Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lamaface

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12]
331
Flat Earth General / Re: We'll grown by former NASA officers
« on: April 27, 2018, 10:06:58 AM »
The image at NASA Blue Marble 2007 East,  Download Full resolution (URL): is up to 3718 x 3718 pixels.

Nice pic. Even though it’s a composite it really shows the earth in all its round glory.


332
The attempts at debunking that clip are some of the worst I have read on this forum. It makes me wonder why I joined this board.

333
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 02:56:33 AM »
You canít answer your question without taking into account biomechanics and physics. You wouldnít dismiss the fact a rock has been thrown if explaining its parabolic arc into the air.

so Iíll answer with a question: why should birds have to fly if gravity doesnít exist?

Because its their nature I think!
You're absolutely right, it's indeed their nature. Evolution has made these creatures able to overcome gravity by applying an equal or greater force to it by flapping their wings up & down.

You mean God not Evolution?😁

No, I mean evolution. If you choose to believe your god made all this ... then by all means, believe away.

Sure!
Then I wonder why a tree will not become a ship or anything else by evolution 😁

By the way thanks for your answers
You're welcome.

Nothing would prevent a tree from becoming a ship through evolution, if given enough time.

334
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 02:50:42 AM »
If Gravity exists How birds can fly and easily without power motors?????
Please donít explain the birds biomechanics but explain it from the gravity point of view
Iím Waiting logic/scientific answers

You know how a fan pushes air right, it redirects it with its blades. The bird does the same thing pushing down the air so that it itself will rise.

Compare it with swimming, just in the air where you need more speed.

You have probably heard the saying in physics, that every action has an opposite and equal reaction. The bullet firing from a gun pushes just as hard on the gun firing it.

Thanks, but where is the gravity rule here? and there are many birds floating on the air without doing any action (just float)

So you want us to explain it only using gravity? Well now you are asking an unanswerable question, since gravity is not the reason they can fly. Birds uses the matter of air to go AGAINST gravity, gravity is the force they are trying to overcome by using the friction of air.

When you move your hand through the air, you can feel the air not wanting to move so easily, this provides friction which can be used to overcome gravity. The gravity is still there, it doesn't change, but the bird is overcoming it.

Then there is the whole matter of airdynamics and speed, where you create a low pressure above a wing using speed, this will then again make it easier to counteract gravity.

and adding to that: birds also use thermal updrafts to stay airborne with the least amount of effort. Warm air goes up ... bird/balloon/hangglider/whatever goes up.

335
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 02:42:44 AM »
You canít answer your question without taking into account biomechanics and physics. You wouldnít dismiss the fact a rock has been thrown if explaining its parabolic arc into the air.

so Iíll answer with a question: why should birds have to fly if gravity doesnít exist?

Because its their nature I think!
You're absolutely right, it's indeed their nature. Evolution has made these creatures able to overcome gravity by applying an equal or greater force to it by flapping their wings up & down.

You mean God not Evolution?😁

No, I mean evolution. If you choose to believe your god made all this ... then by all means, believe away.

336
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 02:41:15 AM »
If Gravity exists How birds can fly and easily without power motors?????
Please donít explain the birds biomechanics but explain it from the gravity point of view
Iím Waiting logic/scientific answers

Why do you need power motors? I'm confused. The bird's muscles acts as "power motor."

So a small muscles can defeat the Gravity? Really Iím wondering and try to understand or get answers

It's not hard to defy gravity at all. Pick up a rock ... congratulations, you did it.

337
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 02:27:45 AM »
You canít answer your question without taking into account biomechanics and physics. You wouldnít dismiss the fact a rock has been thrown if explaining its parabolic arc into the air.

so Iíll answer with a question: why should birds have to fly if gravity doesnít exist?

Because its their nature I think!
You're absolutely right, it's indeed their nature. Evolution has made these creatures able to overcome gravity by applying an equal or greater force to it by flapping their wings up & down.

338
Flat Earth Debate / Re: How birds fly and defeating the gravity
« on: April 27, 2018, 01:43:42 AM »
You can’t answer your question without taking into account biomechanics and physics. You wouldn’t dismiss the fact a rock has been thrown if explaining its parabolic arc into the air.

so I’ll answer with a question: why should birds have to fly if gravity doesn’t exist?


339
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Wind is moving or earth is moving?!
« on: April 26, 2018, 09:56:57 AM »
Both.

Earth is orbiting the sun while spinning around its own axis.

Wind is air moving from a higher-pressure area to a lower-pressure area.

Best regards

340
Hmmm. Insults by flat earthers. Have you seen any of Intikam's posts? The artist currently known as Brotherhood of the Dome? He also ckaims to be the smartest and truest person in this forum. Go figure.

Yes. He said my mother was a *****

341
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Measurements
« on: April 26, 2018, 06:09:50 AM »
I do not have to reply members have at least 1250 posts. Look at the rules in my signature for 5 seconds.  :)

Really?

342
I haven’t had an ad hominem thrown at me (yet). Then again, I’ve only recently joined this board. I am on someone’s ignore list because my avatar is a llama though ... don’t know if I have to consider that an insult or not

(Edit: spelling ffs)

343
Flat Earth Debate / Re: New journey to the Moon
« on: April 25, 2018, 11:36:23 AM »
Im not assuming, I know we went up there. Plenty of evidence for that.

Also, If you donít believe we did, why is it hard to answer your daughterís question then? Answer her the way you feel is right but give her space (pun not intended) enough to form her own thoughts about the subject.

344
Flat Earth Debate / Re: New journey to the Moon
« on: April 25, 2018, 11:12:05 AM »
there hasn’t been no real interest in the moon the last decades for reasons already stated (I’d like to stress to moon is reallly frigging far away, like more than 5k miles). Apart from jumping around and gathering moon rocks ... there’s isn’t really anything sexy to do up there.

But the last few years, interest is increasing again ... mostly because the moon would serve as an ideal platform to launch interplanetary missions from. Not only because gravity is 6 times smaller than on earth (ergo less fuel needed) but also because the moon has minerals that can be used in the fabrication of said vessels and fuel.

But don’t expect commercial ferries to the moon anytime soon. It would still costs heaps of moneys to get there, and back.

Edit: some article about the subject that you may, or may not, find interesting: https://www.thoughtco.com/how-about-return-to-the-moon-3072600

345
The Lounge / Re: Your avatar represent your character
« on: April 25, 2018, 09:36:43 AM »
Zero points? Was hoping for at least 1. Thank you nevertheless for this epic thread.

346
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Garlic bread in space
« on: April 25, 2018, 09:26:17 AM »
I'll not continue to talk about this fraud anymore.

Too bad. I wouldíve loved to discuss space garlic bread in further detail with you.

Oh well ... nothing I can do about it.

347
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Garlic bread in space
« on: April 24, 2018, 07:44:28 AM »
Really... No comments.

The video clearly shows curvature at high altitude using a non-fisheye lens. Something flat-earthers have been craving for.

Well I had a comment, but I don't think it was relevant to the discussion.

Was the garlic bread pre-cooked or were they also testing if re-entry is a valid baking method?

xkcd tried to answer this one. The object of his research was a steak however, not garlic bread.

https://what-if.xkcd.com/28/


348
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Garlic bread in space
« on: April 24, 2018, 06:39:19 AM »
Really... No comments.

The video clearly shows curvature at high altitude using a non-fisheye lens. Something flat-earthers have been craving for.

No it doesn't. Buy lens to see better.  8)

Iím sorry to bring this up but ... what exactly are you dismissing? The lens distortion or the footage not being computer generated?

Because if youíre saying that lens distortion is the reason the footage shows curvature then youíre accepting the fact that the footage is genuine.

I don't accept to discuss someone has a personality disorder of animaly. One is enough. You have been ignored.

Well, that's unfortunate. I'm terribly sorry about this.

349
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Garlic bread in space
« on: April 24, 2018, 05:39:39 AM »
Really... No comments.

The video clearly shows curvature at high altitude using a non-fisheye lens. Something flat-earthers have been craving for.

No it doesn't. Buy lens to see better.  8)

I’m sorry to bring this up but ... what exactly are you dismissing? The lens distortion or the footage itself for being computer generated?

Because if you’re saying that lens distortion is the reason the footage shows curvature then you’re accepting the fact that the footage is genuine.

350
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Garlic bread in space
« on: April 24, 2018, 02:39:56 AM »
Pertinent question: is the garlic bread flat or curved?

351
Flat Earth General / Re: Simply: why?
« on: April 23, 2018, 10:29:25 PM »
Why would the governments of the world spend trillions of dollars covering up the true shape of the Earth? Why should they feel the need to hide the fact that the Earth is flat? I haven't seen this question answered and I seriously would love to see one.

All of them are indebted their chairs to defending the dishonest lie of globism. Remember, politicians are most possiblity say lie. This is just a bit of their hudge number of lies. This may be not hard for them to do.

What happens when Iím interested in pursuing a political career (Iím not fortunately)? Do I get a FET crash course when I get elected?

352
Waves around 10s of meters are very noticeable.

For instance in 2004 a tsunami created waves up to 30m and it killed over a quarter of a million people.

Waves of 10m or more are indeed very noticeable but only when reaching a coastline where they start breaking. Even tsunamis can remain relatively undetected in the wide open sea.

Crude animation here:


But arenít we talking about people on a beach or otherwise near sea level looking at ships a few miles away?

If you are in this position and think thereís a 10m wave coming at you, my advice would be to run as fast as you can.

I, for one, would happily take your advice and run instead of trying to prove my point ... so much is true.

353
Waves around 10s of meters are very noticeable.

For instance in 2004 a tsunami created waves up to 30m and it killed over a quarter of a million people.

Waves of 10m or more are indeed very noticeable but only when reaching a coastline where they start breaking. Even tsunamis can remain relatively undetected in the wide open sea.

Crude animation here:

354
Flat Earth Debate / Re: The Origin Of The Moon
« on: April 22, 2018, 12:29:01 PM »
Well, firstly, it is still unknown if Jupiter has a solid core or not. And if so, how big it is. Secondly, there’s more to it than just being solid: density and consistency also play a role here.

355
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Validity Of Inverse Square Law Of Gravity
« on: April 22, 2018, 12:16:48 PM »
And to expand on that: without Jupiter, earth wouldíve been bombarded to shreds by space rocks of all colours and sizes. Fortunately, our big sister and her gravitational pull keeps all those rocks in check so we can live our puny little lives :3

356
Flat Earth Debate / Re: What did happen to the lost 6 hours in a year?
« on: April 22, 2018, 12:11:05 PM »
Because in a 3d space, a bunch of stars means nothing for any of planet. This is not a proof, this is not an observe. Nobody has observed this.

Oh but a bunch of stars mean everything in a 3D space. Without them, no celestial navigation in the good olí days of seafaring to begin with ...

Furthermore, stars have been used and observed to provide evidence or proof for all kinds of neato stuff: gravitational lensing of light, the age, scale and expansion rate of the universe through stellar parallax, finding exoplanets via stellar wobble, existence of black holes, etcetera etcetera etcetera. Very exiting once you delve into it. I highly recommend looking into it.

That being said, itís not even sure the 3 known spatial dimensions are the only ones. String theorists trying to unify quantum mechanics and relativity think there might be up to 11 dimensions.

I wonder how a 11D flat earth looks like?

357
Flat Earth General / Re: Translucent Moon?
« on: April 22, 2018, 04:47:34 AM »
Is the Moon Translucent?

Skimming through the forums ... I just had to add my $ 0.02:

No

358
Flat Earth Debate / Re: What did happen to the lost 6 hours in a year?
« on: April 21, 2018, 07:53:23 AM »
Keep in mind that any calendar year is an approximation.

I'm not talking about calendars.

So called modern science claims a year with a high precision as 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes and 46 seconds. They even type the seconds. I don't see any approximation. They even use the atomic clock for correct the mistakes in the range of 10^-3.

Come on. You should agree thay they have fooled you. Stop to be continue to be fooled.

But you are talking about calendars my dear.

You are trying to fit an exact amount of time (365d5h48m46s) into a an approximation of said time (a calendar).

Thatís the equivalent of putting your feet into shoes that are too big for your size and then scratching your head because they donít fit.

359
Flat Earth Debate / Re: What did happen to the lost 6 hours in a year?
« on: April 21, 2018, 07:24:46 AM »
Keep in mind that any calendar year is an approximation.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12]