1
The Lounge / Re: What's up Texas?
« on: July 26, 2020, 06:47:20 PM »We can't watch the Montreux video in the US.
Massive yikes. Frenchies win again.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
We can't watch the Montreux video in the US.
For almost a year now, I do not know what to think. Which theory is true FE or RE? Please help me I am so confooooosed![]()
Why would the goverment fake the space program, that would cost a lot, why would they not want us to know that the earth is flat? Why do they want me to believe what is wrong? And if the earth is round, should we not slip down from it? I have so many questions!
To balance important details such as which URL to commit to as the home of TFES must weigh heavy at times. I don't know if much has been discussed with regards to that, but I'd be interested to hear what is being said?
The earths shape is not an opinion. We are all Round Earthers.
Yes, well, that's all well and good until the scientific community makes claims concerning truth, which they frequently do.Just which claims are you referring to?
And of course, if by "because it works" you in fact mean 'because it describes the universe accurately', then that is a claim to to truth, obviously.Truth or statement of fact?
The bolded point is precisely the problem. Everyone talks about the superiority of the scientific method, except there are problems with the method as defined, and on top of that it is rarely practised as defined.What problems with the scientific method are you referring to?
There is no conflation of philosophy and theoretical physics. No engineer I've ever worked with has mentioned any philosophical precepts when he's been designing a 12-lane multispan suspension bridge.
J Davis,
To be honest I do find almost all fields of philosophy to be interesting. I dabbled in courses on western philosophies and pragmatism in college. I do understand that there is large field of philophy that deals with the implications of science and what constitutes science. However, those fields, while fascinating, have no real impact on science itself. Science is driven by its pragmatic qualities. We adopt a scientific theory because it works and that is what a scientist worries about. Not the philosophy of.
In any case, this thread isn't about dissecting science. It is about the results of science such as the inventions and discoveries we enjoy today, and how those results would compare with a zetetic world, where testing a hypothesis is avoided at all costs.
There is currently no contemporary philosophy involved in the sciences, which are purely theoretical. You need to go back to the periods of Democritus, Lucretius, or Diderot to find any evidence of philosophical input into science.
They were all intended to make the point that members such as sceptimatic were repeatedly posting totally off-topic, puerile, personal insults rather than engaging in any focussed debate.
The Double by Fyodor Dostoyevesky.
Loved it. I want to see a movie made out of it, set in modern times, with Jim Carrey in the main role.
I understand why you might not want to stay logged in forever (if you're visiting from work, or share a computer), but you could try staying logged in for longer than 60 minutes.