I think I now understand why languages ​​other than English will never sound on this site. If administrators allow this, the site will close. Once again I see how they mock Russian here, using the concepts introduced by the Russians for their own selfish purposes. I just felt disgusted to visit this English site.
Iím also more than sure that in the next 100 years this site and the flat earthlings themselves, as well as other people, will no longer exist. Our civilization will end. A neutron star with a period of revolution around the sun of 600 years. It will come nearer to our planet again and then it may turn out that after its departure the atmosphere will not be enough to support breathing. And in the future, even the earth itself may no longer exist, as the Phaeton died ...
Sorry all this nonsense of yours with the symbols from the Bible is just nonsense. Eilon Max - perhaps the last hope of people to extend their existence. I know that Iím stepping on administrators, but you probably will never understand the truth. And that why the earth - and the flat and the ball - except for the Russian no one can explain this to you. But they donít want to see Russians here. Although the Russians are those who founded our entire civilization. I think you all here should first study your story, and then engage in discussions. Here is a site with the information that will help you realize your place in life. And I hope that you will no longer pervert the Russian language and the concepts introduced by the Russians.

https://author.today/reader/6696/28455



А вы еще смеетесь, что я Небесный Ветерок - пониÖ

73
Maybe itís better to do lyarvovedeniye?


74
Flat Earth General / Re: The Draconids
« on: October 07, 2019, 10:08:50 AM »
If youíre so smart, answer the question and explain how meteor showers work according to your flat earth ideas.

All I ever see you do is derail threads about how things should work on a flat earth to complain about so called inconsistencies in the heliocentric model.

+

75
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Bible doesn't prove the Earth is flat.
« on: September 26, 2019, 01:30:57 PM »
The Old Testament contains evidence that ancient Hebrews had a flat earth cosmology. Christian RE tend to get mad when anyone talks about it.

Ha. The Bible says that we were brought to earth on Вайтмарах. I do not think that the pantheon of the gods would have flown to flat land. Ha ha
*I am not a Christian.

76
Flat Earth General / Re: Solar eclipse of November 23, 2003
« on: September 07, 2019, 10:37:46 AM »
To be fair no FE model can explain lunar phases.
Only one model of flat earth can explain everything, even lunar eclipses. But it is even more unusual than the black sun. This is the structure of merkaba when the sun and moon are in another dimension - relative to the earth. And they spin in an inner whirlwind coming from the center of the earth ... And their light passes at an angle to us, then the moon lowers or rises - which is why everything happens. The mathematical model works, itís only a pity that it is only mathematics, in fact, none of the official models of flat earth can explain solar eclipses. Not lunar eclipses ...

77
Flat Earth General / Re: Solar eclipse of November 23, 2003
« on: September 06, 2019, 11:18:39 AM »


Here is how the total solar eclipse is being described in the Vedic cosmology.

Now, according to the Vedic understanding, what causes the solar and lunar eclipses is a dark planet by the name of Rahu and that planet has the ability to occult or to cover the sun and the moon. Now according to this Vedic model it is completely different from our Western model. The earth is here, in the Vedic model, then the nearest planet is Rahu, then beyond Rahu there is the Sun, and beyond the sun there is the Moon. So we have like this: Earth, Rahu, Sun, Moon. So it is not actually possible, according to the Vedas, for the Moon to come in front of the Sun, because the Moon is beyond the Sun. Iím just telling you the model.

Now, according to the Vedic understanding, what happens at the time of a solar eclipse is that this planet, Rahu, comes in front of the Sun, and behind the Sun there is the Moon. So we think actually itís the Moon coming in front of the Sun whereas in reality itís Rahu, which we donít even know exists, coming in front of the Sun which causes the solar eclipse.

It could be that the Black Sun, Rahu, has a diameter which is smaller than the Sun's by some 50 meters, and an annular eclipse is caused when it orbits farthest from the Earth.

This is something which yet has to be worked out.

Now, here is another way, a very impressive argument, to prove that the Black Sun is causing the solar eclipses: Newtonium.



Modern science cannot explain the enormous temperatures of the solar corona required to justify the presence of Fe X.

When there is no solar eclipse, the Sun emits Koronium.

Only during the total solar eclipses do we also observe Newtonium.

Newtonium is the first element of Mendeleev's original periodic table of elements, the subquark.

Thule and Vril society scientists discovered that the Black Sun emits a very deep red radiation, with antigravitational properties (they called it Vril).



Group 0, line 0: NEWTONIUM

Group 0, line 1: CORONIUM


Koronium

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2057945#msg2057945

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2058259#msg2058259

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2064256#msg2064256


Newtonium

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2064764#msg2064764

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2065771#msg2065771

Listen you are sandokhan! I am Russian! I know what the Vedas are - which are real! Since I'm reading them. Stop talking nonsense here and tell everyone about the invented Vedas! You canít even imagine what is written in them! And those tales that you can read from the Internet - stop referring to them.

78
Flat Earth General / Re: Solar eclipse of November 23, 2003
« on: September 06, 2019, 11:13:02 AM »
Quote
The Black Sun is Fenrir in nordic mythology.

Sorry sandokhan ... But before you say anything about mythology, learn to read !! And do not powder here everyoneís head. I am Russian and I can tell you a lot about your failure in mythology and other things. I know the story well and say that there has never been a dome above the earth, but there was a water layer around the earth. When the moon - Lelya fell to the ground, water poured down and caused a flood. And be kind first think what you write. And you didnít tell me how the gyrocompass can work on flat earth - even theoretically!

79
Flat Earth General / Re: Solar eclipse of November 23, 2003
« on: September 06, 2019, 11:02:08 AM »
The Black Sun is Fenrir in nordic mythology.

It has the same diameter as that of the Sun.

No artistic imagery: the color of the Black Sun was not modified in any way, the author clearly describes everything, that is why I included the link from the very start.

It cannot be the Moon.

Yes, the image shows a heavenly body which is very close, geographically, from the photographer, a total confirmation of the 636 meter height, but more basically YOU, THE RE, have to explain the Allais effect.

Unless you can explain the Allais effect, I win.

Here are the calculations published by Dr. Allais, sent to Nasa (Dr. Maurice Allais, a Nobel prize winner):



Dr. Maurice Allais:

In both cases, with the experiments with the anisotropic
support and with those with the isotropic support, it is found
that the amplitudes of the periodic effects are considerably
greater than those calculated according to the law of gravitation,
whether or not completed by the theory of relativity.
In the case of the anisotropic support, the amplitude of
the luni-solar component of 24h 50m is about twenty million
times greater than the amplitude calculated by the theory of
universal gravitation.

In the case of the paraconical pendulum with isotropic
support, this relation is about a hundred million.


I already explained everything about the new Moon:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1628430#msg1628430


I could not resist and laugh. Ha ha ha Wise - you are very wise! This is the second moon Fata closes the sun ... The moon that recently fell ... Sorry - English does not convey the fullness of my thoughts, but I hope you laugh with me ...

80
Flat Earth General / Re: Does Putin know that the earth is not a globe?
« on: August 30, 2019, 09:13:43 PM »
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

And believe me, Putin - - не дурак

81
Flat Earth General / Re: Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 11, 2019, 10:57:31 AM »
Most likely I will no longer write, since I have nothing more to say here. In Voynich manuscript - written in * charomutnoy * Russian it is said the same thing as I told all the time.
But it also says that there are those who want all knowledge to be controlled by some third force, which rules the world.
I already told you more than necessary, and showed in practice all the lies of modern science. Starting from the very first posts where he said that the angle of inclination of satellite dishes is not true. The angle is several degrees different from the official one. Since the horizon is an infinite plane at every observation point on the earth globe. Those interested in the fifth dimension must understand. Now they will say that Voynich manuscript is impossible to read. Yes, it is impossible if you are not Russian! Russians read it perfectly in their ancient language. Draw conclusions gentlemen.
Waved his wing.

82
Flat Earth General / Re: Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 11, 2019, 02:30:51 AM »
Quote
Older stuff, like the pyramids, seem to be aligned to what we consider the same cardinal points we acknowledge today. Why don't they conform to your theory?


Because you do not understand what you are talking about.
So itself, as no one understood how ships with direct sails can sail against the wind. It is a swim. I'm not saying that before the flood, these ships flew !. The turbines that blew in the sails received electricity from the atmosphere. In general, on the example of maps and built temples. It can be argued that the earth is not only a globe that revolves around the sun, but also that the whole story has been rewritten. I always said that the earth is both a ball and a plane, only you donít understand how it is, because you simply donít want to understand. This branch is an example of this - I proved that the earth is a sphere and revolves around the sun, and you all shout that you do not believe the evidence. And official evidence! Which can be checked, and not disputes about formulas. In general, here is a ship that used electricity for turbines that blew into the sails. The screws under water were invented later.



The flags already show that now there is only one moon left ... Month ...

83
Flat Earth General / Re: Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 11, 2019, 01:39:20 AM »
I think that those who believe in the ball will be very pleased that all this indicates that the earth has the properties of a gyroscope, which means it rotates and the maps of the starry sky are real, so they could not be drawn on flat earth. Since from a flat earth you simply will not draw this. You need to see everything and put the sun in the middle, especially after the axis of the earth has been shifted. But the question is, who is behind the standard flat ground? After all, it is not real, if you do not take into account other dimensions. And why hide the truth about earth and space ...

84
Flat Earth General / Re: Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 11, 2019, 01:29:33 AM »
The moon never fell to the Earth, it was a Mars-sized planet. At least, that is the accepted theory. There were no people around to witness the creation of the moon 4 billion years ago.

As always, everyone thinks about a flat horizon, a starry sky that goes in different directions, and uselessly argue about guns firing from an airplane. And when you show real museum things proving that the earth is a globe ... all for some reason they do not see anything at point blank range. For it is difficult to see the truth behind many years of official deception. The map shows how the view from the earth to the starry sky changed. From flat earth it is impossible to draw without setting the sun in the middle. That's just all the globes now need to think about what caused the North Pole to change twice, and over a period of 300 years. This is the official data. And do not forget that the earth is a gyroscope, and so quickly change the angle of the axis can only from external influences!

I wonder, for those who believe in the ball, what will be better for them?

1. To agree that the earth is flat and to forget that the earth changed the pole from the fact that the moon and comet fell on it. What else is attested to in the literature of that time.

2. Or that the earth is a sphere, and admit that the history and the present state of affairs are hidden from us (are silent). That we are ruled by Koshchei (gray aliens).

You forgot one.

3. Or that the earth is a sphere.


So what is the problem actually? From these maps it is clear that the earth is a sphere. There are globes with constellations. So you announced point 3. Explain then, what are you not comfortable with the first two? Or do you not believe the official maps of the constellations? There, it is clearly indicated that the axis used to point to the constellation Dragon. And now for the polar star. And then explain how the intermediate version appeared on the maps. Moreover, dating cards with a difference of a maximum of 300 years.
And so that you do not have questions with the fake maps of the starry sky. Go to Yandex or Google maps and see how it is built (Nikolo-Ugreshsky Monastery in the Dzerzhinsky city near Moscow.) There the same churches built at different times have different orientations to the east. One older one is oriented when the axis pointed to the dragon constellation. The recently built one is already oriented along the new axis position.

 Or you say that the temples were built somewhat without compliance with the special rules for the construction of these structures. Or, nevertheless, something changed the axis of the earth's inclination in the ecliptic.
And especially answer who is hiding this incident? Which was just recently 300-400 years ago!
And yes. See how all documents are faked to hide the fall of the moon Fata! Here is the official map of the monastery and satellite photos. Buildings in reality stand as in the photo shot from above. And the documents show that the buildings are parallel! I wonder why hide it? That's why I say that 99% of all documents are fake in order to hide the fact of the fall of the moon - Fata and then comet Biel. That our level of technology is low compared to the antediluvian. And that someone does not want everyone to know that there was a nuclear war over which this moon Fata fell. You can laugh at a curious pony. But you will not be able to laugh at official documents and satellite photographs.





" class="bbc_email">

85
Flat Earth General / Re: Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 10, 2019, 08:44:09 PM »
The moon never fell to the Earth, it was a Mars-sized planet. At least, that is the accepted theory. There were no people around to witness the creation of the moon 4 billion years ago.

As always, everyone thinks about a flat horizon, a starry sky that goes in different directions, and uselessly argue about guns firing from an airplane. And when you show real museum things proving that the earth is a globe ... all for some reason they do not see anything at point blank range. For it is difficult to see the truth behind many years of official deception. The map shows how the view from the earth to the starry sky changed. From flat earth it is impossible to draw without setting the sun in the middle. That's just all the globes now need to think about what caused the North Pole to change twice, and over a period of 300 years. This is the official data. And do not forget that the earth is a gyroscope, and so quickly change the angle of the axis can only from external influences!

I wonder, for those who believe in the ball, what will be better for them?

1. To agree that the earth is flat and to forget that the earth changed the pole from the fact that the moon and comet fell on it. What else is attested to in the literature of that time.

2. Or that the earth is a sphere, and admit that the history and the present state of affairs are hidden from us (are silent). That we are ruled by Koshchei (gray aliens).

86
Flat Earth General / Star maps prove earth globe.
« on: August 10, 2019, 01:16:13 PM »
If the earth is pancake. Then these cards do not make sense. After the moon fell on the earth, the axis of the earth shifted. Since the earth is a ball and its rotation obeys the laws of the gyroscope. That precession and changed the angle of the earth's axis. This can be seen from the ancient maps of the starry sky. Before and after the moon falls to the earth ...


*****************




One can see how they drew a new view from the earth to the sky when the position of the axis changed after the moon fell. And after the fall of the chamber after 100 years - the axis of the earth now has its current position.
Flat earthlings try to refute the starry sky.

87
Flat Earth General / Re: The 'sphere-earth' conspiracy
« on: August 10, 2019, 09:06:48 AM »
The round earth conspiracy is absurd beyond comprehension. In the 1950's maybe, but in 21st century planet earth only a fool can believe such a conspiracy is possible, that's my opinion.

I mean and there is that fool that understands that people are just deceived, a space part only iceberg top. You do not represent what technologies were 300 years ago, We likely will not reach such technologies with our approach. More true to us will not give them to develop...

It is possible to look at partial information about Tartariya here.

http://shop.influx.ru/Kadykchanskij-Andrej-Malaja-jenciklopedija-bolshoj-Tartarii-tomah-Tom-p-1993.html

Only do not complain of Russian, there is no place you you will not find anything similar more.

88
Flat Earth General / Re: The 'sphere-earth' conspiracy
« on: August 10, 2019, 05:05:13 AM »
I have still problems understanding how a 'sphere earth' conspiracy could possibly work. I would like to have input from flat-earthers.

How big is that conspiracy? Even if there are only a 'few' on top of the conspiracy, some people must fake a LOT of data. All images from space, from probes, telescopes, all the astronauts, all the rocket launches etc etc. There is so much that need to be faked. Or scientific results from planet observation, galaxies, black holes -  all must be faked! That must be a lot of people!

Why haven't any of these people coming forth and told us the 'truth'? What do you think is going on? How are they kept in the conspiracy? Why don't they leave?

Also, there must be a recruitment process to get people in that conspiracy. How do you think that is working? Are they going to a physics post-doc and saying "oh by the way, all is fake. We need you to do these fakes", and the post doc is fine with that? Where can I sign up to join the conspiracy? How do you thin it all works?

And you precisely want to learn? I think that having studied how completely rewrote and destroyed all history for the last 300 years worldwide. You will understand as the plot works. Study history of Russia since 7000th year from creation of the world, and you will see who exactly is engaged in full-scale falsification. Only then do not say that you do not want more than it the nobility...

89
Well... Waved a hoof. Boats with a direct sail floating not on the rivers, and flying by air. Use the law of physics. The third law of Newton for open systems. And rockets fly under the same law... "At the heart of operation of rocket engines Ė the third law of Newton".
In other words they are helicopters.


Maybe I'm a pony, but not an idiot ... How can I confuse a helicopter with a sailboat? Or do you intend to take the topic aside?



90
There are two problems here: 1. Your English is defective; and 2. Your ideas are defective. It is not always possible to be certain with any given statement whether you are trying to say something which is complete and utter nonsense, or whether your Russian-to-English translator is taking something sensible and turning it into gibberish. But I suspect that both are true: I think you are attempting to communicate complete and utter nonsense, and your translator is transforming that into gibberish.

Well... Waved a hoof. Boats with a direct sail floating not on the rivers, and flying by air. Use the law of physics. The third law of Newton for open systems. And rockets fly under the same law... "At the heart of operation of rocket engines Ė the third law of Newton" So where I wandered from the subject? Just I give expanded information that you thought and not blindly Wikipedia trusted.
Interesting your fellow flatties face your harsh criticism.
Yet you dont have the balls to share your own views as to why the earth is flat.


Are we really going to go over all of that again? I've already told you I have no arguments. All the evidence seems to point to a round Earth and until that changes I have no arguments or "reasons" to offer. Heavenly Breeze promotes a position that I do have arguments against, so I offer them. Silk Pajamas, who, BTW, is a round-Earther, and not a flat-Earther, also promotes ideas that I can make cogent arguments against. And therein lies the difference.

Also, these two members are presenting views that have nothing whatsoever to do with the shape of the Earth. Ancient turbine-powered sailboats, I mean, whaaa? And pi being wrong as C/D? What do either of those things have to do with FET? Of course, that doesn't mean they shouldn't post. But it does mean that they are raising issues I am comfortable arguing about.

I cannot satisfy your demand for "reasons" because even if I thought your request was legitimate, I have no "reasons."

I think you're just upset because I don't fit into any of your simple categories. Flat-Earthers are "supposed" to deny science and you're angry that I don't. Again, please note that Silk Pajamas is a round-Earther who does not fit into the normal round-Earth category, since he denies much of science but believes the Earth is (roughly) a ball.

Trying to fit people into categories is a fool's errand. We're all individuals and we defy categorization. Many flat-Earthers deny science, but not all flat-Earthers deny science, and not everyone who denies science is a flat-Earther.

Well... Waved a hoof. Boats with a direct sail floating not on the rivers, and flying by air. Use the law of physics. The third law of Newton for open systems. And rockets fly under the same law... "At the heart of operation of rocket engines Ė the third law of Newton" So where I wandered from the subject? Just I give expanded information that you thought and not blindly Wikipedia trusted.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15