Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
[...] is the flat earth theory really debunked now???
Here's the 'launch sequence' from the low-budget sci-fi film 'Europa Report'; it's just as convincing as your 'Delta Heavy' bullshit but didn't cost the taxpayer $billions:
The entire Earth should be bathed from a 850,000 mile diameter so called sun, not just a frigging spotlight reflection.That supposed real Earth from the distant satellite shows a central spotlight effect. Why?I don't know exactly what picture you refer to, but.
Has the supposed 93 million mile sun suddenly decided to concentrate all of it's light onto a small area?
You might have heard that water (the Pacific Ocean) does reflect light, there'll be a bit of specular reflection even with waves!
And the earth is a globe not a flat surface, so the central region will be brighter even from that.
The whole thing is a silly mock up and there's no hiding from that fact.
Look out your window.
Not all bonds are created equally....some have more energy than others, hence why some reactions release energy in the end, like the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen to form water...and release energy in the form of heat and light.Covalent bonds are the same thing. Electrons don't change properties.
So let's just ignore bond energy I suppose? Pretend that any and all bonds contain the same amount of energy, while ignoring all chemistry that indicates otherwise?
Please tell me where the extra energy in identical forms of bonds would come from.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-36587252He likely doesn't know he's been duped, or is simply mistaken.
Its pretty inherent in flat earth conspiracy theory. For example, the logo of the UN is the standard flat earth map as well as the logo for several other international organizations like the WHO. The UN hall of assembly also suspiciously looks like a dome hung with stars, another common flat earth depiction. It was worked on by Le Corbusier, a known occultist (and a great architect / thinker). The ISS is an international space station, and there is a wealth of evidence that space travel is a hoax.
That's been answered a bunch of times. It very well could be an international conspiracy. A good deal of those organizations piggy back on the US space efforts too. I'd do a search.
And if you think that, as ESA suggests, the drag is 4-5g during 200 seconds, you must show that a human can survive it.
The moon reflector fallacy is one of the biggest that RE'ers throw around in their desperation to prove that the moon landings were real.
1. We have supposedly been bouncing lasers off the moon since the early 50s, nearly a decade before NASA supposedly put a retroreflector on the moon.
2. You people make it out that anyone can perform this experiment. The reality is that there are not very many entities who have a laser powerful enough or receivers sensitive enough to perform this experiment.
The ones that do are funded by the government, so you have to trust that the government would never lie in order to fully trust in these experiments.
3. The waiting list to have them shoot a laser at the moon for you is years long and very expensive.
4. It is claimed that when they shine the laser at the moon, they get back just a few of the photons that they send. You have to just take their word for it that these few photons are even the same ones they shot out of their laser.
5. Even if you managed to get them to shine their laser at the moon for you, it takes weeks or months to get the data for the experiment back. Why does it take so long to process this little bit of data from the few photons they receive back?
6. Does this smell a little fishy to you yet?
surviving 4-5g acceleration is not hard, especially because it is performed face-first.
Fighter pilots have to endure up to 10g acceleration downwards, which is way, way harder.
Hm! Face first? Better back first facing aft! But 4-5g during 3-4 minutes will send the content of your stomach ... into space.
Tim Peake, Tim Kopra and Yuri Malechenko are returning to earth from the ISS this morning.
Link.
According to the ESA link the speed is 28 800 km/h or 8 000 m/s, when re-entry starts at 120 000 m altitude (top of atmosphere) and the deceleration is pretty constant 4-5 g say about 40 m/sē. LOL!
Braking through atmosphere to about zero speed and parachute deployment will thus take exactly 200 seconds and during that short time the length of the trajectory is 800 000 m. Imagine being subject to 4 g for 3 minutes and 20 seconds. Should'nt you be squeezed flat? The Soyuz capsule outside manages to be protected by a heat shield that gets 1600°C temperature during the deceleration. It is all fantasy of course and does not win my Challenge.
NASA never admits its lies, they just make the lie an industry standard. For example, if NASA says that they have a satellite in polar orbit, then everyone believes that they have a satellite in polar orbit. No need to prove this claim or anything, it just becomes "true."
Do you have any evidence that when NASA says they have a satellite in polar orbit, they don't?
Are you asking me to prove a negative? Come back when you've had a course in logic.
You're asking for times when a well funded agency admitted to lying?
Or
When authorities admitted NASA lied?
There are two press conferences you might want to look at, the apollo11 press conference where they seem like they just got buttfucked,rather than returning from the most amazing mission never.
And the mars Rover press conference where the Elvis haired lead engineer can't answer any of the crowds questions
Quite often on these boards it's asserted or implicated that NASA tells lies.
Does anyone have any specific, concrete examples of NASA lying? By this I mean examples either of NASA admitting to falsehood, or of there being generally and authoritatively accepted evidence that contradicts what NASA has said.
I'm not asking for conspiracy theory kind of stuff, or people's opinions. Just proper evidence. Ideally there would be citations, both for what NASA has claimed and also for the contradiction.
NASA never admits its lies, they just make the lie an industry standard. For example, if NASA says that they have a satellite in polar orbit, then everyone believes that they have a satellite in polar orbit. No need to prove this claim or anything, it just becomes "true."
Quite often on these boards it's asserted or implicated that NASA tells lies.
Does anyone have any specific, concrete examples of NASA lying? By this I mean examples either of NASA admitting to falsehood, or of there being generally and authoritatively accepted evidence that contradicts what NASA has said.
I'm not asking for conspiracy theory kind of stuff, or people's opinions. Just proper evidence. Ideally there would be citations, both for what NASA has claimed and also for the contradiction.
You must be joking.
You're being contradictory
If people can take pictures of geosynchronous satellites with a camera and zoom lens then why no satellite pictures.
You guys are so brainwashed. It is so funny think you guys fall for these fake videos, hook line and sinker.
It's just reversed footage of a rocket taking off.
I'm willing to budge on this point and say its a valid argument that I'm assuming the Earth is flat.
The second Challenge 2 (topic) is about human space travel. NASA & Co say it is possible and easy and has been done but when checking their info - trajectories, fuel consumed, hard- and software used 1969, etc, etc, it is quite easy to find and conclude they are also faked. All false. So I am also qualified to judge it.
IMO opinion my Challenge is impossible! Why? Human space travel is not possible.
