1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: One of Toms posts, and the 100 proofs thing
« on: November 28, 2008, 06:34:23 AM »... you can't just claim something and "assume true" without any further evidence...
Indeed. FET fails miserably on that account.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
... you can't just claim something and "assume true" without any further evidence...
...going to live with a friend.
QuoteIt is observed consistently, even through telescopes
Proof?
REers on the Sun:It's is a Yellow dwarf.
The interaction of the Sun and Moon's magnetic fields at close range causes them to repel one another.
I didn't realize that the moon had a magnetic field. Do you have any verifiable evidence to support that claim?
It seems that magnetic repulsion should affect the sun's and/or moon's orbit as well. Any thoughts as to why this is not observed?
So if bendy light is merely a derivative theory, what observational basis does that theory have? Obviously it can't be "the Earth looks flat", because bendy light negates that observation. It would appear that your new derivative theory is entirely beyond human experience. I guess the new basis for Bendy Light FET is "We'd like to believe that the Earth is flat."
Before you continue to use my own logic to disprove FET, let's change the subject shall we?
On the topic of the electromagnetic accelerator, it's all well and good as a possible explanation for bendy light... but that doesn't change the fact that bendy light itself is inconsistent with the very foundations of FET.
I'll try to put it as simply as possible:
- It is possible to observe the roundness of Earth. (sinking ship effect)
- FET explains observations of roundness with bendy light.
- Bendy light also nullifies observations of flatness.
- FET is based on the observation of a flat Earth.
- Therefore bendy light invalidates FET.
I believe we can consider FET to have been successfully disproved by its own advocates. Bravo!
No, bendy light is a derivative of the original FET. We do not yet know which is correct. I saw the need for a modification to FET, and came up with the bendy light hypothesis. It may be wrong, but you can't say that the scientists who came up with the idea of the luminiferous aether disproved the existence of light.
Considering that a shuttle is visible right up to (and possibly beyond) LEO, there's no doubt that it goes up and stays up there. You could probably send it down during the the middle of the day or night, but you'll have the get it back up at most about 40 minutes after you took it down lest various shuttle spotters notice it's missing. There may be various times when you'll have to keep it up anyway as it may be visible during the day or night.
NASA projects holograms into the atmoplane. They don't need to be very high resolution; they just need to be sufficient to keep people from wondering where the shuttle went.
- Religion should not exist.
- All ethnic groups are equal.
- All cultures are equal.
- We are all citizens of the world.
- No one should have a say about our lifestyles.
- Men and women are different, but equal.
- Nature is an asset we must manage carefully.
- Success is making a living doing what you love.
- We should reward businesses that serve Society.
- Quality of life is more important than work.
- Everyone should have the opportunity to receive a great education.
- Everyone should receive the same quality health care.
- Financial security should first be an individual responsibility.
- Charity is more an individual responsibility than a collective responsibility.
- Security is a primary a collective responsibility.
- We should reduce the causes of crime.
*shows lack of knowledge*
What are pings anyway?
Bendy light. You assume that earth is flat and therefore come up with BL as a solution. OK, that is a theory, but in science you need to be able to test and retest to validate a theory. Right now you appear to be saying here is a theory of bendy light which proves flat earth can work. We can prove the theory because the Earth is flat! Running round in circles there mate.Circular logic, quite ironically.
What is also ironic is the way you mention the dark ages and the way they believed in witches. You know what else they believed in the dark ages? That the world was flat.
What would be hilarious is to take one of these morons on a trip on a space shuttle and watch them furrow their brows as they finally realise that the world is round. Actually, all you'd need to do is put them on a sailing ship and travel in a straight line long enough before they'd get to the same place. And no-one has made mention of being in a plane and _seeing_ the curvature of the earth with their own eyes. Or are planes part of the NASA god conspiracy as well.
Jesus christ, I can't believe there are people still this stupid in the civilised world :/
*smacks head* I get it now! Ast Onok is a moron! I kinda suspected.
If you want new trolls to come to this forum you need to nurture and protect them.
It's the southern hemisphere travel times argument again folks.
Moon squirter - did you miss the subtle undertone of sarcasm in my post?
OppsMust save that Occam rant for another time.