Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Water is dry, but anything it touches, it wets. Wet is the application of water.
If you're after a challenge, globetard, answer this:
How many holes does a drinking straw have?
According to the bible, god killed approximately 2.8 Million people and satan/the devil killed 2In fairness that's at least partly because the book's about God. In Harry Potter, Harry killed one person while Hitler killed no one, so Harry Potter's worse than Hitler.
If Satan published his biography I'm sure there'll be plenty in there that didn't make it into the Bible.
The roots of globularism trace to the Pythagorean number cult. They believed the earth, like the counter-earth and other objects in the heavens, was a sphere as the sphere was their perfect shape.
I see all the thrust coming out of the rocket against the?....atmosphere. It can't be against nothing.....unless you can show me internally in that rocket where the opposite reaction is to the action from that nozzle.Don't make out I know nothing about rocket engines while pretending that you do.As long as you claim things like "rockets can not work in extreme low pressure" I'll claim that you "know nothing about rocket engines".
I only need to know one thing.
That one thing is as clear as can be.
Rockets can not work in extreme low pressure, never mind fictional space.l
Get me Steve!
Here from someonethat knows far more about calculating the thrust of a rocket engine that you ever will:
How do you like them apples?
Look at the (pe - po)Ae term where:
pe is the exhaust pressure at the end of the bell,
po is the outside pressure and
Ae is the area of the exit from the bell.
From that, it is obvious that the thrust is highest in a near vacuum where po approaches zero.
Oops, I forgot that you don't believe in sums so forget all that.
But if you are not prepared to do a few sums it is obvious that you "know nothing about rocket engines".
End of story!
Come on...once and for all show me. Let's see you point to the places where this reaction to action takes place.
Show me where this push occurs to make that rocket go high into the sky without using the atmosphere as a resistance, externally.
Earth magically blocks the ua.
All objects in the earths shaodw feel the ua indirectly.
Requiring the edge of earth to be indestructable from the shear force.
That explains earth quakes. The earth is fracturing under the force, and one day will break into a million pieces.
You want us to prove a negative?Are you trying your hardest to appear clever?
Is the ISS up there, or is it not?
There's something flying around up there. I've seen it pass over once. I don't know what it is.
No, drone. There is one watching through your window RIGHT NOW. But when you look, it darts slightly out of view.
"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants."
Wait, did someone say China flattened the Earth and removed one of the poles?
So why should we be expected to be scientists?It's just as well then that flat-earthers aren't:
- Designing aircraft.
- Designing automobiles.
- Designing large buildings.
- Designing large bridges.
- Planning and directing the construction is long tunnels.
- Planning and navigating international flights.
The Wright Brothers were Zetetists.
"Science theory held us up for years. When we threw out all science, started from experiment and experience, then we invented the airplane." -- The Wright Brothers (source)
In fact, most inventions and pharmaceuticals were created from experiment to experience.
There is a life definition of life according to Father of humanbeings, Adam.
After Kabyl killed the Habyl, after Adam has learned, says its to Eva:
"Habyl is dead".
Eva asks:
"What is dying?"
Adam replies:
"He is not eating, not talking, *not breathing anymore" (I'm not sure if maybe walking, may be breathing)
Then Eva cries.
This is meanwhile the first crying of human beings. Inother say, after Habyl dies, Adam was not cried, but after his mother has learned, she has cried.
There is a preverb in Turkey: "if one cries, only his/her mother feels his/her pain truly".
Anyways.
According to these definition, life is at least
a) eating
b) talking
c) breathening
If one of these exists, so there is a life here. If any of them are not exist so no life.
But I'm not sure of breath. I've searched for source but could not found. It has to be somewhere in any religinal texts.
I would quietly back out of the cellphone GPS argument.I invite flat earther to explain how air Force personnel are able to pilot drones from across an ocean. Or how cruise missiles find their targets.
If you have network coverage your phone can work out it's position using AGPS. No need for satellites.
How your actual GPS device can give you a position (including altitude) outside range of cell reception is more of a challenge to satellite non believers.
How can I get internet on a plane half way across the Atlantic is another.
The ISS is better example still, as you don't need a phone or a plane ticket!
Just a diagram of where it will be and when, and a clear night sky.
You should also very quietly back out of the GPS satellites argument.
You might just find yourself unable to explain the orbital Sagnac effect.
To me it's irrelevant. FE doesn't claim to be scientific. It's more of a philosophical question. Does the Earth look flat? Yes. So the immediate answer of the empiricist must be that it is. So the question becomes, is there enough evidence that proves that the Earth is a whirling globe? What does and does not constitute evidence? Can supposed proofs that the Earth is round be adequately countered in a Flat Earth context? These are philosophical considerations, not scientific ones.
And of course this is all besides the fact that the core of FET is zeteticism, which as interpreted by the FE community is an alternative to science. So why should we be expected to be scientists?
There have been many experiments trying to prove the soul. Supposedly the body is slightly lighter directly after death. This was the supposed weight of the soul. There have been other experiments performed as well.
However, I don't think science will be able to prove the soul as it could never prove things in the 4th 5th 6th etc dimensions. These things are simply out of our pay grade as a 3 dimensional creature. We will only know so much.
I think the soul exist outside our 3rd dimensional existence. We only get random biproducts of it.
One thing I can say science has proven, is we are certainly more than the sum of our parts. Take that for what it is.
I would like to present for inclusion into the debate on the scientific method how people ignore or disregard that there may be payola involved with the peer review process, one of the pillars of that method.
Once an article is published in a journal, the author can contact associates known to read the journals and offer a nice gift along with a cheat sheet for how the experiment was conducted so it can be duplicated.
You know, at the same time you make a call there is a knock on their door delivering a vacation, a new set of tires, some fine jewelry...you get the drift.
So true believers of the scientific method really think these payouts to get similar results aren't made?
This will mean, by the way, that sceptimatic's methodology is superior to that of the scientific method.
Matter. In the beginning there was no matter. Only energy.
The first law of thermodynamics makes this obvious.
Obviously mountains exist. Nice counter point.
Ever been to space?
