Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
A SCUBA diver is in water, which in fact carries sound a lot better than air. A vacuum will not carry sound. However, this discussion is irrelevant since the SRBs never reach a vacuum anyway.
Can I start by saying that I am not just coming on this forum to insult or patronise anybody but I genuinely want to better understand your beliefs.
Firstly, I wanted to question was that all Space missions are hoaxes. How can this be true when there is a reflective object placed on the moon by US astronauts which is used to gauge the distance of the moon from the earth. Also how could NASA possibly gain out of the earth being spherical rather than flat?
I have read the FAQS and I appreciate responses.
What may have been the point of those previous deceptions? You see noone has pointed out why these agencies decided on a Round rather than Flat earth. Coincedence? That would be rather convenient would you not agree...
Hello. If you don't find the answers in the FAQ, while waiting for responses, you may want to search through the site to find that these topics are already answered. Enjoy
Oh wow, I have asked the OP's question at least a dozen times, every single time it gets derailed by eith parsifal bursting in with "lurk moar", or TB bursting in saying that it is for military purposes (TB should join the army, he seems to know so much about it). Neither of those responses answer the most important question here:
How does one benefit from a flat earth over a round earth?
If the earth really is flat there is no need to "fake a RE" just for "military purposes". The second possibility is that the earth is not flat and therefor this site is a joke. The third and last possibility is that there is no benefit to this conspiracy, which gives rise to the question: Whence cometh the conspiracy? (AKA: back to sqaure 1)
The benefit doesn't really have anything to do with FET vs. RET. Space agencies were most likely embezzling money long before they ever entered space. If they ever discovered that the world was flat, they naturally couldn't reveal this to the world without admitting their previous deception.
Can I start by saying that I am not just coming on this forum to insult or patronise anybody but I genuinely want to better understand your beliefs.
Firstly, I wanted to question was that all Space missions are hoaxes. How can this be true when there is a reflective object placed on the moon by US astronauts which is used to gauge the distance of the moon from the earth. Also how could NASA possibly gain out of the earth being spherical rather than flat?
I have read the FAQS and I appreciate responses.
Hello. If you don't find the answers in the FAQ, while waiting for responses, you may want to search through the site to find that these topics are already answered. Enjoy
Are you so insecure that you need to show off yourgirlfriendbeard shaving ritual on the internet? Seriously?
Claiming something does not render it true.Wow, I can make a monkey type that every time they see the word "claim" too, because that is what you are doing right now.
Please make a monkey type that.
What makes you think Cirque du Soleil is involved? Do you think Microsoft is involved when Bill Gates takes a vacation to Africa?Are you forgetting about the 7 space tourists that have visited the ISS via Space Adventures and the RSA?You think 7 people is too much for a conspiracy to take place?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism#List_of_flown_space_tourists
Are you suggesting that Cirque du Soleil is a part of the conspiracy?Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Lalibert%C3%A9Guy Laliberté, OC, CQ (born September 2, 1959) is a Québécois entrepreneur, philanthropist, poker player, space tourist and currently the CEO of Cirque du Soleil.
*sigh*
Guy Laliberté is one of seven people who paid money out of their own pocket to Space Adventures and the RSA in order to go to the ISS. Now either the conspiracy went to a great deal of effort to fool him into thinking that he spent 10 days in space, or Guy Laliberté is a member of the conspiracy. Which is it?
Claiming something does not render it true.Wow, I can make a monkey type that every time they see the word "claim" too, because that is what you are doing right now.
so i want to know when the re'ers here started to believe the earth was round? the very first time you though about it?
Actually, "pióro" more likely refers to a quill pen, seeing as it's also the polish word for (or a variation of) "feather".
Edit: Actually, I mispoke. There are indeed GPS antennas on Antarctica. They're called LORAN towers, and provide navigation for the military. LORAN towers are installed at most military bases. But they typically only provide cover for an area near them.
*Sigh* LORAN is not GPS.
Actually, LORAN function nearly identical to GPS systems. The principals of triangulation are the same.
One could reasonably call them "GPS Towers".
FE states satelites in orbit are impossible. FE states earth doesn't "have" gravity. FE states the moon does have gravitational pull.
If all the above is true, then why didn't NASA shoot up satelites to orbit the moon? One could make it orbit the moon in such a way that the satelite is always looking "down" at the FE.
The reason I am asking this is because a lot of assumptions are made on the basis of a FE not being able to support satelites in orbit. Yet as we can see it isn't neccesary to have satelites orbit earth to snapshot the earth from above.
Because NASA wants to convince us the earth is flat, Duh.
Why not try assuming both?Because then you wouldn't of had the oppurtunity to point it out to me
I should have pointed it out better by banning you
Why not try assuming both?Because then you wouldn't of had the oppurtunity to point it out to me
Can we all accept that people long ago also believed that the Earth was spherical? If we can accept that, then what purpose would the conspiracy serve back in those times? Why would the Greeks in 4th century BC have needed to create a conspiracy? And finally, what reason would every single culture since then have to perpetuate this conspiracy?
If someone says that the 4th century BC greeks wanted money from NASA funding, I'll punch a bunny in the face.
The Greeks were just mistaken. Like when they said that flies were generated spontaneously in spoiled meat.
Oh, believerintilldiein, we hardly knew you.
Did the banhammer hit him? D:
Of course.
Oh, believerintilldiein, we hardly knew you.
FE states satelites in orbit are impossible. FE states earth doesn't "have" gravity. FE states the moon does have gravitational pull.
If all the above is true, then why didn't NASA shoot up satelites to orbit the moon? One could make it orbit the moon in such a way that the satelite is always looking "down" at the FE.
The reason I am asking this is because a lot of assumptions are made on the basis of a FE not being able to support satelites in orbit. Yet as we can see it isn't neccesary to have satelites orbit earth to snapshot the earth from above.
Please provide evidence that you're looking at satellite.
By using a telescope, must I spell the word, which describes this magical artifact, out to you?Why would they even say there isn't satellites when occassionally you can see them in the sky, PizzaPlanet you are pathetic
Really? How do you do this?
Which is even saderFor some reason I thought Parsifal was really the guy in his avatar hahahahaha
Sadly no, he is the dude pictured above. The only member with their actual picture in their avatar is Tom Bishop
Three: often the quality of the pirated rip is lower than what some people would prefer.
Why would they even say there isn't satellites when occassionally you can see them in the sky, PizzaPlanet you are pathetic
Don't make me unleash the fury!
Fuck angry ranting.
Fuck pointless whinging.
This thread needs to be locked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudolite
No, you make the short flights seem longer and leave the long ones unaltered.
