Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
QuoteYou cannot "prove" anything, except the "I think, therefore I am" assertion from Kant, but you can show overwhelming scientific evidence towards a spherical Earth.
So where's your evidence?
Seriously, if NASA is projecting holograms into the sky, they would need a huge worldwide network of "holographic projectors" to cover all visible satellites, shuttles, the ISS etc. simultaneously. Before you ask: no, I'm pretty sure there are no sky-hologram projectors in my neighborhood.
Have you confirmed this? That is to say, have you scouted every square metre of your neighbourhood and made sure that nothing is projecting a hologram into the sky?Not to mention whenever a cloud passes overhead the hologram would be projected onto the cloud. Like Batman's symbol.
They actively monitor the weather, and switch off or dim the holograms as clouds pass by.
There's nothing about Flat Earth Theory which prevents space travel. Under FE, the moon and stars are satellites which orbit above the earth on a circular path. FE Theory explains why this is possible (cancelation of the DE by the DEF or some guff like that). There's nothing to prevent a man made object (satellite, shuttle etc) doing the same.
Prove it? Oh, no wait...
As soon as you're out of atmosphere your fuel consumption goes down to almost nothing, and you ever notice that they drop a huge part of the shuttle off after launch, you know what that carried? Fuel. Because the initial take off takes almost more fuel than the rest of the trip combined.
So, um, don't make jackshit claims.
Don't apply your RE propaganda to FET and then talk to me like I'm the idiot. You can't orbit anything in FET, which means to stay in space you need constant propulsion to stop falling back to Earth.
So you have no answer, and resort to insulting my intelligence. Have you ever thought to question whether your beliefs are actually valid, or are you just arrogantly assuming that you know all the answers?
I answered you.
Why would they have nowhere else to go? You only know they go up, you can't know when or where they come back down. If it isn't possible to get to the moon, that would be a very good reason not to go.
So you have no answer, and resort to insulting my intelligence. Have you ever thought to question whether your beliefs are actually valid, or are you just arrogantly assuming that you know all the answers?
NASA can launch rockets, not spacecraft. The rockets do not reach sustained spaceflight, or spaceflight for that matter as NASA has nothing to gain by doing so.
How do you know the rockets went into orbit after being launched?
First off - NASA never went to the moon. Any reflections are from the highly reflective moon dust. We obviously don't know what the moon dust is.
When you shine a light at a mirror it hits the mirror and bounces off at a the opposite angle like this:
Not straight back at the source like you propose, you want proof buy a laser pointer and shine it at an angle at a reflective surface, see where it shows up.
the reflectors placed on the moon by NASA were retroreflectors, which are designed to always shine light back in the direction it came.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroreflector
QuoteWouldn't the military just not tell people? So they could make money.
I wouldn't be surprised if large parts of the military's computer models of the earth's weather was randomly or predicatively generated based on their limited data points.
The truth is that the government uses a great number of different technologies to monitor the weather. It's not only buoys; every military ship and plane also has advanced on board weather radar which streams to the NOAA.
The certain points on the moon the topography of the moon is such that head on - reflections are reflected back.
The moon isn't a perfectly spherical surface. Even NASA would agree with me on this.
First off - NASA never went to the moon. Any reflections are from the highly reflective moon dust. We obviously don't know what the moon dust is.
