1

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon shrimp

« on: January 16, 2012, 02:12:22 PM »

I was reading through the post about moon shrimp, shouldn't that be moon prawns though?

Has anyone ever caught one of these by the way?

Paragraph of rubbish.

The official FES evidence of moonshramps is that John Davis or James or Master Lord Of The Admiralty Willmire had a dream about them.
That isn't even me taking the piss, it really is the official evidence.

So it wasn't a Saudi Arabian bee keeper then? There seems to be some sort of hole here in this argument.

If it wasn't a Saudi Arabian then, I would like an apology from you all for saying that it was irrelevant 

2

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Moon shrimp

« on: January 16, 2012, 12:27:12 PM »

How did they get on to the moon?

Also if they're shrimp like doesn't mean they need to be in water? As last time I checked, or at least was led to believe the moon was a frozen rock pretty much!

Plus aren't the Saudi Arabians pretty unreliable at times?

3

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 12:22:00 PM »

I guess for you standards I lost the debate.
But as far science goes the RE theory, AKA real science, won. No FE apologist here have presented any scientific evidence peer reviewed by the scientific community  to back up their claims and/or assumptions.

Government conspiracy to block all the information about FET coming to light in public domain, oh wait......

4

Flat Earth Q&A / Moon shrimp

« on: January 16, 2012, 12:12:53 PM »

I was reading through the post about moon shrimp, shouldn't that be moon prawns though?

Has anyone ever caught one of these by the way?

5

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 12:03:18 PM »

Note how many posts rayman has. He doesn't actually know what he's taking about, he's just trying to siphon arguments off of Clocktower.

Ha, attacking the accuser instead of debating with a good argument.

It might be a low tactic, but effective.

At least they haven't set the dragons on you!

6

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 11:40:15 AM »

Nothing wrong with a bit of blind faith, I mean look at all the people who believe in God!

The bible at least have some archaeological backup, which is a form of science.

Does this mean you believe in God? As we all know that's a load of crap.

7

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 11:32:41 AM »

I appreciate that the sub might be scaled down a little, does that then mean that the energy it produces is scaled down?

How has the suns diameter been calculated?

FE apologists have no scientific evidence peer reviewed by the scientific community to support their claims.

They only have assumptions with no scientific backup.

Nothing wrong with a bit of blind faith, I mean look at all the people who believe in God!

8

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 11:17:08 AM »

I appreciate that the sub might be scaled down a little, does that then mean that the energy it produces is scaled down?

How has the suns diameter been calculated?

9

Flat Earth Debate / Re: Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 11:09:26 AM »

Ahh right, so out of interest how big is the FE sun compared to the RE sun 

10

Flat Earth Debate / Solar Flares

« on: January 16, 2012, 11:01:05 AM »

Can someone please explain how with FET that we are not effectively cooked by solar flares?

You suggest that the moon and sun are suspended 3100 miles above the earth, but solar flare spray can travel at 1200km/s which would suggest that we would be dead within 3 seconds (well the half in the sun at least) if one struck us.

How have we not been burnt to a crisp or are we just really lucky?