I suggest before you begin your ad hominem attacks you might try READING CAREFULLY before replying. My post started with "Satellites exist as DO high altitude balloons" not "to high altitude balloons". Those two statements mean differing things.
The existence of satellites is of no more import to the Flat Earth Theory than the moving of celestial objects. Once a satellite is launched via a delivery system through the atmosphere it encounters aether, or more precisely the ethereal wind (see Isaac Newton- one of the "rounder's favorites). The aetherial wind moves in a rotational manner (see my post on Coriolis Effect Exists But Not In The Way Rounders Think it Does).
I could start a thread, I suppose that was entitled "Satellites about the earth- But Not The Way Rounders Think They Do"
As the Aether rushes by the earth objects that it intersects with are also pulled along the path taking them around the disc. We also have to remember that the disc (or earth) is also moving upward (along with the aether and the atmosphere) at a constant acceleration of 32/f/s/s. The objects (in this case satellites) that interact with the ethereal wind then travel lower, but along the edge of the Aetheric "whirl pool). The satellites experience the same "eye wash" effect as the sun and the moon- but with light reflected by such and with such low luminosity (compared to those latter two objects) that the "satellite Rise and Setting are not as noticeable.
It seems to me that many "rounders" are a bit touchy - when we explain our theories the posts seem to be extremely emotional and almost paranoid. I certainly can understand that - my own view is that people who explode and enter into name calling are probably beginning to realize the pack of lies about the universe and the construction of such that they have been fed. It is understandable that such a reaction would result in emotional responses like this one. It must be difficult when one finally begins glimpsing the TRUTH through the "veil of lies"
We "explode" because you have the gall to call our greatest achievements a "veil of lies," insult the integrity and intelligence of the people who accomplish them, and when you're faced with a real challenge to your own theory, you hide behind "aether," "celestial gravitation," and more bullshit. Your "theory" has
no self-consistency at all, and is really nothing more than vain, uninformed speculation.
Did you not see my list of other satellite orbits? Take polar orbits for example. If they were travelling over a flat earth, they would have to teleport to the other end, every single orbit. Now take Molniya orbits. They are highly elliptical, semi-synchronous orbits. They keep the satellite over a given area for a longer period. Geostationary orbits are motionless over the equator, and geosynchronous orbits follow analemmas relative to the surface. Each of these orbits is carefully chosen for the purpose at hand, and their altitude and velocity can be verified via parallax. Do you seriously think that they would rely on some "aetheric whirlpool" bullshit? Of course not! Their paths can only be explained by a spherical earth and gravity.
Furthermore, it is you doing the ad hominem attacks and straw men attacks, specifically on Newton. Newton had no way to know about the nature of gravity. We just credit him for the notion of gravity, and the laws of motion. He's not a god, and we don't care about his personal life or opinions.
Also, fuck you for calling NASA a "veil of lies," and fuck you in general.
Show Posts
I think it was a "Godly gift" or something other. Can you see the winner?. 
