91
Flat Earth Debate / Re: About the "believer", not the "theories"...
« on: June 17, 2009, 04:51:09 AM »Quote
Oh right, you can't refute the evidence because there's "too much of it". What a load. If you were truly interested in defending your beliefs you would address the points in the video and rebut them with evidence of your own.
Right. I'm not going to sit around for hours searching through the video to find this valid evidence. If you want to make a point, don't hide it in hours of nonsense.
Quote
Van Allen says they would. You know him, right? He's another of your "pillars of science".
Quote
See Van Allen's work.
Quote
Please see Van Allen's work for details. Do you own research. If you already knew the basics of your own model you wouldn't be asking these amateur questions and would know where to look.
Where does he make these claims? And what makes his word absolute truth? The fact he discovered them doesn't mean he knows the belts like the back of his hand.
Quote
Please look up the concept of Solar Flares. They are very powerful and very destructive.
I can't see why they would cause such a problem with sufficient shielding between the astronauts and the source. They are only really damaging to the complex electronic equipment we have in modern satellites.
Quote
Yes, I am sure their nylon Velcro beds and food stuffs are all very effective at blocking deadly radiation
Considering the radiation is mainly particles, I imagine they are quite effective.
Quote
You could go on, but you won't because you've realized that you cannot present contradicting evidence. You have no contradicting evidence what-so-ever to present.
Please don't twist my words. If you want me to analyse it, shorten it into something someone would be bothered to analyse.