1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: So How Fast Are We Moving?
« on: July 17, 2009, 04:52:36 PM »
it's a cop out for a flat earth once again
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Could you think of a better way to ask me to find an answer myself? (see this isn't a good way to discuss things with people)
How come the sun looks like an egg yolk?
I thought everything accelerates up at the same speed, just like the earth. How exactly would anything manage to bump into anything else?I mean...what makes them go towards the moon...and dont feel obligated to answer this one since it is a stray from the main question, but if there is no gravity why do we only see 1 side of the moon?
The moon is accelerating up. The moon goes toward the meteors. Also the moon exhibits gravitation, but not "gravity". Please see the sticky on Gravity/Gravitation.
Or, if you want to get back to basics, you can use Ancient Greek techniques to calculate the distance to, and size of, the moon.
http://www.noao.edu/education/astro/chile/archives/activities/lunar-distance-activity.pdf
It's basic trigonometry really, so get stuck in!
FEs believe there are giant blimps floating around acting as satellites. They call them stratellites.
What is more interesting is that you should be able to resolve the details on one of these through a telescope since they aren't very high at all and are, necessarily, very large.
However you can't. Just one of many problems with FE
Actually, I have already proven the existence of dangling lenses that are used by high altitude objects. NASA uses dangling lenses to either obfuscate an object, or to make it appear as though it were at a different distance.
Once again, how would you know you were going straight?
QuoteYes, doing circles. But if you follow a straight line, you would always be travelling south.
How are you supposed to travel in a straight line without something like a compass to relate our position to?
It's impossible in RE because, were it done with your method, discounting the fact you would fly into space, you would require Pac-man scrolling, as someone mentioned already.
Because you can't prove it
Since when has this stopped any scientific theory being accepted into general use? No scientific theory can be proven - see this thread (http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22424.0).
The Earth could be any geometry and this mechanism would still work.
Im not really sure about your first question. And your second post doesn't make any sense at all.
The first post. Why would bubbles be any different in FE than RE?
his IR radiation cannot escape through the layer of CO2 just as the Sun's IR cannot get in, but since the two values are not the same (more gets in than is reflected away), the Earth heats up. I see no reason why this wouldn't work both in RE and FE...
QuoteDue to a lack of another flat earth map.
Maybe if you guys start donating funding we'll go out and begin charting every square mile of the earth to make an accurate map.
pseudolites and stratelliteszqzkfejkdf and dsordsorg
all have the same definition: None
Google.
as of yet no one can explain this away
a 32 mile diameter sun could not accomplish the nuclear fusion necessary to become a bright sun
How do you know that the sun operates via nuclear fusion?
That just proves how shaky your proof is.
No.I know what proper is perfectly fine, you are the one making the claim that proper acceleration will be the same for all observers
Like I said, you don't know what the definition of proper is.
you are WAY in the minority. round earth is already accepted by 99.99999% of the (round) world. why would we have to prove that to you? that doesnt make any sense.
More sense than believing something just because almost everyone else believes it. That's called a fallacy.