31

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Energy.

« on: September 03, 2008, 12:10:36 AM »

can we get back onto topic as opposed to pointing out other peoples grammatical errorrs.

(the spelling mistake is intentional)

32

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: help me

« on: September 03, 2008, 12:07:02 AM »

so i could make up any conspiracy, and according to thier logic, no matter how much evidence there is against it, it is true because there is no evidence of it. it could be becuase it doesnt exist, but hey, what you gonna do about it

33

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Trip to Antarctica.

« on: September 03, 2008, 12:05:18 AM »

so, the ice wall is behind antactica? is this in the FAQ? where are the ice guards? how far away is the ice wall? so that guy who sailed around the ice wall, actually sailed around the bit of ice beyond the ice wall? is there a distinct boundary between antactica and the ice wall? has anybody been there? is anyone going to answer there questions!

34

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Meteorites and Asteroids

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:59:50 PM »

i stand corrected. what are they called when they are up there then?

35

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Tripping the Light Fantastic.....again

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:59:10 PM »

yet another topic that we have shown the true tactics of the FE's, sciencer. if we ask the wrong questions, the thread is ignored until it falls off the first page and is forgotten. amybe there is a FEFE's conspiracy!

i challenge the FE's. keep this thread going with sensible answers.

36

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: This Theory is Amusing

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:56:31 PM »

the tides are caused by tilting of the earth, but that doesnt explain how there are two tides on opposite sides of earth.

37

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Few questions I have

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:52:00 PM »

but if there were no sloths, those last few posts would never have happened... god must have seen this topic in his great plan and created an amusing animal...

38

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Seriously

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:50:20 PM »

then you are almost at the shocking plot twist at the end...

39

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: The Sun and It's Movement

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:49:41 PM »

they have to be moving. i dont know about lateral motion, but they are accelerating up and 9.81ms². obviously...

40

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: help me

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:48:09 PM »

dont you remember, the only proof of the conspiracy is that there is no proof. make sense of that and i will belive anything you say

41

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Near-future technology will put an end to FE theory?

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:45:21 PM »

i'll just sit back and watch as history repeats itself

42

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Seriously

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:44:33 PM »

have you got to the bit with the dragons

43

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Tripping the Light Fantastic.....again

« on: September 02, 2008, 01:38:45 PM »

That map they used looks pretty flat to me...

maybe we should give them one of those puzzle ball 3d globe jigsaw things, will that disprove your theory?

44

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Near-future technology will put an end to FE theory?

« on: September 02, 2008, 01:36:57 PM »

according to the "why bother" thread, the russians discovered the conspiracy in the first place.

45

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Meteorites and Asteroids

« on: September 02, 2008, 01:34:01 PM »

Meteorites are pieces of rock from space that have fallen to the surface of the Earth. Asteroids are pieces of rock in space orbiting about the north celestial pole.

that is not technically correct. asteroids by definition are not just rock, they have a significant proportion of ice. meteorites do not have to fall to earth to be meteorites. just thought that i would point this out as we are on a forum of painfully padantic people

46

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Few questions I have

« on: September 02, 2008, 01:27:52 PM »

that explains everything...apart from the duck billed platypus

47

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: antarctica

« on: September 02, 2008, 01:26:54 PM »

well, that was a productive post 

48

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Proof

« on: September 02, 2008, 12:06:24 PM »

coincedence? i think not

49

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ice Guards

« on: September 02, 2008, 12:04:33 PM »

yeah, just laugh at the FE's

50

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Tides

« on: September 02, 2008, 12:04:01 PM »

wtf? maybe the ice wall is infinite. or maybe it is a giant circular glacia moving toward the centre of the FE so it keeps getiing replenished... or, or... or maybe, erm...

51

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ice Guards

« on: September 02, 2008, 12:02:25 PM »

my brain hurts

52

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Tides

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:58:13 AM »

if it is caused by a seesaw affect, why are there two tides at any one time on opposite sides of earth?

53

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: antarctica

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:55:23 AM »

hmmm. you could be onto something there...

54

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Ice Guards

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:54:51 AM »

Main Entry:    sound
Function:    noun
Etymology:    Middle English soun, from Anglo-French son, sun, from Latin sonus, from sonare to sound; akin to Old English swinn melody, Sanskrit svanati it sounds
Date:    13th century

1 a: a particular auditory impression : tone b: the sensation perceived by the sense of hearing c: mechanical radiant energy that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium (as air) and is the objective cause of hearing

2 a: a speech sound <a peculiar r-sound> b: value in terms of speech sounds <-cher of teacher and -ture of creature have the same sound>

3 archaic : rumor, fame

4 a: meaningless noise bobsolete : meaning c: the impression conveyed : import

5: hearing distance : earshot <within sound of your voice>

6: recorded auditory material

7: a particular musical style characteristic of an individual, a group, or an area <the Nashville sound>

It can be "the objective cause of hearing" without being heard.

1b also supports my assertion.

But there are definitions that don't so it's moot.

what?!?
so sound isnt sount until somebody hears it? how does that definition prove your theory?

55

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:49:45 AM »

I'm looking at you, Osama Bin Laden. I admire how subtly you cut me off before I could get a decent argument in. This forum isn't neutral; it's a one-sided totalitarian state designed to shelter those who are too weak-minded to accept the vastness of the THREE-DIMENSIONAL universe.

You're one-sided. Why don't you think about it this way: maybe the topic in my thread has been mentioned, maybe that's the reason why it is locked.

Oh, and mods can tolerate stupidity only to a certain extent.

then why arent all the FE's banned?

56

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Seriously

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:48:20 AM »

you make a good point. i think that that is a far more pressing matter than the shape of the earth.

we must know!

57

Flat Earth Q&A / antarctica

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:42:51 AM »

so. in the FE theory, antarctica is a giant wall of ice. there are 600 or so government men patrolling it. what about all the people who claim to have been to antarctica?

58

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Proof

« on: September 02, 2008, 11:39:24 AM »

wow. we're onto two pages and still all the FE's (i'm looking at you, narc!) have avoided the question!

funny that...

59

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: shadow zones

« on: May 15, 2008, 12:50:41 AM »

why are you FE's ignoring this thread, i want an answer!

60

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Question

« on: May 15, 2008, 12:50:02 AM »

lol