Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - simpson3883

Pages: [1]
are you actually serious?

Scott's team did reach the Ice Wall, which is why he was murdered before being able to return to the coast and alert the world to his discovery.

I'm sorry what evidence do you have for this?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 30, 2009, 12:44:24 PM »
so what is a plane thats going towards Earth actually staying still?

if so explain that weird stomach feeling (scientific I know :A)

Scott walked thousands of miles into Antarctica.

How does this work without him reaching the ice wall?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 30, 2009, 11:16:37 AM »
OK so if everything that is affected by air resistance is moving upwards...    Are all planes also constantly moving upwards?

Flat Earth Q&A / Evidence
« on: June 29, 2009, 10:55:23 PM »
Is there any evidence for a Flat Earth?

Because so far all I've seen is an explanation of how it might work.

And remember for visual evidence - to quote some guy who I've forgotten - "Pictures or it didn't happen"

Oh and also because all pictures of a Round Earth are 'Faked' I'm gonna need evidence that they arent faked.

Seriously though evidence

Don't tell me to look it up - SHOW ME HERE!

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Antimoon
« on: June 29, 2009, 10:50:39 PM »
OK well the question hasn't been answered at all.

Heres your theory

The antimoon is undetectable. BUT! When it passes between the Earth and the Moon, it suddenly starts blocking out visible light.

Hm...... I think a more plausible theory is that the moon is made of cheese and a giant mouse eats it. But he realises its past its sell by date and spits it out.

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 29, 2009, 01:16:50 PM »
But the feather according to you is not moving. Do you mean to say it is pushed upwards?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 29, 2009, 01:06:40 PM »
you miss my point.

If the objects are not actually moving but the Earth is - how are they slowed by air resistance?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Eclipses
« on: June 29, 2009, 12:35:34 PM »
What evidence is there for an antimoon?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 29, 2009, 12:33:54 PM »
The point is AIR RESISTANCE SLOWS THE FEATHER!!!! if the feather doesnt move but the Earth does, how does this work?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Eclipses
« on: June 29, 2009, 10:06:53 AM »
then what causes phases of the moon. OK fine about the square thing but you still didnt explain the variations in shape.

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Falling Objects
« on: June 28, 2009, 11:25:06 PM »
You say that a pea and watermelon would not suffer from air resistance -fine, assume it was a feather and a hammer.         The hammer will obviously hit the ground first due to air resistance. How does this work with an accelerating Earth rather than gravity?

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Eclipses
« on: June 28, 2009, 11:22:06 PM »
This makes absolutely no sense. Do you wish to say that it only affects light when it is between the Earth and the moon?

Also what shape is this object? At a half moon it would have to be a square larger than the moon to create a vertical shadow on the moon but at a crescent moon it would have to be circular and slightly smaller than the moon.

Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Eclipses
« on: June 28, 2009, 04:40:13 AM »
If it is undetectable, surely it does not interfere with light and so cannot cause an eclipse.

Flat Earth Q&A / Eclipses
« on: June 27, 2009, 12:08:42 PM »
I know you must hear it over and over again but I've never heard an FEer give a valid explanation for Lunar or Solar eclipses


Flat Earth Q&A / Re: 24 hour darkness
« on: April 28, 2009, 01:38:19 PM »
theres an FAQ?

Flat Earth Q&A / 24 hour darkness
« on: April 28, 2009, 01:30:00 PM »
At the North and South pole, 24 hour darkness is observed for parts of the year. Please show me an animation of the way the Sun creates day and night in the Flat Earth Theory that shows this, or at least explain it well

Flat Earth Debate / Lack of constant blue shift
« on: April 20, 2009, 02:13:19 AM »
If the Earth were constantly acellerating towards the heavens, surely the blue shift phenomona would be present in almost all heavenly bodies unless these also are accellerating at EXACTLY the same speed in the same direction which I doubt even the most 'open-minded' person could beleive

Please explain what the point of such a conspiracy would be

Pages: [1]