1

Flat Earth Debate / Flat Earth Thread Sprouts on Volconzo

« on: September 01, 2008, 01:41:46 PM »

http://www.volconvo.com/forums/science-technology/22868-flat-earth-society-2.html#post537119

Hurry Tom Bishop. Defend Flat Earth with me.

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Correction for FAQ

« on: January 13, 2008, 06:02:58 PM »

"Q: "If the Earth was indeed a flat disc, wouldn't the whole planet crunch up into itself and eventually transform into a ball?"

A1: If the Earth generated a gravitational field, yes, it would eventually happen, after a billion years maybe. FE assumes that the Earth does not generate a gravitational field.  What we know as 'gravity' is provided by the acceleration of the earth."

If the earth is accelerating, it is creating a gravitation field, which is why we are standing here right now, according to FE.
More precisely, the earth is warping space-time in a way that all of us are moving along the warps, as if going down a slide. 
source: "The use of the term acceleration in conjunction with gravity arises from Einstein's principle of equivalence, which was a cornerstone in the development of the general theory of relativity. This principle states that the force produced by a gravitational field is qualitatively the same (in terms of how it affects physical objects, time, and space) as the force produced when a reference frame accelerates." http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci804378,00.html

So, if the Earth is 4 billion years old, then wouldn't it have become a sphere?

3

Flat Earth Q&A / Satellites, and the False information they provide

« on: December 23, 2007, 02:04:04 PM »

Aura (satellite)- Since this satellite is fake, you know, since we can't send things into space, according to FEers, then we dont know anything about the ozone, since that is what this satellite studies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura_%28satellite%29

Hubble Telescope- All the breakthroughs of the Hubble telescope are fake, because it actually doesnt exist. The universe might be expanded, or not, as nothing is known about the Hubble constant, you know, the value at which the universe is suppose to be expanding.  Oh, and those accounts of those really old galaxies being found at the edge of the universe? False. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_telescope#Important_discoveries

WMAP- That big hole in the universe? A lie. Because this telescope doesnt exist, that hole doesnt either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WMAP#Findings_so_far_from_WMAP

What say you, brother Tom?

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Discussion on Anarchy

« on: April 17, 2007, 11:08:00 AM »

This thread is for the discussion of the topic of anarchy, and if it is a logical political idea.

I'll go first. I believe anarchy can work.


Thread dedicated to Nestor Makhno

5

Flat Earth Debate / Workin' Round the Clock

« on: April 13, 2007, 06:06:08 AM »

SO if all these pictures and videos and what have you are all fake(how many are there 100.000s, millions?) who sits there and makes them? 3 damn people. And all the videos and what not that astronauts think they see in space, this would be onm a near unprecedented scale I would imagine. All these pictures and videos that have to be made, some broadcast live to companies. Wow.

6

Flat Earth Debate / Cosmic Background Radiation

« on: April 10, 2007, 11:29:31 AM »

Cosmic Background radiation proves there was a Big Bang.
To prove cosmic background radiation, you need satellites.
In FE, there are no satellites, therefore, no complete proof of Big Bang.
WHat say you, Tom Bishop, my wonderful brother?