Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - disputeone

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 392
32
The Lounge / Re: what's up with Crutonius and Qanon?
« on: July 25, 2018, 01:17:04 AM »
Inb4 thread is deleted and I am banned again.

33
The Lounge / what's up with Crutonius and Qanon?
« on: July 25, 2018, 01:16:26 AM »
Why was I banned for your distaste of a rouge intelligence asset. It's not my fault you are getting defectors from the intelligence community.

It's your fault.


34
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Another mass shooting...
« on: July 23, 2018, 10:44:55 PM »

There is only one true King.

Per kingdom at any given time.

Edgy.

There really is only one King and one Kingdom. The rest are mere titles given of and from men.

35
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: God?
« on: July 23, 2018, 10:43:16 PM »
0+0=0 every single time.

When you can prove 0+0=1 I will retract my claim that a creator is needed for creation.

36
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: FE moderators needed
« on: July 23, 2018, 10:19:11 PM »
Intikam and Sandokhan should be mods if you wish to continue the charade of this being an actual FE forum.

Otherwise it's just obvious it's a psyop.

Crutonius becomes a mod then immediately starts pushing for an Intelligence Agency coup against an elected government.

You're not fooling anyone five eyes lmao.

37
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: FE moderators needed
« on: July 23, 2018, 10:16:47 PM »
Critic is the easiest job ever.
It takes no skill. No credentials required.
All one needs is an opinion.

Must be why you are so skilled at it.

Sandokhans right this site is nothing but a psyop run by five eyes spooks who believe the earth is a globe.

Hi frens.

38
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Consent
« on: July 23, 2018, 08:52:23 PM »
Srs question for the bleeding hearts here. (Duck)

I was woken up in a very pleasant way by a very nice girl on the weekend. I was asleep so I obviously couldn't consent in the strictest sense.

Was I raped?
Srlsy???

If I reported this as a rape would I be taken seriously or laughed out the door?

39
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Consent
« on: July 23, 2018, 08:47:07 PM »
Oh Duck there are hundreds of examples of a male being done for rape when both parties are equally inebriated. Come on now.

It isn't equality. It puts far more responsibility on the male in the encounter.

It's feminism.

40
Thanks man. i was really cut up about Bhs so I didn't know if I'd come back.

Anyway look morty I turned myself into a prison bitch.

PRISON BITCH RICK!!!



41
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Another mass shooting...
« on: July 23, 2018, 07:53:33 PM »
Quote
:191 And kill them wherever you find them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing

Fight them until there is no [more] fitnah [disbelief] and worship is for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors.

...

Quote
21Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: 22But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. 23Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee; 24Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.

There is only one true King.

42
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Another mass shooting...
« on: July 23, 2018, 07:48:54 PM »


Faisal Hussain

43
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Consent
« on: July 23, 2018, 06:59:02 PM »
You out there banging lots of chicks? lol
Nope, not what I meant. I meant from conversations I have with people. I'm still a sad virgin  :(

You denied it when I called you out on it. Stop being a soyboy beta male.

PM me and we'll talk. I was raised by a single mother too.

44
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Consent
« on: July 23, 2018, 06:54:47 PM »
Or so the news would have me believe.

Lol, quite easily too they just tell you and you believe it word for word.

Were you one of the 5k viewers of Anderson (CIA spook) cooper.

No wonder you guys are losing the information war. Your main propaganda mouthpiece who started his career in the CIA only gets 5k viewers on a live stream.
Why do you hate honest youtubers pulling millions of views per video again?

Lol never mind.

Hi frens. :).

45
Good, hunting pedos, exposing corruption, f*cking up your sh*t for teh lulz.

You know what it's like.

Two in two days hopefully. I like being able to rally the communists to our cause.

46
This aged rather well.

I'd say we're well and truly winning.

MSM = 0
Hollywood = 0
Internet = 1

Toodle pip pedo shills.

47
Why not bomb Israel for using white phosphorous?

http://www.clevelandchallenger.com/u-s-media-suppressed-2009-un-report-showing-israel-using-chemical-weapons-against-palestinians/

Quote
This Palestinian teenager is one of the victims of the Israeli military’s illegal white phosphorous missile attacks on unarmed civilians, including a UN relief compound set up to shelter and provide medical attention to Palestinian refugees. Israel’s military conducted its own investigation of the incidents, apologized for the attack and called it a “grave error.” A UN fact finding mission overseen by South African lawyer and former justice Richard Goldstone called the use of white phosphorous a “war crime.”

Edit.

Meanwhile, Evar is like.


48
So, what does this have to do with why chemical weapons are a red line?

That the US and Israel have made an imaginary red line in order to start another war for the petro-dollar and IMF.

Intikam is correct.

USA and its allies are using chemical weapons in Afghanistan, Yemen, Somali and other nations at every day and night.

49
You're desperately creating a strawman. I don't think the US should play world police at all.

That's merely the reason they want a war. It's far more comfortable to believe that Assad gasses kids for teh lulz and America wants to save them than to believe we would start a world war to protect the petrodollar and IMF. Just like it was far more comfortable to believe Saddam had WMDs.

The use of chemical weapons was a false flag to start another bankers war.

The US can do whatever they like because they have the strongest military currently. The strong take what they will and the weak are powerless to stop them.

I am not arguing the morality of the situation. Merely the reality.

50
My point is the thread topic.

"Why are chemical weapons a red line."
So, your point is that if chemical weapons should be a red line, the US are allowed to bomb anyone who breaks the law?

That the US and Israel want a war in Syria for far different reasons than they publicly state or admit.

Mainly this.

http://www.hangthebankers.com/china-russia-iran-gold-backed-currency/

Where will a war in Syria lead, to a war with China, Russia and Iran.

I am sure this is pure coincidence.

Right?

Because of the holocaust.



NAZIs has created the NASA. So; In the aim of fight against chemical weapons, we should start it with closing or destroying the NASA, the master mind of the chemical attacks. I call the Kremlin to take precaution about the new center of the NAZI's !

Correct. The CIA and NASA were heavily influenced and controlled by members of the NSDAP.

51
My point is the thread topic.

"Why are chemical weapons a red line."



Your reasons seem to have fallen apart.

52
To gain an advantage in war. Either the US backed syrian rebels who have every reason in the world to use chemical weapons or Assad who had absolutely no reason and no incentive to use chemical weapons.
And this is exactly what the US goverment have stated are their reason for bombing syria?

No they are lying like they lied about Saddams WMD's

Enemy troops.

You're pretty much a pretzel at this point.
Only enemy troops?

Both killed civilians.

The Brittish also had """collateral damage""" caused by chemical weapons and openly targetted civilians specifically in bombing raids.

Why dont you just claim its ok when we do it?

You're embarrassing yourself and I am starting to feel bad.

53
Britain used chemical weapons in war.

Syria used chemical weapons in war.

This is just too much fun.
Ok. Can you elaborate? How where they used,

To gain an advantage in war.

Either the US backed syrian rebels who have every reason in the world to use chemical weapons or Assad who had absolutely no reason and no incentive to use chemical weapons.

who were the targets?

Enemy troops.

You're pretty much a pretzel at this point.

54
Britain used chemical weapons in war.

Syria used chemical weapons in war.

This is just too much fun.

55
Same reaon they want to bomb Syria.
Can you put this reason in your own words?

Yes, here.

Using chemical weapons.

Using chemical weapons.
If it's ONLY, and for no other reason, because they use or have used chemical weapons, I see no reason to bomb anyone. Depending on HOW the chemical weapons are used, that may change. Just like how ANY weapon is used will decide what is an appropriate response.

That's the mental gymnastics I was looking for.

I'm satisfied.

Goodnight mate.

56
Same reson they want to and have already bombed Syria.

Using chemical weapons.

With no proof as to who was responsible.

57
Should America bomb Britain then?

58
It's horrible when facts ruin a narrative you are emotionally comfortable with hey?


59
I really hope they don't kill him. It's always the idealists they have to kill because they can't be bought.

God-bless you Tucker.
You keep getting more and more gullible and pretentious. Tucker is already bought, ffs...

That girl you think you need won't show you affection no matter how much you mirror her political views and agree with everything she says.

We've all been young.

I'm assuming you are claiming he's been bought by the Russians.

Seeing he is the only media representative who isn't following the approved script.

Obviously he's the one that's been bought, not everyone else.

60
For teh lulz.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 392