Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
scientists unwavering passion for truth which finds a way to put him against law and morality if the necessity arises.
I don't remember ever hearing about him. I don't understand why the kept letting him out of prison. No amount of good behavior would make that a good idea.
Are statistically more likely to be fappen?
Just because you name your child Doc, that does not mean they will be a doctor when they grow up.
Would you rely on 133 yr old data for anything else? Someone mentioned medical treatment. Would you rely on treatment that old if you were ill?
Microbiologists, actually, have recently proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that cannabis (marijuana is a made up word) kills...
Cancer.
“I apologize for the information I provided concerning the deaths. I believed the information I obtained was accurate, but I now know the story is nothing more than an urban legend,” Pristoop said.
Both FET and RET should be taught in school so students can arrive at an Earth shape decision that best matches the reality of the ground they live on.
It is just as important that the limitations of the scientific method are taught as well as the purported benefits. How hypothesis testing relates to Earth shape is not as important as giving students all the tools they need to conduct a rational approach to Earth shape dynamics.
We should not fear truth. We should embrace the wisdom of doing the right thing by letting our students make up their own mind.
No we should not teach FET in schools. Not ever.
You registered December last year.I would suppose I carry more weight around here than you, sir.
No I am a senior member and much respected scientist.
What's your PhD in?
What field of research do you belong to?
I would suppose I carry more weight around here than you, sir.
Go fuck yourselfIrrelevant.How is that at all irrelevant?
Volume - dimensions - space - propagation - all of these words indicate something rather than nothing.
Irrelevant.
I was asked on another thread (by moderator Ski) to create a separate thread for the purpose of discussing the purported academic qualifications of Samuel Rowbotham
Irrelevant.How is that at all irrelevant?
Volume - dimensions - space - propagation - all of these words indicate something rather than nothing.
Energy and matter both need to propagate in some volume.If there's something to expand into, it's not really "nothing".
It's not expanding into anything. It's just expanding.The big bang still exploded into something.
Incorrect.Some museum had a debate between all the great famous physicists and astrologists about this once.
All of them were pretty much 100% in disagreement with each other.
And then the professor stood up and laughing cruelly said 'Write me a 10,000 word assignment on your so called "God"' he laughing laughed.I think it's more of a philosophy issue than a physics issue.
Incorrect.Want to try to do more than just saying I'm incorrect?
Incorrect.How did the big bang happen if there wasn't already space (not space as in outer space, space as in volume) to propagate it on our dimensional plane?
Like I said, I'm not a physicist. But I imagine it might have something to do with the connection between energy and matter, as invented by A Eistein Esq.
http://bit.ly/1gSp0OB
Irrelevant.
Step 1) Buy one of these:
http://www.2spi.com/catalog/supp/electronic-analytical-balances-Scientech-Series-12000.shtml
Step 2) Start the scale. It will show 00.0000g
Step 3) Move the scale on mt. Everest.
Step 4) Observe it showing negative values (it would even be +-1g)
Step 5) Invent some BS reason why this happens xD
I did everything you asked but it still said 00.0000g when I was on top of Everest.
Nah, you didn't.
Yes I did.
No, you didn't, lol...
First, the time frame is impossible.
Secondly, these things are so sensitive, if you put it on the floor and stomp 10 meters away, it'll change its value.
Just out of curiosity though, how did you differentiate the noise?
If there's something to expand into, it's not really "nothing".
It's not expanding into anything. It's just expanding.The big bang still exploded into something.
Incorrect.Some museum had a debate between all the great famous physicists and astrologists about this once.
All of them were pretty much 100% in disagreement with each other.
And then the professor stood up and laughing cruelly said 'Write me a 10,000 word assignment on your so called "God"' he laughing laughed.I think it's more of a philosophy issue than a physics issue.
Incorrect.Want to try to do more than just saying I'm incorrect?
Incorrect.How did the big bang happen if there wasn't already space (not space as in outer space, space as in volume) to propagate it on our dimensional plane?
Like I said, I'm not a physicist. But I imagine it might have something to do with the connection between energy and matter, as invented by A Eistein Esq.
http://bit.ly/1gSp0OB
