Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sentinel

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 18
61
NASA is slowly but steadily exposed as the photoshop institute that has never been to outerspace !!!

[youtube][/youtube]

As if you were in a position to debate just about anything on a solar eclipse, crappy YT vids won't help you out here since you repeatedly failed to grasp even the most basic concept of it.  :-\

62
Why do hurricanes travel east to west?

Celestial gravitation.   :P

i thought FEIB do not believe in the existence of gravity, than celestrial gravity also does not exist.

or like a flattard would argue: i ask you to prove to me that this celestrial gravitation exist and what it is.
i expect a full explanation with all details.

don't you even dare to tease him, he could go on with ad hoc crap for like pages.  :P

63
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: September 04, 2017, 11:39:35 AM »
All of the bitchslapping, and yet I.i.B. is still here. You gotta give him points for being that stubborn...  :-\

64
Flat Earth General / Re: Why are here no flat earth believers on this forum?
« on: September 02, 2017, 05:17:18 AM »
Yet round earth believers post all day.
 ???
You ask, "Why are here no flat earth believers on this forum?"
Maybe all the flat earth believers are on the Flat Earth Believers forum.
  "Flat Earth Believers
   A board for debate and discussion among Flat Earth Believers."

Mind you they seem all asleep over there too.
The most recent post was sandokhan "Advanced Flat Earth Theory" on August 23, 2017, 03:37:52 AM.

Just possibly most of the Flat Earth Believers.are no longer Flat Earth Believers.

Don't you ever forget poor old Intikam, he's still posting there as well.
A bit of a bummer he won't leave the believers section these days though as he is utterly hilarious in his delusion.  :-\

65
Flat Earth General / Re: Is evidence free belief ok?
« on: September 02, 2017, 05:13:13 AM »
What's to expect from folks who recommend to wear sunglasses at night or think that fossils are nothing but a hoax anyway?  :-\

66
Flat Earth General / Re: New flat earth proof 8/31/2017
« on: September 02, 2017, 05:07:49 AM »
If someone disagrees with one of your Heliocentric non verified hypothesis it does not make them anti science they are just critical thinkers and will not believe everything they are told until their criteria for evidence has been satisfied or in other words your hypothesis has been properly verified.

"non verified hypothesis" like the most recent eclipse which was predicted correctly down to seconds and meters at all of landfall, duration and trajectory?
You're so lost in your BS it's not even funny anymore.  :-\

67
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Further/higher
« on: August 31, 2017, 04:44:27 PM »
Waves don't have a height?
Yeah....there's no such thing as wave height...he says sarcastically. 



They probs freeze over anyway near the edge of the flat earth and then start to melt from bottom up.
Or something along this line...  :P

68
Flat Earth General / Re: The Eclipse and the International Space Station
« on: August 31, 2017, 04:28:35 PM »
If you don't think this is conflicting i am truly sorry for you.

Speaking of feeling sorry: I really do that concerning the very moment you left the eclipse thread, stating you lack the intellect of grasping the proven concept of the heliocentric approach about the solar eclipse, and then you would go on spam your uneducated BS all over any thread regarding NASA, pictures from space and the moon landing.
I mean...  :-\

69
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: August 31, 2017, 04:22:30 PM »
Yes I know how the phases of the Moon work these can be verified by anyone.
Then you admit that the moon is near the sun when in its new phase instead of over Asia like you claimed.

Nice to see that we're making progress.

The Moon is nowhere near the Sun during the Solar Eclipse.
Then where was the moon?

You said that you know how the phases of the moon work and that anyone can verify it

According to the way lunar phases work, the new moon is near the sun.

Are you saying that the solar eclipse didn't happen during a new moon?

No I'm saying as is clearly illustrated by the video I provided the moon did not pass in front of the Sun.

The moon is nowhere in sight.

This is clearly illustrated by the video I provided.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

This is because as the video clearly illustrates the Black Sun Eclipses the Sun not the Moon.

Remember your claim that the moon would be visible somewhere down in asia during the eclipse? Where's the evidence for that?
If you can't provide that evidence you're a proved liar, simple as that.  :-\

Incorrect.

Lack of evidence does not prove guilt.

Evidence proves guilt REtard.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

And still you've got no evidence for your baseless claim, so yo were either lying or outright dumb.
What should it be, I.i.B.?  :-\

70
Flat Earth General / Re: NASA fake.
« on: August 31, 2017, 04:16:24 PM »
To even think he has almost 10000 posts yet...  :-\

71
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: August 31, 2017, 10:11:17 AM »
Yes I know how the phases of the Moon work these can be verified by anyone.
Then you admit that the moon is near the sun when in its new phase instead of over Asia like you claimed.

Nice to see that we're making progress.

The Moon is nowhere near the Sun during the Solar Eclipse.
Then where was the moon?

You said that you know how the phases of the moon work and that anyone can verify it

According to the way lunar phases work, the new moon is near the sun.

Are you saying that the solar eclipse didn't happen during a new moon?

No I'm saying as is clearly illustrated by the video I provided the moon did not pass in front of the Sun.

The moon is nowhere in sight.

This is clearly illustrated by the video I provided.

Your Strange Heliocentric Religion is False.

This is because as the video clearly illustrates the Black Sun Eclipses the Sun not the Moon.

Remember your claim that the moon would be visible somewhere down in asia during the eclipse? Where's the evidence for that?
If you can't provide that evidence you're a proved liar, simple as that.  :-\

72
The existence of Australia has also been denied. ;D

As if that came to anyones surprise.  ;)

73
Flat Earth General / Re: The Eclipse and the International Space Station
« on: August 31, 2017, 10:05:33 AM »
1 I do not believe there is a spacestation orbiting earth at 27.600 km per hour.

Why do you not believe this?
To many anomalies present,....from the way it was constructed (floating through space with 27.600 km/h montage of the induvidual parts over a considerable timespan.)
The onboard footage with a guitar hero, idiotic perm hair, augmented reality with bluescreen technologies and above all.....
the ''Bob the builder'' nonsense in outer space with astronauts tightening screws for hours and other ''repair'' jobs that needs them to risk their lives ''outside''.
The underwater facilities with camera skuba divers and an exact replica of the ISS for ''practice'' usage ::)

I really cannot belive anyone buys into this fake reality....i find it quite amusing ;D

P.S. i saw a replica compartment of the ISS in an ESA space expo and it strongly confirmed my bias.

So, no substantiated reasons then? It just doesn't 'look right' to you. Is that a fair summary of your viewpoint?

Def sounds like dutchy, so yeah. Such crap is his usual arc in here.  :-\

74
yeah, there are lots of angry globularists who come here and pretend we're the ones pushing our beliefs on other people. lol

In like recommending to watch the "hazardous rays" of the Moon with sunglasses only? At night? As a dead serious suggestion by the most noteable members of this very board to the "true believers" out there?
And you guys still wonder why those pesky angry globularists bother to come here and have a good laugh?  :P

75
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: August 30, 2017, 08:50:08 AM »
As if we didn't see this thread failing completely from like 3000 miles ahead, it's almost like that denpressure trainwreck all over again.
Poor I.i.B., he put so much effort in here though.  :-\

76
Flat Earth General / Re: The Eclipse and the International Space Station
« on: August 29, 2017, 03:13:57 PM »
All a matter of opinion.
I personally find it beyond fascinating that people in 2017 actually believe something can 'orbit/fall around an imaginary curve' of a celestial body that in itself changes direction and speed if you add all the involved galactic movements in the cosmological model.

In order to understand this fantasy, one must study 'orbital mechanics'.
A freemason under a tree centuries ago hallucinating about a bullit with just enough speed and height for the ideal mixture to orbit earth.

Do people really believe this is more than science fiction,...... and i mean the real obvious trash ??

Well.
Since you still failed to grasp a concept as simple as a solar eclipse in 2017 despite being exposed to the explanations like sledgehammers to your stubborn forehead ad nauseam I'm pretty sure most folks won't give a single shit about what you find fascinating and stuff.
So why should we even respond to your pathetic BS, you repeatedly failed to prove yourself worthy on any serious debate anyway?  :-\

77
Flat Earth General / Re: I have a question i find interesting
« on: August 29, 2017, 11:08:58 AM »
The reason I mentioned it is I have now talked to 4 people IRL who have told me that the moon's phases are caused by the earth's shadow lol. Normal people, not flat earthers or even conspiracy theorists. I'm starting to think most people are just clueless idiots when it comes to some things...

As a suggestion: Try to hide the big fat "FLATTARD" sign on your forehead when you try to talk to people to avoid the dumb ones.   :)

78
Flat Earth General / Re: The Eclipse and the International Space Station
« on: August 29, 2017, 10:33:27 AM »
Why you guys respond to hoppy is beyond me anyway, poor ha is considered to be a sad joke even by the mods around here.  :-\

it is fun with what explanations he come up some times. he is a great source of laughter.

I happen to find the likes of jroa better though, his desperate ad hoc BS is actually hilarious most of the time.
hoppy on the other hand has obviously no clue what so ever in both physics and mechanics, just a sad and delusional flat-troll who never made it out the basement of his parent home.

79
Flat Earth General / Re: The Eclipse and the International Space Station
« on: August 29, 2017, 10:10:44 AM »
Why you guys respond to hoppy is beyond me anyway, poor ha is considered to be a sad joke even by the mods around here.  :-\

80
Autistic shills can keep saying 1+0=2 until they're blue in the face...
I know he's gone for now, but

It's pitiful when the real ignoramuses among us like jroa and Papa Legba use the term Autistic to imply dim-witted,
when many with ASD, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, are the real savants.

And while someone with ASD might know that 1 + 0 = 1, they might also seriously claim that 1 + 1 = 10  and 7 x 7 = 61.
Then think you a bit dim-witted when you don't see those as obvious.
What I find sickening is the use of terms like "autistic" and "spastic" used as insults. It just shows up the mentality of those like Papa Legba who do this.
:P May I now get down off my soap box.  :P

Things like 7 x 7 = 61 turned up a bit when looking at machine language on the old GE-225, designed by Arnold Spielberg (father of Steven Spielberg) and and Chuck Prosper.

He hasn't been back since I reported him to the moderator for posting a link to the home address of a participant. Did you see that? It was up for maybe an hour. I reported it to the moderator, and then that post went down. He's been quiet since. Do people get banned?
that was at least the fourth post of his doing that.  it seems people only get banned temporarily here.

Such severe violation of privacy should result in a perma if you ask me. Pretty much all the other boards I've been active so far would do that as it is an absolute no go, but here he got only 2 weeks as far as I know...  ::)

81
Just wonder if and when the mere thousands of wheater ballons, started by a mere thousands of flattards on eclipse day, are actually beginning to debunk the poor globe as promised.
So far there's absolutely nothing of note, not even by our beloved and respected I.i.B...  :-\

82
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: August 27, 2017, 12:11:46 PM »
The Globe has been debunked end of.

If that actually did happen it def wasn't in this thread, so far you completely failed to reach your goal in here.
But yeah, just go on rambling about tape measures and whatnot...  :-\

83
The disk is infinite. Fuel is finite.

Wait.. I thought there was a great ice wall barrier.  Being as though I am in New Zealand, I should be close enough to the edge to just hop a plane and get some great footage of this "Game of Thrones" thing.

Take the utmost care though, the Night King now has a air force.

84
Flat Earth General / Re: Eclipse 21.08.17 will debunk the Globe
« on: August 27, 2017, 11:04:31 AM »
So is this thread still about I.i.B. desperately trying to debunk the Globe by the most recent eclipse?
As of now the only evidence in here is about his ability of moving goalposts, why the hell are we discussing tape measures now?  :-\

85
Flat Earth General / Re: Laser tests prove the Earth is flat.
« on: August 27, 2017, 07:24:54 AM »
No curvature in 17 miles:


Again:
https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Why those guys never take the viewers height into account, so the hidden height would be 135 feet without and 113 feet with standard refraction? And I'm not even beginning to talk about the obvious miraging and heavy refraction going on here, you could clearly see a second water horizon with the waves behind the first one.
Sorry, but this proves nothing.  ::)

Well, at 17 miles, the RE curvature would be 193 feet or 59 meters. Suppose your figures are correct (standard refraction?  ;D ;D ;D ) so 193-135=58 ft or 18 meters. Still quite a lot. If Earth were round, they should not have seen lower parts of the structure.

Did you even use that calculator once? Viewers height still is very important for the hidden height, and as the video OP claims the camera was 5 feet above sea level it actually was 135 feet hidden without standard refraction and not the 193 feet as claimed.
Get your facts straight for once, geez...  ::)

86
Flat Earth General / Re: Laser tests prove the Earth is flat.
« on: August 27, 2017, 05:21:30 AM »
No curvature in 17 miles:


Again:
https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Why those guys never take the viewers height into account, so the hidden height would be 135 feet without and 113 feet with standard refraction? And I'm not even beginning to talk about the obvious miraging and heavy refraction going on here, you could clearly see a second water horizon with the waves behind the first one.
Sorry, but this proves nothing.  ::)

87
It still remains a very dangerous journey, and for sure I wouldn't want to be among the "early adopters" when space tourism becomes a thing in the future.
Maybe in some years time when it's something like a standard procedure like boarding a plane (that said if it would become common at all), still I wouldn't hold it against anyone saying she/he doesn't want to go because of safety issues and/or the furios forces acting on your body at lift off and reenter the atmosphere.

But yeah, as for the notion of the ultimate proof: Someone of them should do it and see it with their own eyes and then be done with once and for all.
If I had the money I take that trip in a heart beat...early adopter or not.

Mike

I knew you would say something like that.  ;D

88
The genuine people who can think, need to sit down and think hard on this.
No, most already have. If you can think you should sit down and think hard on it, not this crap you have come up with.
He lives in another reality where our physics don't apply. I don't know how he communicates with this world but its abolutely useless do argue with him about space or vacuum or something else.

Try the utter trainwreck that was Denpressure theory, he would love that I assume.

89
The Lounge / Re: M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL!
« on: August 24, 2017, 10:24:06 AM »
Tom Bishop on the "Other Board That Must Not Be Named":

Quote
The distance from New York to Paris is unknown.

90
It still remains a very dangerous journey, and for sure I wouldn't want to be among the "early adopters" when space tourism becomes a thing in the future.
Maybe in some years time when it's something like a standard procedure like boarding a plane (that said if it would become common at all), still I wouldn't hold it against anyone saying she/he doesn't want to go because of safety issues and/or the furios forces acting on your body at lift off and reenter the atmosphere.

But yeah, as for the notion of the ultimate proof: Someone of them should do it and see it with their own eyes and then be done with once and for all.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 18