Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - narcberry

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
Flat Earth Debate / How many times...
« on: April 10, 2007, 03:20:30 PM »
Just curious how many contradictions people have encountered thus far.

Flat Earth Debate / Shoes
« on: April 10, 2007, 09:53:45 AM »
An honest poll for 5 days.

Flat Earth Debate / The world accepts a round earth
« on: April 09, 2007, 08:43:29 PM »
The famous round-earther argument: "you guys are idiots, the whole world knows the earth is round so stfu, son'ed"

Welcome to the world we live in. These are the reasons the earth is round:

OMG, I've been ignoring the giants all around me, the world truly must be round!!

Flat Earth Debate / Astrological Lies
« on: April 09, 2007, 08:33:37 PM »
Has any round-earther ever noticed the basic tool an astronomer uses?

It begs the question, why does astronomy rely on fish-eye lenses? Well the answer is simple. This is a long-running conspiracy tactic to encourage personal testimony of a "round-earth." But, ironically, you can look out of your undistorted window and view a flat earth. Welcome, to the real world.

Flat Earth Debate / Gravity proven false
« on: April 05, 2007, 04:31:28 PM »
Gravity Force, according to your Isaac Newton:
F = Gm1m2/r2

Limr->0[Gm1m2/r2] = Inf

So If I walk over to my TV, and reduce the distance that separates us from 10m to 0m, the gravitational force will become infinite (assuming both me and my TV have a mass greater than 0). This is not the case. Even at a distance of 0m from my TV, I feel no force. In fact, the only force I feel is towards the earth, down. As if it were accelerating towards me.

Flat Earth Q&A / Which way is up again?
« on: April 05, 2007, 03:43:07 PM »
1: A bubble will go up in China
2: A bubble will go up in the United States
3: If the earth is round, bubbles will rise outwards from the earth
4: Since bubbles always rise up, the earth cannot be round

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Evolution debunked EZ-version
« on: April 05, 2007, 03:10:20 PM »
A species takes on characteristics that favor it's ability to survive.

Most texts and sources on evolution intentionally ignore a very important factor. Evolution should take place across species. Lets imagine a valley. This valley has many types of animals and many types of food. But lets consider two species whose migratory patterns are isolative to this valley. In addition, they only feed on grass. Lets call one, a cow. Lets call the other a horse.

They are very different species. One is very fast. One is very dumb. But ultimately they have the same purpose, to live in the valley and eat the grass.

In evolution, we learn that an eye will evolve in a long chain of evolutions. This occurs with thousands to billions of slight changes that eventually yeild an eye. Each of these changes are very slight, and they must be universally accepted across a species. Most of these stages are useless and can hinder the animal.

If the tinyest changes to the development of an eye can occur, why have the dramatic differences between a cow and a horse led to the extinction of one and a domination of the valley for the other?

This is why the topic is avoided by evolutionists. If they would consider this, the earth would be populated by only a fraction of the species that currently live here. The variety of species and complexity of their functioning parts all lead to a universally unlikely evolutionary theory.

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Evolution debunked
« on: April 05, 2007, 02:51:34 PM »
The biggest, and most ignored, fact about evolution is it ideas shouldn't apply to a singularity of special(species) relationships. That is to say, most of the effects of evolution work across species. This is a huge topic, so I will keep my claim small and concise.

If two species occupy the same terrain and feed on the same diet, they are in direct competition with each other. The factors that would evolve an ape into a man are infinitessimally small in comparison to the factors that should have made the majority of bovines extinct by now.

Open your eyes, evolution was only embraced when a social acceptance of moving away from christianity occured. It is simply a method used to justify denying a peoples faith in their God.

Flat Earth Debate / A Spheres Curve
« on: April 04, 2007, 03:49:01 PM »
I keep hearing that a spheres curve is less and less pronounced the larger the sphere is. At what point do RE'ers stop extending the size of the sphere? As long as the sphere keeps getting bigger and bigger, it becomes more and more flat. Meaning, as earths radius approaches infinity, the world becomes flat.

So really, if they keep going on in this way, they will soon believe in a flat earth like us. So I propose we no longer interfere with RE'ers, since they will convince themselves.

Flat Earth Debate / What proof exactly?
« on: April 04, 2007, 02:37:23 PM »
I keep hearing RE'ers say there are mountains of proof that the earth is round... So, what proof exactly? And dont post some secondhand photoshop picture. I mean actual proof.

Flat Earth Debate / Further FE evidence
« on: April 04, 2007, 07:32:24 AM »
The northern shore of Africa is visible from the south of Europe. Yet the Mediterranean sea is too long to see over if the world is round.. Perhaps some of you are considering the flat earth more seriously now.

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Trinity of FE Proof
« on: April 03, 2007, 12:57:20 PM »
Here I will discuss three simple proofs of a flat earth. I chose three since if you need more you will never be convinced of truth. I chose simple since most people that believe in a round earth are idiots.

1. Global Warming
A. The sun's light contains ultra-violet light
B. Flat-earth'ists believe that warmth comes from beneath the earth, not above
C. Round-earth'ists believe that warmth comes from the sun
D. Greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere has been rising
E. There has been a climb in global temperatures

1. The ultra-violet light that is reflected back where it came is directly proportional to the amount of amount of greenhouse gasses.
2. As greenhouse gasses rise, the earth receives less of the suns ultraviolet light.
3. Our greenhouse gas concentrations are rising, our ultraviolet light consumption is falling, our temperature is rising.
4. Ultraviolet light is not the cause of temperature rise.
5. The upper atmosphere is blocking more and more sources of heat that are beneath it.
6. The source of heat from the sun is declining, the source of heat from beneath the atmosphere is rising.
7. Temperature rises are caused by heat beneath the atmosphere.
8. This is not consistant with round earth theory.
9. This is consistant with flat earth theory.

2. Earths Curve
A. A surfaces curve is the sum of its parts

1. A small piece of ground can be perfectly flat.
2. The earth consists of billions of these flat surfaces.
3. The sum of billions of flat surfaces is a giant flat surface.
4. The earth is flat.

3. Air Mass
This is a proof by contradiction.
A. The air consists of gasses with mass
B. The earth is a giant sphere that rotates

1. Our atmosphere is fluid and unattached to earth.
2. The atmosphere has mass and therefore momentum.
3. The atmosphere will remain motionless without a force acting upon it.
4. The earth provides a negligeable force on the atmosphere.
5. The atmosphere is not motionless (as in moving several hundred miles per hour westward).
6. Therefore some force acts on the entire atmosphere that it moves generally at the same speed as the earths surface.
7. There is no such force.
8. Therefore the earth cannot be rotating at such a speed.
9. This is a contradiction.

I am excited to hear any responses to my proofs. I will not, however, respond to any females in the community, unless they are acting on behalf of their husbands.

Edit: rearranged so that a cause-effect relationship is not implied. Many dont understand how proofs actually work.

Flat Earth Debate / Proof of FE
« on: March 23, 2007, 03:54:25 PM »
1: Person A can have his home leveled parrallel to the earth
2: Person A's neighbor can level his home using the same vector
3: There exists a person in France
4: There exists a person in Romania
5: There exists an urban path between the person in France and the person in Romania
6: Each building on this path can be leveled using its neighbors vector
7: Therefore the path between France and Romania is flat
8: If the earth is round its curvature would be noticeable from France to Romania
9: Therefore the world is not round, but is flat at least where an urban path exists

Flat Earth Q&A / Unbiased FE vs RE Poll
« on: March 23, 2007, 03:25:42 PM »
There, this should give us more accurate data.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]