1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Zombie Jesus
« on: April 06, 2010, 11:52:31 AM »
Nah, I've just been checking this thread for the last few years. That's how much I've missed you!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
It wouldn't be that big of deal to change it. If the day was used as the SI base unit of time, it would be defined as 794243384928000 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom. The meter would then be defined as the distance traveled by light in 1/25902068371200 of a day.
Units for velocity, momentum, acceleration, force, energy, power, torque, electric current, voltage, electric field strength, entropy and probably quite a few more that I'm forgetting depend on the base unit of time. If you redefine the base SI unit of time, you need to recalibrate every instrument measuring such a quantity.
I was in Montreal years ago, having dinner with a couple of carpenters who were visitin?g from near Paris. They were describing a brilliant technique whereby they had vastly simplified layout for their jobs. Instead of using 1 meter as a standard, one of them said, we use 1.2 meters. That way we hardly ever have to deal with decimal points, as 12 can be divided by 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and itself.
And I said, "You mean, like the foot?"
And I swear, they both slapped their foreheads and made various French exclamations of astonishment. And the most significant thing for me was that they knew that the foot has twelve inches in it. They had just never considered that there might be a logical reason for it. But 1.2 meters, well, that made sense.
We had a very productive discussion that night, getting into the logic behind radical notions like sixteenths and eighths, which allow for useful increments of change, instead of the orders-of-magnitude leaps that the Metric system locks one into. And I told them about an old framing square I had, which was primarily in inches and fractions, but had a little hundredths scale in one corner. The idea here is that one can calculate the constants for things like rafter runs very precisely, in hundredths of an inch, then use a pair of calipers to find the nearest sixteenth or eighth, once the run had been multiplied out to full length. They got it right away, saw how the square makes use of decimals where they are useful for fine-grain tweeziness but lets the operator escape into easier- to-see-and-work-with fractions. And by the way, the 1.2 meters trick might be common in France, for all I know, as I have heard of it from other people. If so, it's a clear case of common sense finding a way to deal with what is only ostensible logic.
Trolling fail.
See the top wave has more squiggles in the same amount of length. Doesn't that mean that it travels more distance? That is what my OP was about. Or at least, wouldn't it be accelerating at a different rate? Or am I taking the 'wave' thing too literally?
Hotlinking fail.
You are a wormhole.Time travel would have to be more of a jump than a change of direction, I guess.
You mean like applying time dilation between the two ends of a wormhole?
Incidentally, I had an interesting idea regarding this: suppose you had two ends of a wormhole, A and B, with a time difference of t between them - B being the one farther into the future, so that you go from A to B to move forward through time and vice versa. Now, if we place wormhole A inside wormhole B, it will come out of wormhole A at some point in time t before it was placed into wormhole B. That is to say, we can double the time difference between a pair of temporally separated wormhole portals by placing one inside the other.
More generally, we can increase the time difference between two temporally separated wormhole portals t1 apart by passing one of them through another pair of temporally separated portals t2 apart. If we pass both of them through this gate in opposite directions, we can achieve a temporal separation of t1 + 2t2. So, we could obtain a time machine with years in between the two portals by simply flying one portal around the Earth and then effecting repeated applications of this technique, as opposed to the conventional "wait seventy years for a rocket to fly to some faraway place and back at near light speed".
Now all we need to do is invent a wormhole.
Agreed. At least, that is the way I understand it.Hmm, that seems completely nonsensical, circular, and moot to me.I thought the speed of yourself through time is 'c'
Isn't the speed of time 'c'? As in, the time component of the four-velocity of an object at rest,
[gamma][speed of light] = [1][speed of light]
the speed of something else through time changes by its relationship to you.
Maybe our time traveling is due to momentum, we can only go in one direction because we are unable to reverse our path.
Temporal momentum would be unit equivalent to mass. And how do you suppose we might obtain a source of temporal thrust without violating the law of conservation of mass-energy?
Last random though. If time is another dimension then shouldn't we be able to measure it in units of length. I always though of time sort of like a flip book. each page being one plank second apart. so what is the distance between the pages. it makes sense to me that all dimensions would have the same minimum length so that one plank meter would be equal to one plank second. so you should be able to convert seconds to meters and vice versa. like I said a random though.
I don't remember you.
FUCK YEAH I REMEMBER YOU. You still do that sidewalk surfing jazz?
No computer and no internets for a year? You poor toothyThat was funny homonym action! Say something in Finnish.
I'm still in Finland. Not been up to much apart from Finnish classes but they've finished for the summer now.
Everyone else is dead Dave
It's not a pipe.
It's not a painting of a pipe.
It's not even a digital image on your monitor of a painting of a pipe.
It's electrical connections and neural patterns in your brain.
If we bothered making concepts extreme everything would be reduced to a reiteration of perception, and communication would be incredibly inefficient. I'd most often say it is a pipe because that is the most important aspect I would share with others.