Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sandokhan

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 224
While sitting here eating a sandwich I find it hard to cope with the thought of knowing this time next year...

Now you believe me?

Two of the antibodies (against Sars-Cov-2) are lethal: REGN10987 and B38.

This is the key to understanding why, so far, many of the vaccinees (cmRNA/adenovirus) have not developed severe forms of Covid-19.

Since the genetic code for the cmRNA vaccines includes PSEUDOURIDINE (Pseudouracil) and not URACIL (mRNA), all of the resulting proteins will be ISOMERIC as well. Therefore, the S-abs (antibodies) will be ISOMERIC. That is, they have nothing to do with Sars-Cov-2, what they will accomplish is to overwhelm the immune system with binding-type antibodies (isomeric) which will diminish the production of the "natural" neutralizing abs (which of course will include the lethal abs REGN10987/B38 as well).

Had the vaccinees received A TRUE MRNA VACCINE, most of them would have been diagnosed with severe cases of Covid-19.

A reason to celebrate? Consider this:

1. Should a new pandemic arise (let's say Mers-Cov-2/H. influenzae), the same thing is going to occur: the "natural" neutralizing abs will be overwhelmed by the ISOMERIC ABS (antigenic sin phenomenon).

2. Should a new pathogenic agent with ISOMERIC PROTEINS arrive from the atmosphere (an isomeric Sars-Cov-2) there are going to be huge problems.

3. The reversal of the geomagnetic field will affect the ISOMERIC ABS.

"When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized factors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus. It is precisely this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing."

Draconids - Oct 8

Orionids - Oct 21

S. Taurids - Sep 25 - Nov 25 (peak Nov 4-5)

N. Taurids - Oct 12 - Dec 2 (peak Nov 11-12)

Leonids - Nov 17

Geminids - Dec 13-14

Ursids - Dec 22

The last variant will be comet Encke itself.

Many researchers are trying to link the Cumbre Vieja volcano with Rev. 8:8; however, there is a certain sequence of events which must occur...

He included each and everyone of the afflictions you mentioned, including the one concerning the bladder. Scroll down to find the articles, perhaps the best ever written on the subject.

The cases in Japan are surging BECAUSE of the vaccination campaign.

Spike proteins are liquid crystals: they will act as antennas between the mycobacterium in the vaccinated folks and the mycobacterium in the atmosphere. These mycobacteria are sending electromagnetic copies of the cells over huge distances, now aided by a very performant wireless transmission, thanks to the spike proteins (and also the HeLa cells in the adenovirus vaccines).

To me, the most worrying situation is now concerning the Vero e6 vaccines.

Sars-Cov-1 - M. avium

Sars-Cov-2 - M. avium, in much higher quantities than in 2003, we are nearing the end of a geological/astronomical age

Sars-Cov-3 - M. influenzae (Haemophilus influenzae)

1915-1917 M. avium (called coronavirus), worldwide pandemic
1918-1919 M. influenzae (Pfeiffer's bacillus)

Prions are M. paratuberculosis.

Let me put an end to this right now.

M. avium has been isolated in covid-19 patients. (pg 9-12)

The current situation is this: delta, lambda, epsilon, eta, mu and C.1.2 are completely resistant to the cmRNA / adenovirus vaccines.

A third shot, specific for any of the variants, will unleash the antigenic sin phenomenon (i.e., it is useless).

A third shot, for the Wuhan original strain (which, incidentally, disappeared from view in march 2020), won't be of any help: the antibodies last at most six weeks. And those antibodies have nothing to do with sars-cov-2.

The vaccines are cmRNA, and not mRNA. cmRNA = chemically modified RNA.

Definition of cmRNA:

"cmRNA is mRNA that has been modified through the substitution of chemically modified bases for normal bases, such as pseudouridine for uridine."

The vaccines are coded with PSEUDOURIDINE (pseudouracil), an isomer of URIDINE. Different chirality, different chemical/biological functions, different configuration. A total disaster. All of the resultant proteins will be mutant.

The vaccines do not have a stop codon. Believe it or not. All of the resultant proteins will be mutant.

However, superficial application of these two criteria can lead to mistakes. I will take the CGN codon family for Arg to show an incorrect optimization of the two mRNA vaccines.
The designers of both vaccines considered CGG as the optimal codon in the CGN codon family and recoded almost all CGN codons to CGG. There are two lines of evidence suggesting that CGG is not the optimal codon. These multiple lines of evidence suggest that CGC is a better codon than CGG. The designers of the mRNA vaccines (especially mRNA-1273, Table 1) chose a wrong codon as the optimal codon.

Pfizer/BioNTech’s BNT162b2 mRNA features two consecutive UGA stop codons. Moderna’s mRNA-1273 uses all three different stop codons UGAUAAUAG. Are these the optimal arrangement?

With such a +1 frameshifting, a downstream in-frame stop codon cannot serve as a fail-safe mechanism. UGA is a poor choice of a stop codon, and UGAU in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines could be even worse.

One caveat in the reasoning above involves the replacement of U by N1-methylpseudouridine (Ψ) in the two vaccine mRNAs.

Therefore, the stop signals are ΨGAΨGA instead of UGAUGA in Pfizer/BioNTech’s vaccine, and ΨGAΨAAΨAG instead of UGAUAAUAG in Moderna’s vaccine. As Ψ is more promiscuous in base-pairing than U and can pair with both A and G and, to a less extent, with C and U, stop codons become more prone to misreading by tRNAs. It is for this reason that both mRNA vaccines use consecutive stop codons as a fail-safe mechanism, with the hope that no frameshifting occurs when the first stop codon fails. However, UGAU is known to cause a +1 frameshifting. It is reasonable to infer that ΨGAΨ may be the same. I have mentioned before that mammalian AZ1 gene with a stop codon context UGAU is prone to polyamine-induced +1 frameshifting. Such a +1 frameshifting defeats the purpose of having multiple stop codons as a fail-safe mechanism.

We find ourselves in the Spartan Virus scenario: only an exobiological solution will be offered. Now, remember that I have been writing about ICHOR for years here now. Ichor, the blood of the titans, is extremely toxic to humans.

The Sars-cov-2 genom (MN908947) has protein codes which belong to a cobra.

"The researchers used an analysis of the protein codes favored by the new cor.onavirus and compared it to the protein codes from cor.onaviruses found in different animal hosts, like birds, snakes, marmots, hedgehogs, manis, bats and humans. Surprisingly, they found that the protein codes in the 2019-nCoV are most similar to those used in snakes."

There are huge doubts about the RaTG13 bat genom sequence:

ACE2 proteins from snakes can bind to the RBD of the spike protein:

"However,the possibility that cold-blooded animals like snakes can serve as a host cannot be ruled out. The flexible interacting loop identified in our study may allow the virus to adapt to both the cold-blooded and warm-blooded hosts."

"BNT162b is a mRNA vac.cine for prevention of COVID-19. The vac.cine is made of a mRNA encoding forthe full-length SAR.S-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The sequence of the S protein was chosen based on the sequence for the “SAR.S-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1”, which was available when the program was initiated: GenBank: MN908947.3 (complete genome) and GenBank: QHD43416.1 (spike surface glycoprotein)."

"To generate the template for RNA synthesis, a DNA fragment encoding the SAR.S-CoV-2 P2280 S protein (based on GenBank: MN908947), including the amino acid exchanges K986P and 281 V987P, was cloned into a starting plasmid vector."

1913 Nobel Lecture, Charles Richet: theory of anaphylactic shock. Once a foreign protein (antigen) is introduced directly in the blood, the pacient becomes anaphylactized. That is, a second minute dose of the same antigen will unleash the anaphylactic shock.

"We are so constituted that we can never receive other
proteins into the blood than those that have been modified
by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates
by effraction, the organism suffers and becomes resistant.
This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of
revolt against the second parenteral injection which would
be fatal. At the first injection, the organism was taken
by surprise and did not resist. At the second injection,
the organism mans its defences and answers by the
anaphylactic shock."

mRNA for spike proteins belonging to sars-cov-2 has AGCU as a genetic code. cmRNA for spike protein being produced/created in the body has AGCΨ as a genetic code. A totally different chirality, biological/chemical functions.

The spike proteins from the vaccines are MORE pathogenic than the spike proteins from sars-cov-2:

You haven't done your homework on the list of diseases that you mentioned.

Here is someone that has done so:

Each and everyone of the afflictions you listed is caused by mycobacterium. His articles are some of the most informative in the business.

"It has been assumed that the protective effect of BCG vaccination is due to an epigenetic enhanced “trained innate immunity” whereby macrophages and natural killer cells are primed from the exposure to Mycobacterium bovis to eliminate any micro-pathogens."

Sure. Those bacteriophages will ONLY attack other mycobacterium. Just like I had stated before. Did I not tell you that there are no specific papers which can explain this "innate immunity response", and that everyone relies on bacteriophages to explain what is going on?

"Another possibility is that there may be heterologous immunity due to a protein in SARS CoV-2 that is homologous to a protein in Mycobacterium bovis. Such heterologous immunity has been documented between other pathogens, such as adenovirus and hepatitis C virus”

Exactly. That protein is UNIQUE to mycobacteria. It is a mycobacterium. Do you understand the meaning of the word "unique"? Those other examples concern VIRUSES.

No wonder you FAILED to address this:

"Immunohistochemistry documented that an antibody directed against the SARS-CoV-2 envelope, but not the spike or membrane proteins, strongly cross hybridized to 11/11 Mycobacterial species tested, including M. bovis. BlastP analysis showed high homology of the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein with 12 consecutive amino acids of the protein LytR C, which is a consensus protein unique to Mycobacteria."

Unique to Mycobacteria, i.e., sars-cov-2 is a mycobacterium (or mycoplasma for that matter).

Your message has just been thrashed.

"Immunohistochemistry documented that an antibody directed against the SARS-CoV-2 envelope, but not the spike or membrane proteins, strongly cross hybridized to 11/11 Mycobacterial species tested, including M. bovis. BlastP analysis showed high homology of the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein with 12 consecutive amino acids of the protein LytR C, which is a consensus protein unique to Mycobacteria."

Sars-cov-2 is a mycobacterium. Mycobacterium are accompanied by mycoplasma (pneumoniae).

Mycoplasma pneumoniae has spike proteins also, under the electron microscope they look like just the spike proteins from sars-cov-2.

Remember that in the period february-april 2003, everyone thought that Sars-cov-1 was a new form of Chlamydia pneumoniae.

Let me run this by you again:

"BlastP analysis showed high homology of the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein with 12 consecutive amino acids of the protein LytR C, which is a consensus protein unique to Mycobacteria.

If it's unique to Mycobacteria, then it is actually a mycobacteria. You have no more excuses.

All of the diseases listed in your message are caused by Mycobacterium, so yes the bacteriophages from BCG will immediately attack these mycobacteria.

Shifter, watch out for the Taurids in the southern semiplane (September 10 - November 20). The Taurid meteo shower will bring cometary dust from comet Encke, this time around with a NEW pathogenic agent (H. influenzae). Use eucalyptus (or mint) oil to coat your nostrils every time you go outside. Use apple cider vinegar to gargle (diluted in some water of course) before leaving home to go outside, also when you come back.

If you have vaccinated yourself: use honeysuckle, dandelion (tea/extract), omega-3, white pine needles (only if they contain suramin), bromelain from pineapple. Also this:

It is for TB

Then, you lose.

Quit bullshitting your readers with your quack opinions.

BCG works specifically against M. tuberculosis, nothing else. Please report here on HOW exactly the immune system is "stimulated". You won't find any specific papers, because they know it's due to the bacteriophages contained by the vaccine.

Dr. Nigel Curtis (from Australia) has already undertaken the largest study on BCG, using thousands of volunteers from all over the world: it works very well against covid-19.

You think the paper would have been published had they started off with "We think that covid-19 is caused by M. tuberculosis"? Of course not.

It's time for you to accept defeat.

In case you have just woken up from sleep, BCG is a vaccine against MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS.

How else are they going to get the paper past the peer-review? If they state from the very start that Covid-19 is caused by M. tuberculosis, nothing is going to get published. So they played it safe.

Make no mistake about it: BCG is a vaccine for M. tuberculosis, NOT for any viral disease. Why does it work so well, better than any other vaccine, by far? Because covid-19 is caused by a mycobacterium, that's why.

The answer is most definitely: Mycobacterium.

Best results of any vaccine, no side effects, BCG works against sars-cov-2: (NIH research)

A flat earth party would be a beacon of light in the midst of the current situation.

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 31, 2021, 10:45:04 AM »
Take a look at the debates back in 2015: ether, subquarks. As late as as 2020, I was mentioning Riemann zeta function waves, antigravitons and much more. A huge upgrade, thanks to my research.

Do not blame me for the decisions taken by the admin and the mods: they practically became lawyers for the worst repeat offenders in the history of this forum.

Since everything has failed, and no one wants to take part in the debates anymore, someone now has to pay for this state of affairs: the admin and the mods who made this happen.

We can't just have rab and jackblack the only ones who have to have posts approved in a forum. Might as well just block them from that forum altogether.

What other possible result can you expect when the admin herself steps in to protect the users who were spamming and flaming and attacking the FE?

Why have you allowed it to reach the point where it is commonplace? As administrator, you bear responsibility for the contents of the forum you oversee.

spacecowgirl told him to "fuck off".

I wonder how many people have left the forum because of this atmosphere. I would be lying if I said I hadn't considered it. Rather than an empty forum, you might find old users returning.

spacecowgirl told him to "fuck off".

If your advice for how to engage on a debate site is 'scroll past it,' is it any wonder things are 'out of hand?'
No human has perfect self control, and there are people that enjoy antagonizing. Don't hold anyone's hands. If you are an administrator, do your job or pass the mantle to someone that will, this is just negligence. This is the only site I have ever seen that thinks this is a healthy way to let discussion happen, or that the staff's duty is only in dealing with bots. Is this a debate site or 4chan?

spacecowgirl just shrugged her shoulders and persisted in destroying this forum.

This was an administrator. This was the supposed highest level of authority on this site, acting like the basest form of troll when questioned. There is never any excuse for quote manipulation and out-of-context remarks, and there is even less when you are supposed to be a staff member.

But suppose they are right. Suppose the users on this site do indeed all act like this, and that it isn't a matter of tensions being raised and a response to provocation. Why are you defending that? If this forum has truly deteriorated to the point where if you banned the aggression and insults, you would have no users left, why are you acting like that is a good thing?

spacecowgirl couldn't care less.

You allowed this to happen. Take responsibility, like you expect everyone else to.
From everything I have seen, Space Cowgirl is not fit to be an administrator. She is quick to ban for a non-existent personal slight, but cares nothing for long-term problems. She acknowledges that people should ignore and scroll past a user, but thinks their presence should remain because... why, exactly? If you want no one to engage with them, why do you want them here?

This was back in September of last year. We, the FE, gave up posting on this forum.

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 31, 2021, 09:12:06 AM »
There will be no upgrade to the AFET: we, the FE, should have quit posting messages here way back in 2015. This forum was Daniel's idea, and he abandoned it some six years ago. The RE will also soon quit this forum, there will be no one left.

I very rarely write on the stolenhistory forum.

For once, sandokhan is right. This forum is doomed.

It's all good, as it happens. Forums come and go. But we simply don't attract new members and our collective activity has been declining for months and probably years.

Facebook, reddit, tumblr cannot be blamed for the disaster caused by spacecowgirl (admin) and the two RE mods who practically destroyed this forum for the past five years.

Imagine this: spacecowgirl was someone who posted mostly in the lower forums. A RE. Not once, not even once, did she ever defend or even take part in some kind of a debate in the upper forums. She is to blame for the decline of this forum, but as you can see, she doesn't seem to understand what is going on. Totally unprepared to be admin, or to even dream of passing judgments on the hardcore FE members of this forum. When asked why the earth is flat, she invites the reader to "look out your window".

She is the one who carefully protected both rabinoz and jackblack while they wreaked havoc in the upper forums. rabinoz tried the same recipe over at the tfes forum: they shut him down in less than 24 hours. Both should have been immediately expelled from this forum. But the RE admin and mods of course were cheering on and very happy to see this forum being destroyed.

If it wasn't for the few of us, the true FEB, this forum would have been doomed ever since 2015. We kept it going. Big mistake.

Go over to scienceforums or physicsforums, tell them that you are FE and that you would like to be the admin or a mod. They would ban you in no time at all. Here, the worst enemies of FET were put in charge to destroy this forum as fast as they could.

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 30, 2021, 08:02:48 AM »
Please tell me which flat earther is banned to infinitive.

From the very start, davis' position was odd. He never participated in the debates other than to drop a few lines, and leave the hard work to us, his fellow FE that he cannot trust. But his days posing as a flat earth believer are over: nobody here (FE or RE) believes for a second that he regards FET as true. This is the main reason for his bizarre beliefs in the "non-euclidean model", where practically the earth is a globe but it is being perceived as a plane. This is the main reason for his not trusting the flat earth members and bringing in his fellow RE to destroy this forum. This is the main reason for him having banned permanently thork whom he knew to be a very outspoken FE and had very little chance to accomplish his plans while thork and parsifal were still around here. This is the main reason why humblescientist was practically banned from this forum. Under the RE administration, there has been a constant move to eliminate each and every true flat earth believer from this forum.

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 30, 2021, 01:49:06 AM »
You are RE. Certainly the last suitable place in the world for you would be as mod on a FE forum. Yet here you are. You have done everything in your power to destroy this forum: just take a look at the stats. But to you it is not a problem.

Our error was to continue to post messages beyond 2015: at that point in time we had no idea that this forum was going to become the personal playground of a single person whose whims have taken the FES hostage. And this person never made any meaningful contribution to FET (infinite earth conjecture does not count for anything). Someone has to pay for the destruction brought upon the FES in these past five years.

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 29, 2021, 10:50:47 PM »
Forget about stolenhistoryforums. You should worry much more about what has been going on here for the past eight years.

-the vendetta unleashed on flat earth believers/members (some of them were banned outright, some of them had to leave to tfes, some of us were told not to post here anymore)

-the bizarre appointment of RE admin and mods who of course did their best to turn this place into a torture chamber

-RE admin and mods who turned their back on the havoc wreaked in the upper forums by two users, a type of behaviour which would have never been allowed anywhere else (one of those users tried to accomplish the same thing over on the tfes forum, in less than 24 hours they applied the rules and eliminated the spam)

-someone has managed to lull Daniel into believing that he was the best choice to take care of the programming aspects of this forum, while he was  stealthily plotting to eliminate all of the proeminent flat earth users (he appointed RE admin and moderators to destroy the fabric of this forum)

Should I see a flat earther that I can reasonably trust, I'm happy to promote them to moderator. That said, both boydster and scg identify as flat earthers.

But boydster had the courage to come out and post recently that he is indeed RE, and nothing can change that.

So, is this the proof of a catastrophic level of incompetence, or a sure sign of a mole whose mission was to destroy the flat earth society from the inside?

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 29, 2021, 07:16:58 AM »
Forget about stolenhistoryforums. You should worry much more about what has been going on here for the past eight years.

-the vendetta unleashed on flat earth believers/members (some of them were banned outright, some of them had to leave to tfes, some of us were told not to post here anymore)

-the bizarre appointment of RE admin and mods who of course did their best to turn this place into a torture chamber

-RE admin and mods who turned their back on the havoc wreaked in the upper forums by two users, a type of behaviour which would have never been allowed anywhere else (one of those users tried to accomplish the same thing over on the tfes forum, in less than 24 hours they applied the rules and eliminated the spam)

-someone has managed to lull Daniel into believing that he was the best choice to take care of the programming aspects of this forum, while he was  stealthily plotting to eliminate all of the proeminent flat earth users (he appointed RE admin and moderators to destroy the fabric of this forum)

The Lounge / Re: Where is sandokhan?
« on: May 27, 2021, 04:47:16 AM »
There will be no upgrade to the AFET: we, the FE, should have quit posting messages here way back in 2015. This forum was Daniel's idea, and he abandoned it some six years ago. The RE will also soon quit this forum, there will be no one left.

I very rarely write on the stolenhistory forum.

Not fake news:

These 37 doctors used Covaxin: it was of no use against B.1.617.

Sure there is person to person transmission, but that is the secondary mode of passing on the pandemic.

Australia, so far, has implemented the vaccine program slightly.

Here is the news from Australia:

The more pressure is applied to the M. avium, the more variants will appear.

Covaxin was formulated for the Wuhan strain, nothing else. It is useless against the B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617 variants. As soon as India started their vaccination campaign in earnest (Feb - Mar) the number of cases exploded shortly afterwards.

PS. Only this chart counts, the rate of increase of the TOTAL number of cases in each state:

The other is the REPORTED number of cases.

Here is the situation in India:

Vaccines cannot protect against the new triple mutant variant B.1.617 which is evading vaccine protection.

The number of cases has increased at the same rate, everywhere at once in India.

Obviously, the principal mode of transmission of the pandemic cannot be person to person. Everywhere at once = an atmospheric source of the pathogenic agent.

More than half of the population in India has latent TB. The brutal vaccination program has awakened these latent mycobacterium in the vaccinated individuals.

Here is the lunacy: India is vaccinating its people against the original strain, the Wuhan variant, which has disappeared as long ago as March 2020. Yet, the new powerful strain is B.1.617 which cannot be countered by the vaccines currently used against covid-19.


It is the manufacturer who makes those statements, without any proof, in order to obtain the approval from the FDA.

Since BioNTech was promoting their product in their SEC Registration, their comments about the known dangers of gene therapy products have more credibility than their claims that their product is safer than the others.

Now, one year later, we know that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein has prions, and the mRNA vaccines practically force the body to create these very spike proteins.

You have a very short memory. I performed the calculations twice, both sets of proportions lead to the same correct result, no mistakes were made in any additions. What you required at that time, was to change the proportions, which I did. So you are lying.

What I am saying is that those physicists could not see a way out of the situation (a formula for the Sagnac interferometer which features the linear velocities), while I was able to provide this needed formula. That's all.

Dr. G.V. Bossche is no antivaxxer, on the contrary. What he is saying is that by using leaky vaccines during the pandemic, the most probable outcome is to create a situation where the new strains/variants can no longer be held under control.

This document has just been released to the public:

The document is an SEC Registration submitted by the German company, BioNTech SE, on December 31, 2019.

"Like Moderna and Pfizer, BioNTech SE produces an mRNA gene modification product called iNeST, which is similar to the COVID-19 vaccines."

"The BioNTech SE document was submitted to the SEC at about the same time as the first reports of COVID-19 started coming from China, proving that even before any COVID-19 vaccines were developed, the FDA was fully aware that mRNA products are gene modification products, as stated on page 16, “Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.”"

BioNTech SE acknowledges that gene therapy products are “well-reported” to have high levels of adverse side effects.

“There have been few approvals of gene therapy products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events associated with their testing and use. Gene therapy products have the effect of introducing new DNA and potentially irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell.” (page 26)

“Side effects observed in other gene therapies, however, could negatively impact the perception of immunotherapies…” (page 16)

“We also expect the centers using our product candidates, if approved, on a commercial basis could have similar difficulty in managing adverse events.” (page 17)

“Adverse events reported with respect to gene therapies or genome editing therapies could adversely impact one or more of our programs.” (page 27)

“Product candidates we may develop may be associated with an adverse immune response or other serious adverse events, undesirable side effects or unexpected characteristics.” (page 29)

Stop making fun of sandokhan's favorite horse doctor!

PS: Quiz for sandomath: how much is 2+5*3? It's very hard, don't feel bad if you can't find it.

Did you get vaccinated? Then, you better sit down.

Take a look at this:

You might think that you are looking at some interloper or someone whose only occupation is playing gul bara in some forgotten village in Uzbekistan.

What would happen if this individual would be given the task to create a vaccine to save the world? It is not a nightmare, it is actually happening. That's right. The only possible outcome would be to endanger the survival of the human race.

Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development. Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness. Back in 2015, Geert scrutinized and questioned the safety of the Ebola vaccine that was used in ring vaccination trials conducted by WHO in Guinea. His critical scientific analysis and report on the data published by WHO in the Lancet in 2015 was sent to all international health and regulatory authorities involved in the Ebola vaccination program. After working for GAVI, Geert joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office.

Only Vanden Bossche was selected to lead the most difficult job in vaccinology, to supervise the vaccination program for Ebola.

ARR = 100/10000 - 10/1000 = 1/10 - 1/100 = 0.1 - 0.01 = 0.99, which is exceptional

100/10000 is apparently 1/10, and 0.1-0.01 is apparently 0.99. Uhhh are you alright?

Do not flatter yourself. I haven't been paying any attention to your drivel, that is why I couldn't care less about what you write on this topic.

Have you forgotten that I have managed not once, but twice, to deliver formulas which no one else had been able to produce?

In 2018, the debate regarding the Sagnac effect had reached the point where the RE were demanding the CORRECT formula for the Sagnac effect. But no one else in history has been able to provide such a formula, not Einstein, Lorentz, Post, Michelson. But I could.

In 2019, I was able to invent the algorithm which generates the first 12 zeros of the Riemann zeta function, using only arithmetic (J. Brian Conrey said that any significant, new progress to be made in the study of the zeta zeros would come from using arithmetic, and not mathematical analysis).

A third booster shot on the way?

Even universal vaccines, to handle all of the variants at once:

However, only experts know that nothing can be done anymore, not even a third or a fourth booster shot will be of help: antigenic sin comes into play.

The world's leading expert on vaccines, Dr. G.V. Bossche explains the concept of antigenic sin and much more:

it has a damn good one

Please wake up.

The mRNA vaccine was created on January 11, 2020, on top of a table by the world's leading least knowledgeable epidemiologist.

As soon as the trial vaccines were started, using cell lines, within that same month, the first powerful strain appeared, the D614G.

As more trial vaccines were undertaken, in March of 2020, the D614G replaced the original Wuhan strain worldwide.

Your vaccine was originally created and designed SOLELY for the Wuhan strain. Not for anything else.

Dr. G.V. Bossche has pointed out this huge error again and again.

That is why these vaccines are not very useful when it comes to dealing with the even more powerful new strains, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, N.9, B.1.525, B.1.429.

Had the vaccination program been stopped, back in September 2020, we might have had a chance to end the Covid-19 pandemic. As such, more and more strains will appear, not to mention reassortment viruses, which will render any new vaccines (be it universal vaccines) as ineffective in dealing with the new situation.

The brutal vaccination campaign has dealt a blow to the M. avium and its passenger viruses, there might even follow a plateau period, until August 2021. Then, a third wave is going to start, which will be blamed wholly on the unvaccinated people.

ARR vs. RRR:

 Relative risk measures have the advantage of being stable across populations with different baseline risks and are, for instance, useful when combining the results of different trials in a meta-analysis. However, they have the major disadvantage of not reflecting the baseline risk of the individuals with regard to the outcome being measured. That is, relative risk measures do not take into account the individuals’ risk of achieving the intended outcome without the intervention. Therefore, they do not give a true reflection of how much benefit the individual would derive from the intervention, as they cannot discriminate between small and large treatment effects. They usually tend to overestimate the benefits of an intervention and, for this reason, drug companies and the popular media love relative risk measures! Absolute risk measures overcome these drawbacks because they reflect the baseline risk and are better at discriminating between small and large treatment effects.

To further understand the differences between absolute and relative risk measures, consider a hypothetical situation where, for those who have disease Y, the risk of dying from it over a five year period without treatment (baseline risk) is 0.005%, and the risk of dying from the same disease when you are treated with drug X is 0.001%. The drug company representative could come to you and say that the risk of dying from disease Y is reduced by 80% when you take drug X. Most people will jump at the chance of taking a drug that will reduce their risk of dying by 80%! Technically, the drug company is right as they are quoting the relative risk reduction (0.004/0.005×100). However, because the baseline risk of dying (0.005%) is so trivial, the 80% reduction in risk to 0.001% is also trivial and is unlikely to be of much clinical benefit to the patient. What the drug company representative may not tell you is that the absolute risk reduction is 0.005%–0.001% or 0.004% because compared to “reduced the risk by 80%”, the alternative statement “reduced the risk by 0.004%” immediately gives the feel of a trivial effect.

In this hypothetical example, the NNT is calculated to be 100/0.004 or 25 000. This means that you will need to treat 25 000 disease Y patients with drug X in order to prevent one of them from dying from the disease over the stated five year period. Thus the NNT would be much more beneficial in conveying the “truth” here as they are likely to immediately tell you that the reduction in the risk of dying with drug X is probably negligible.

No. Once you have the RR, then you must compute the ARR. Then and only then you will find out if the vaccine is really working.

I understand that you want to minimize the real figure of 0.7% (how can this be good), and the real figure of 142, but you can no longer hide the truth.

The ARR is a comparison (a substraction) between the control group figure and the test group figure. If one of those is equal to zero, then the ARR is no longer meaningful.

A vaccine must be 100% effective in such a dire case, as is the BCG.

You seem to live in a dream, or have a most serious cognitive dissonance problem.

Here you are denying the actual data which comes from the clinical study itself.

The ARR for that data is 0.7%, with a NNTV of 142. Your vaccine is not good, it is most definitely useless.

The FDA’s advice for information providers includes:

“Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.”

Where do you come up with these rules? The FDA quote you keep posting doesn't even say what you pretend it does. It is general advice mostly directed towards mentioning ABSOLUTE RISK, not absolute risk REDUCTION.


There is a formula for the ARR, not for the AR. Clearly the FDA protocol mentions the ARR, do you know of a formula for the AR? I thought so.

It is the ARR which gives then the most meaningful figure of them all: the NNTV.

You think your readers are fools?

The NNTV for the mRNA vaccines is 142, respectively 88. How is this good?

If the RR is zero, then you no longer need the ARR.

If RR is below 1, you have a protective effect.

If RR is above 1, you are in trouble.

What is the RR in the mRNA vaccine case? 0.049%. RRR is 95%. But they refused to publish the ARR figure, which in turn allows the NNTV to be computed.

ARR is no longer needed, if and only if, the RR is zero. In all other cases, the FDA clearly recommends that it be used.

If the trial used a perfect vaccine, you would have 162/20000 people in the control getting sick and 0/20000 getting sick in the test group. If you naively try to calculate the "ARR" based on that, you get that it is actually 162/20000=0.81%.

No. You get a NEGATIVE ARR of -0.81%. Which is a useless figure. I told you that once you have a RR of 0 it's all over, you have a perfect/total protective effect.

Now you understand why I did not bother with your description?

You have been avoiding the real data all the while: an ARR of 0.7% coupled with a NNTV of 142. You live in a dream.

How come you haven't collected the prize:

Believe it or not, that's not the most sought after prize. Every mathematician dreams of the Fields Medal in mathematics (the equivalent of a Nobel prize in physics).

What I did is to provide the algorithm required to find those first zeros, that is, while Riemann delivered an extraordinary link between the prime numbers and the zeta zeros, I pointed out that there is a third fundamental structure, a fractal of sequences (26.7, 53.4, 80, 136.1, 534) which captures and generates the zeta zeros perfectly.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 224