Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Tsar Bomba Video
I'm posting in this quality thread.
Typical atheists.... completely closed minded know it alls with that condescending tone.Invisibility to Visiblity is a really tough arguement. For invisiblity that is.
God told me he was afraid of Chuck Norris.Chuck Norris told me he was afraid of the most intresting man in the world.
Atomic theory is just a theory and is accepted as such, a good way of making predictions based on a useful framework rather than an approximation of truth. RET is exactly the same thing a theory, but somewhere along the way people have got confused and started treating it as a descriptiton of the world.It was a theory until humans went to sp- I'm sorry, until the CONSPIRACY went to space and then it became a law.
how the round earth could have possibly formed in the first place?!This works both ways, all ideas of how a round earth was formed are theories, big bang, dust clouds, etc. This theory is just about a flat earth and that it exists, not how it was formed.
So, if thats the case. The only way I will ever believe the world is flat is if you sent me into space to see it. See how that works both ways? :|You went from "Do you have proof?" to "They need to not have a stake in the space program" to "I need to be there myself".That's hardly "moving the goal post". The only way to get valid evidence is from a valid source, and I'm the only source I can guarantee is valid.
Classic case of moving the goalpost.
FAQ is broken and those points explicitly are going agaisnt the FAQ. Wiki is not a proper source to disprove said questions and doesnt even ansewer them fully or at all and using a source from this site is pretty much going to show you have no other evidence but your own to disrpove them. And the Search function brought up topics that went unansewered. So please, elaborate us.They wouldn't be off-topic. If you manage, somehow, to disprove the roundness of the Earth, you'd do it with evidence for the flatness (or other-shaped-ness) of the Earth, which is exactly what this topic is asking for. The "I would, but I'm too lazy" thing is rather telling.RET is not the default, FET is. Also, they have all been addressed. The FAQ, Wiki, and search function will elaborate.
Maximohondoom it's not that the way we build our language governs the laws of the universe, it's that the way the universe is defines our language, by introspecting our language we can derive the state of the world, and by determining the necessary state of certain words such as "earth" we can determine the necessary state of reality. The word earth clearly must refer to the sum total of all the flat planes we experience because no human can possibly see this so-called round earth as a round object or even as a sum of cureved objects because from the point of human reference the theory itself states that you will still refer to something which is flat, so the theory itself is flawwed.First off, I wont even bother disproving your logic because it has almost nothing to do with the actual shape of earth, and he wasnt actually insulting your spelling. He was insulting what you understood about your post AND your logic.
On the subject of theories, no theory is designed so as to correspond to reality they are just designed to have the greatest predictive power, i'm not saying that RET doesn't have good predictive power or even that it's a bad theory, i'm just saying it is a flawwed representation of the world, and people seem to keep confusing a theory with how the world actually is, the world actually is flat and it is good to see a website like this trying to adapt the superior FET to have the same predictive power as RET.
As for Mr Psudonym, if the best contribution you can make to a thread is to comment on spelling you might want to consider not making any contribution at all.
Welcome to the internet, try to difference sarcasm/trolling/ and honesty in text.All facial coverings, including hair should be banned. You hear me muggsy. You. Hear. Me?
Why exactly would you do that? It can limit and sometimes destroy individuality along with freedom of expression and religion just like it said in the article.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/nasa_space_balloon_crashes_into_5kvJhMOJ0NNuQWuPReyxzK
I'd like to point out that it is a NASA sponsored balloon and not a NASA launched one. Big difference.
But even so, yes it crashed. But you know what? People crash their cars. Does that mean everyone is a failure at driving?
I'm basing my questions on what I've read in a few other posts.I saw that post, and the fellow who said it was a round earther making fun of flat earthers. Try to be able to tell sarcasm from seriousness, its hard to do. (Especially if your new.) To tell who is who. Everyone who has so far posted in this thread (Including me.) is a Round Earther.
In one, a man asked "What about all the people that have sailed around the world? Or flown in an airplane?" I shocked somebody answered "Well as for the people that sailed around the world, they lied, of course. And the people that have flown in planes are all a part of the conspiracy, including the pilots as well."
I may have not gotten it word for word but go look it up. Frankly its disturbing, people are so wrapped up in paranoia of conspiracies.
Fascinating.Interestingly, if you read 'the very hungry caterpillar' backwards it's a story about a bulimic butterfly.If you watch porn in reverse... its still pretty much the same. It just... starts with the penis acting more like a vacuum than a hose.
(If you read the Bible backwards it's the story of Jesus who came down to Earth, died in a cave, had his corpse hung from a cross until some kind Romans healed the wounds with their magic spears and whips. Jesus toured the Holy Lands getting fewer and fewer followers as he performed all sorts of mean tricks like blinding a sighted person, spreading leprosy, turning wine into water and killing Lazarus before 3 wise men came and stole his presents.)
And if the scientific data in those baffles you....here is one that is probably more your speed.
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
That last link is actually legit looking but as we said, Lunar Eclipses are possible during sunrise and sunset which is what those pics were taken that.Do you not trust those?5. The Antimoon can be shown to exist by the phenomenon of daytime Lunar eclipses. The globularist model requirse that the Sun be "behind" the Round Earth from the perspective of the observer, so that the Earth blocks the Sun's rays. This ought to preclude the two bodies being in the same hemisphere simultaneously, although empirical evidence demonstrates that they are. Therefore, another celestial body is blocking Lunar visibility from Earth during an eclipse.
Any pictures or links to back this up?
How come it's undetectable, even to scientists that have no place in the conspiracy that would have seen this phenomenon.
Daylight Lunar eclipses are well-documented, many have occured throughout history. The 19th Century geographer and astronomer Dr. McCulloch recorded two incidences, one in his own lifetime (in 1837) and one in 1717. The Daily Telegraph reported a daytime lunar eclipse on July 16th, 1870. They occur on a fairly regular basis.One more. Why has it never been observed in the daylight? We see the moon during the day all the time. Why not the anitmoon?
It has never been observed in the daylight (except during Lunar eclipses!) because it does not emit its own light, like the Moon does. For this reason it is only visible when it passes in front of the Moon.Also, here's where I'm going to shoot a giant hole in your little piece of BS here. See, if there were two objects in the sky during an eclipse, an event that is frequently observed and photographed, then people would see two objects. Especially since the FE model says that the moon is 3000 miles above the Earth, that puts the "antimoon" at a lower altitude. If you don't believe that people would see two objects, try this. Put an object of your choosing on a table, if you don't own a table, just use your floor. Now, put another object of similar size and shape in front of the first one. Now, look at them from different angles. You'll notice, at some point, you can even see in between the two. Since an object floating in front of the moon, has NEVER been documented, your antimoon is nothing more than a figment of your imagination.
People do see two objects. This is precisely why the Moon becomes invisible during a Lunar eclipse.
How come this is the only crap I found? http://www.trivalleystargazers.org/gert/sunset_mooneclipse/sun_moon_eclipse.htm Which looks pretty suspicious. And thanks for giving us like, 2 references to Daytime Lunar Eclipses.
If you could please define who exactly harassed you and how they did. It could, for all we know. Have been pranksters that tried to scare you. Its not uncommon with you two's wild views on earth and science.I have had similar experiences. Again, I tend to like to think that it was all a coincidence and honest mistakes, but it gets harder and harder to believe it as the evidence racks up.2.There is no Conspiracy they dont harass anyone.
They have harassed me extensively.
If the Earth is round, how can a lunar eclipse occur in broad day light?1.There are no Lunar Eclipses in broad daylight. I have not seen one, I have seen no reports. And alot of investigation today brought no evidence.
If the Earth is round, why does the Conspiracy harass everyone who tries to investigate it?
If the Earth is round, why was John Davis not allowed inland into Antarctica?
If the Earth is round, which way is up?
It is, its just we -dont have the funding-.I just put the current list up on the first post.Its not that NASA hasnt gone to mars, we have, rovers. Its that HUMANS appearantly werent sent to mars.
I don't agree that any of them break or even have a problem with Round Earth Theory but hey, whatever you say.
I'm just saying that were RE true, space travel would be a lot easier than they seem to be finding it.
I just put the current list up on the first post.Its not that NASA hasnt gone to mars, we have, rovers. Its that HUMANS appearantly werent sent to mars.
I don't agree that any of them break or even have a problem with Round Earth Theory but hey, whatever you say.
