Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Battery72

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: why we cannot trust scientists
« on: March 04, 2015, 02:52:58 PM »
time to recap.

oxygen in scuba tanks can be safely inhaled, unlike many gases. it actually improves heat circulation. when it runs out, the pressure keeping loose particles from the inside of the scuba tank is gone, however, so the diver inhales loose particles of metal etc. these are fatal.

fire depends on a fuel source and heat. it needs free space for movement (which is heat). smother it, and it loses that movement. no extra assumptions about a fantasy oxygen required. don't forget, as i have pointed out many times before, if you put a match in oxygen the fire looks completely different.

i have never said aether cannot be detected. i was only talking about aetheric whirlpools above the earth, out of our reach. however, by your logic, you're going to explain it away as some fantasy.

i have made my case clearly, and answered every question posed easily and repeatedly. anyone who reads what i've said with an open mind should see the truth.

what??? when a diver runs out of air he is not inhaling anything......how they work out your theory of oxygen keeping the poisonous particles at bay? What a joke.

2
Flat Earth Debate / Re: why we cannot trust scientists
« on: March 03, 2015, 02:51:06 PM »
JRS, what happens when a scuba diver runs out of air ???

3
Not until you admit the truth. We have now proved it beyond any doubts:
1) your formula
2) your picture
3) = flat earth

To my 3 buddies flat-earthers: As you might have noticed, they are now doing personal attacks, character assassination, because they are unable to confront the formula and the picture, which their colleagues have posted on wikipedia.

We should all insist with the following strategy: keep pushing the Chicago skyline pictures, and the wikipedia formula. Until they're brainwashed, and start accepting the truth, just like they pushed lies on us with the opposite theory, for 500 years.

Take also note of their Luciferian signatures and blasphemous avatars. I don't think it is a coincidence. These people worship the devil.

Your Chicago picture prove a round earth dumbass.......

I like heavy metal, I must worship the devil lol.........

Maybe you are worshiping the devil without knowing it. Look up John Todd and related whistleblowers:

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">Demons Behind The Music Industry (Ex Illuminati explains)

Obviously I am not posting this for you but for the others, because by your language and reasoning, you seem to be up there with great thinkers such as Beavis and Butt-Head. There's no hope for you. You will be the last one to find out the truth -- and even then you will not understand it, but will accept it because everyone else has changed his mind, and you have learned to conform. And you will then say "Your Chicago picture prove a flat earth dumbass.......", equivalent to saying "the majority says so, so that is the truth". But I have good news: you are so stupid that you are certainly in good faith. So, congratulations on being an innocent idiot. And by the way, you're guilty for being an idiot, because reasoning is available to everyone.

Actaully I play my records backwards so I can so I hear the subliminal satanic messages lol  ;D

4
Not until you admit the truth. We have now proved it beyond any doubts:
1) your formula
2) your picture
3) = flat earth

To my 3 buddies flat-earthers: As you might have noticed, they are now doing personal attacks, character assassination, because they are unable to confront the formula and the picture, which their colleagues have posted on wikipedia.

We should all insist with the following strategy: keep pushing the Chicago skyline pictures, and the wikipedia formula. Until they're brainwashed, and start accepting the truth, just like they pushed lies on us with the opposite theory, for 500 years.

Take also note of their Luciferian signatures and blasphemous avatars. I don't think it is a coincidence. These people worship the devil.

Your Chicago picture prove a round earth dumbass.......

I like heavy metal, I must worship the devil lol.........

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 18, 2015, 05:33:47 PM »
cikljamas, again, the sun always rises in the east and sets in the west. To trace the arc of the sun when in the southern hemisphere you need to be facing north. To trace the arc of the sun in the northern hemisphere you need to be facing south. MILLIONS of people see this every day. I summer the sun will be as close to overhead as it is possible and in winter it will be closer to the horizon.

6
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 12, 2015, 03:15:39 PM »
so cikljamas,  when I skype my brother who lives in texas USA with me living in melbourne australia and both of us are in daylight.....is that Satan deceiving me?B ::)

7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 11, 2015, 04:21:40 PM »
Cikljamas, just showing you that indeed there is daylight in Australia and the US for a period of time. Do you have facetime or skype? Anyone can prove it. My Brother lives in the USA and I have skyped him when both countires were in daylight. What do you say now?  :P

8
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 11, 2015, 02:52:59 PM »
I live in Melbourne Australia. When I'm watching golf from the USA 9am in the morning, it is still daylight in the afternoon in the US. This is live TV and you cannot dispute it.

Cikljamas, what do you say about this?

9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 10, 2015, 04:58:03 PM »
I was joint pointing out how the sun is shining in both places at the same time for 3 to 4 hours or so.  ;)

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: February 10, 2015, 04:00:55 PM »
I live in Melbourne Australia. When I'm watching golf from the USA 9am in the morning, it is still daylight in the afternoon in the US. This is live TV and you cannot dispute it.

11
Flat Earth Debate / Re: About that shadow object
« on: December 23, 2014, 02:52:34 AM »
JROA, how is it then that round earth predictions can be made with all eclipses so far in advance?

Predicting the future from the past?

 So you are saying that worldtime.com can predict the right atmospheric conditions to make the moon look red based on the past?

12
Flat Earth Debate / Re: About that shadow object
« on: December 22, 2014, 07:05:51 PM »
JROA, how is it then that round earth predictions can be made with all eclipses so far in advance?

13
Flat Earth Debate / Re: About that shadow object
« on: December 22, 2014, 02:49:25 PM »
What ARE these "atmoplanic conditions" ?

Pressure, temperature, pollen, smog, etc. etc.  Is this the first time you have heard of these things?  You people are really scraping the bottom of the barrel to make posts like this in the debate section.  If you have been beat, then just concede.  I know not all of you have the ability to make a proper debate, but you don't need to waste the rest of our time by asking questions that you already know the answers to.

So this is predictable hundreds of years in advance jroa?

14
Flat Earth Debate / Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« on: December 01, 2014, 05:05:50 PM »
If there is a global conspiracy, why then has this website not been shut down? We all know governments are able to shut down suspicious websites at will. Surely any authority would have noticed this website by now..... ;)

15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: International Pilot here with some Q's
« on: November 27, 2012, 01:26:21 PM »
Half of the OP's questions remain unaswred in typical style. I'm still waiting for an answer as to how the sun magically reappears in the east all the time.

16
Flat Earth General / Re: LIVE Stream from ISS
« on: November 14, 2012, 01:10:46 PM »
You said that you saw it yourself.  How much more evidence do you need?

I see planes in the sky, too, but that doesn't mean I'm going to assume they are in space. The only difference between the ISS and a plane is that someone told you the ISS is in space.

For most people the videos, pictures and live feeds are the real evidence (unless proven otherwise). If you're thinking differently, please provide definition of real evidence in your words.

Most people have a very low standard of evidence, you, for example. Most major religions are based on a single book of "evidence." Your constant illogical belief in the ISS closely resembles a religious mindset.

Evidence is in the first post, which is the whole thread all about.

Well, do you believe in Tatooine? You still haven't answered that.

I said it's a commonly accepted fact that ISS exists and the live feed is the prove of it. If you think I said this is the 'truth' in that context, please enlighten me.

You just said yourself that what you say is not the truth. I simply reverberated what you said.


Still you just keep writing and writing over and over again the same thing. Until you'll not provide any of your videos which you claim you recorded, in my opinion you're untruthful.

I'm untruthful? You're the one claiming videos are undeniable evidence until proven otherwise. Prove that Tatooine does not exist. I want you to search the entirety of the Universe and verify that it does not exist. Every planet.




No, first time I hear about it.

You just lied, since I told you about it earlier in this very same post. You even replied to it.  ::)


Videos and pictures are evidences until you'll disprove them with another evidence proving that they're fake.
If you think that videos or live feeds are not enough evidences for you, it's only your opinion, because most people accept these evidences.
If you shot somebody and the video shows you, you're going to the jail, because the video is the evidence.
Also the picture of your car is the evidence in Court, if you'll not pay for your parking ticket.
Try it, so you'll see (with the car of course).

That is assuming you know where the picture came from. You don't know where these pictures/videos came from. Someone told you where they're from and you believed them, because you're gullible.

I didn't even used the word 'truth' before in that context.
I agree, the commonly accepted fact or fact is not the same as truth, so you're saying something that I already know.

Then we agree that the ISS is not real. Thanks.

I love your pictures of Tatooine. Don't you think posting them is counterproductive? The Star Wars pictures you post actually make the ISS feed and picture look even more real by comparison. Funny how no fellow FES members have supported you on this. Download the ISS and any Satracker apps. They are Free you know.

17
Flat Earth General / Re: I bet I can prove the ISS is real.
« on: November 01, 2012, 09:30:27 PM »
No one here doubts that there is something in the sky called the ISS. We doubt that it's in orbit around the earth.

If it's not in orbit, what's it doing then?  ::)

18
Flat Earth General / Re: I bet I can prove the ISS is real.
« on: November 01, 2012, 03:12:04 PM »
So, you believe in Tatooine, then?

Have you downloaded the free Sat Tracker app yet? You always avoid that. There isn't a Tatooine tracker though...........
It'd be easy to hoax one. There is a Santa tracker made by NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) after all.
http://www.noradsanta.org
Trackers aren't evidence of anything.

There is only one Santa to hoax. You cannot varify the Santa tracker obviously. There are multiple satellites, all named, all pridictable, the majority can be viewed to varify the tracker data. Please explain to me how that can be hoxed?

19
Flat Earth General / Re: I bet I can prove the ISS is real.
« on: November 01, 2012, 01:48:07 PM »
So, you believe in Tatooine, then?

Have you downloaded the free Sat Tracker app yet? You always avoid that. There isn't a Tatooine tracker though...........

20
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Big problem with the sun.
« on: October 21, 2012, 03:26:37 AM »
I believe there are pictures of Felix standing on the ledge of his capsule with the sun in shot. The sky is black yet we can see the sun. Back on Earth FET says the "atmolayer" blocks the sun causing night. So wouldn't the sun be visible 24/7 without the "atmolayer" interfierence from altitude?

21
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Round and Flat
« on: October 18, 2012, 01:50:55 PM »
Doesn't FET state that the Earth is an infinite plane?

There's many versions of FET. Some do state such, yes. Others state that it's a disk, while others even state that they don't know exactly how far it reaches, but it is flat.

Yes, billions of peole believe in 1 RE theory yet there are Multiple FE theories on this website alone. So which one is correct? LOL.

22
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Round and Flat
« on: October 17, 2012, 07:39:37 PM »
How is the inclusion of the sun, moon, and other celestial bodies relevant?
As soon as you analyze their movements you start having a perspective on how Earth is a part of a big system, not just the center of a small geocentric system. Just by checking that Galileo, Copernicus and Newton were essentially right, the flatness of the whole Earth is just unsustainable.

This is exactly right. I posted how the stars rotate at the equator as compared to the hemispheres to point this out and to abolish this whole idea of celestial gears. The stars rise in the east and set in the west, period. If you turn your head to the right, they rotate clockwise, turn to the left, counter clockwise. If the Earth was truly flat, most of the poeple would see most of the same stars most of the time all over the earth when dark. We know that this just doesn't happen.

23
Flat Earth General / Re: New - Free fall from space record attempt!
« on: October 14, 2012, 03:35:53 PM »
BTW it's very clear the Earth is round. No amount of distortion can cater for what you will see in the picture.


Thanks for that pic Ski. It actually streghthens my view. I remember Tom posting a pic of one of Felix's earlier jumps that showed the distortion clearly, the crossmembers above Felix bending with the wide agle lense. That showed me what to look for. In the picture from my link, the only curve is the horizon. The cross members above Felix are straight. So what is it? Distortion or Terminator line? Surely the Terminator line cannot be in the exact same place every time the is a space horizon shot.

24
Flat Earth General / Re: New - Free fall from space record attempt!
« on: October 14, 2012, 02:06:52 PM »
Austrian daredevil Felix Baumgartner has become the first man to break the sound barrier in a record-shattering freefall jump from the edge of space, organisers say.
There you go. he did it. BTW it's very clear the Earth is round. No amount of distortion can cater for what you will see in the picture.



http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/2012/10/15/02/52/skydiver-prepares-to-break-sound-barrier

25
Flat Earth General / Re: New - Free fall from space record attempt!
« on: October 11, 2012, 11:33:31 PM »
So in your mind the space shuttle, for example, is free from earth's gravitational pull?

Actually the Space Shuttle or any object in orbit is in constant free fall. The reason it doesn't crash into earth is because it's going just fast enough to miss.

26
Flat Earth General / Re: Sunlight right now
« on: October 09, 2012, 11:44:02 PM »
here flatorange if you want a chuckle read this;
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,52981.msg1298630.html#msg1298630
this better explains how the sun does not work simply by its impossible position.
just let the thread die dude you are being trolled by a lower fora misfit. you do know irush's only intention is to troll you and up his post count? he doesnt believe in fet any more than you do and his childish attempts to 'win' a thread are tedious at best.

I agree. He does this over and over. He's focus is purely on derailing the topic. He doesn't even show anything to defend himself.

27
Flat Earth General / Re: Does this help to show the shape of the Earth ?
« on: October 07, 2012, 06:01:28 AM »
The irony at this point is that they claim it is only countries with space programs...but the reality is that any country with telecomunications, radio towers, gps, etc. etc. etc. would have to ALL be in on the "conspiracy" including indpendant manufacturers who create circuit boards and software to handle much of the signal processing.

Since all these aspects become more globally pervasive, the amount of effort that it would take to "hide" the "faked" satelite and radio data would be utterly unmanigable.

Agreed in full. I asked Tom and Rushy to download the free ISS and Satracker apps and never got a reply, so I saw that as a victory.

28
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Flight time between Australia and Argentina
« on: October 07, 2012, 05:58:22 AM »
Time moves at the same speed on the ground, but at higher altitudes toward the south one travels at a different speed. There is no reason to have a watch which moves slower while in the air (although such a watch, properly adjusted,  WOULD tell you exactly when time was changing on the ground) because nobody is going to spend that much time in the air at once. Also, as you mentioned, there are time zone changes as well, so it's practical just to worry about what the time is on the ground once you are back on the ground not while still in the air.

This is called making up bullshit to justify the flat earth map distances. If I syncronise my watch with someone in Australia, then fly to South America,  call my friend upon landing, I bet our watches will show the same time.

29
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon Visibilty.
« on: September 28, 2012, 04:26:25 PM »
The atmolayer's role is pretty self-explanatory, and yes Thork did adequately answer the question.  When the sun is visible (day) it is not beyond the distance where the atmolayer obscures it.  When it isn't visible (night), it is.  When the moon is visible (sometimes day, sometimes night) it is not beyond the distance where the atmolayer obscures it, and when it isn't visible (again, sometimes day, sometimes night) it is beyond it.  What is it you're having trouble understanding?

Finally someone that understands my question, Thank-you. Of course I disagree though  ;D
From a technical point of view, how does this actually happen if they are always the same distance from earth?

30
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon Visibilty.
« on: September 27, 2012, 06:43:49 PM »
Can I please have a FES explanation as to why the Moon can be visible during the day and the night, and how the Sun is only visible during the day.
The very definition of night is that the sun is not illuminating the earth and it is dark. The moon is not relevant. If you can see the sun, its light can shine on you. This is an incredibly silly question.


This is an incredibly silly answer. Sounds like you don't have one so you completely avoided answering it altogether. My question has nothing to do with night and day.
Your question has everything to do with night and day.

Why can you only see the sun during the day? you asked. That's because that is the definition of day. When its light. When the sun is visible. When its light shines upon the earth and you can see it and it can see you.
Why can you see the moon at day or night you asked? Answer, because day and night is not dependent on the moon. It doesn't move across the sky with the same period as the sun. Therefore it can be visible during either.

It is a really really stupid question.


I know why I didn't ge the answer I wanted.
That's because you are vain enough to think you asked the most inciteful and clever question ever devised and hoped an entire society would come crashing down due to your wisdom. Sadly it was stupendously stupid to the point I nearly reported you to a moderator for lowering the collective IQ of the entire forum.

I think it's been too long for a response so it must be another FE victory.  ;D
Yes, but a hollow one in light of the drivel in the OP.

This thread has been officially "Thorked". No shit it's day when the sun's out. All you are doing is explaing was "is". You don't  address the "Atmolayer" issue while attempting to insult someones intelligence. Luv ya work Thorky.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5