Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AwesomeForever

Pages: [1]
1
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light bending
« on: August 24, 2009, 08:43:10 PM »
Nope, its because light bends upwards when its hot.

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Puhlease explain this one.
« on: August 24, 2009, 08:37:58 PM »
The Coriolis effect can't work on a flat earth. Simply due to the fact that it works the opposite way in the southern hemisphere (below the equator if the southern hemisphere doesn't exist). And don't tell me that its because of some bullshit frame dragging effect. That's not how frame dragging works.

3
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Light bending
« on: August 24, 2009, 08:06:15 AM »
Ever been to a desert? Or at least a really hot highway? Looks blue to me.

4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« on: August 22, 2009, 07:50:18 AM »
If light is bending, why don't we see airplanes over the "horizon's" surface?

5
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What powers The Sun?
« on: August 12, 2009, 06:28:27 PM »
Not if its a wormhole that leads to a giant ball of fusing hydrogen. The light and energy leaks out!

6
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What powers The Sun?
« on: August 12, 2009, 05:02:56 PM »
Hydrogen fusing into Helium. On a disk.

7
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How is this possible?
« on: August 12, 2009, 07:35:50 AM »
Not really:


8
Flat Earth Q&A / I have a question about the Ice Wall
« on: August 12, 2009, 07:27:07 AM »
An ice wall is just a wall of ice. (As the name implies) Therefor, he has shown you an ice wall. The FET ice wall however, is Antarctica and is at the edge of the known world.

FET implies that bendy light or electromagnetic acceleration causes light to warp in a way that causes the Earth to look round. Hence, you could not see the edge of the world from your position, nor use a telescope to magnify it, since a telescope doesn't really move your coordinates, it just makes things look bigger. Also, pictures can be doctored, no matter how old or new, so you can't really use them as evidence.

The Earth looks round, whether by bendy light, or by its supposed curve. You can't really disprove neither side, unless you build, say, a 35 mile long metal beam. But I guess the beam would bend anyways either by warped light in FET, or by the curvature of the Earth in RET.

9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Beam Neutrinos
« on: August 12, 2009, 07:20:12 AM »
Unless the ground is made of lead or something, then I guess the beam will travel in a slightly curved line.

10
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How is this possible?
« on: August 12, 2009, 07:10:59 AM »
I guess the current model makes it act as if the north pole is in the center of a coin shape. (Antarctica is an ice wall at the edge of this coin shape and beyond that said ice wall there may or may not be an infinite plane of land/mountains, whatever.)
Its sort of like if you look at a globe from the top, and stretch out the bottom so it makes a flat round surface.

11
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Simple way to prove your theory.
« on: August 12, 2009, 04:59:39 AM »
Why can't I see planes flying on the ground then, if light bends upwards?

12
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Simple way to prove your theory.
« on: August 11, 2009, 06:28:16 PM »
Why can't I see planes flying on the ground then, if light bends upwards?

13
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: August 09, 2009, 05:52:06 PM »
I can't see my ass, it must not be there, even though I'm clearly sitting on it. Nothing behind me exists either, because I can't see it. Mirrors are also faked photographs that move.

Anyways, a frame dragging effect does not work in this way.

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: What keeps the atmosphere in place?
« on: August 09, 2009, 05:38:50 PM »
Quote
In RET, it is assumed that gravitation holds the atmosphere in (I wouldn't use a term like 'gravity' around here by the way- unlike many people, we understand the distinction). The only evidence that this is the case is that the atmosphere hasn't excaped. The mechanism for gravitation is unknown.

Unfortunately, I do know the distinction. Here's a quick question: Why aren't fat people attracted to each other and from a giant mass?

15
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Okay, so, I'm probably just getting trolled. Right?
« on: August 09, 2009, 05:34:12 PM »
Quote
Planes which fly high enough to see definite curvature of the earth, and ships which sink below the horizon, but that's dismissed by bendy light and some weird perspective laws.
I've never seen the curvature of the earth, and I've been on numerous planes.
When we see a lunar eclipse, we observe that the shadow of the Earth upon the moon is round, indicating that the object interposed between the Moon and the Sun is spherical.
This has been discussed.
Maps work.
Compasses work
GPS works
They all work on a flat earth, as well as a round one.
Surveyor Alfred Russel Wallace performed the Bedford Level experiment after Rowbotham and got results in favor of a round earth, as part of an arbitrated bet.
This is debated.

Just because YOU haven't seen the curvature of the earth doesn't mean other people have. I live on Okinawa, Japan, I see the curvature of the earth everyday.

How does a GPS work if satellites don't? Speaking of which, why did you drop that bit in the quote about satellites working?


How about this:
Explain the Coriolis effect and how it differs from above the equator, and below it. How can a flat earth be able to create such an effect?

Pages: [1]